--- Page 1 ---
FM CMC WASHINGTON DC CDI//MID// 
TO AL MARADMIN(UC)// 
UNCLAS// MARADMIN 495/14 
MSGID/GENADMIN/CMC WASHINGTON DC CDI// 
SUBJECT/UPDATE TO AIR ASSAULT TERMS FOR USE IN MARINE CORPS WARFIGHTING PUBLICATION 
(MCWP)  3-11.4// 
REF/A/DOC/CMC/21AUG12// 
AMPN/REFERENCE (REF) A IS MCBUL 5603, MARINE CORPS DOCTRINAL PROPONENCY ASSIGNMENT 
POC/RODNEY WILSON/MAJ/CDD/TEL DSN 378-8440//COML (703)432-8440 EMAIL: 
RODNEY.WILSON(AT)USMC.MIL// 
ALTERNATE POC/ROBERT EMERSON/MAJ/CDD/TEL DSN 278-9686/COML (703)784-9686/EMAIL: 
ROBERT.H.EMERSON(AT)USMC.MIL// 
RMKS/ 1. IN ACCORDANCE WITH REF A, MCWP 3-11.4 IS CURRENTLY BEING REVIEWED BY CAPABILITIES 
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORATE (CDD). 
2. BACKGROUND.  CDD, IN CLOSE COORDINATION WITH MARINE AVIATION WEAPONS AND TACTICS 
SQUADRON MAWTS-1 AND MARINE CORPS TACTICS & OPERATIONS GROUP, HAVE DEVELOPED 
CHANGES TO AVIATION TERMINOLOGY.  THE ATTACHED LIST WAS REVIEWED BY THE OPERATING 
FORCES VIA MARINE CORPS ACTION TRACKING SYSTEM EARLIER THIS YEAR.  ALL COMMENTS HAVE 
BEEN RECONCILED.  DURING THE INTERIM PERIOD, PRIOR TO RELEASE OF THE NEXT VERSION OF MCWP 
3-11.4, THIS MARINE ADMINISTRATIVE MESSAGE SERVES AS OFFICIAL NOTICE OF APPROVED 
TERMINOLOGY CHANGES.  
3. COORDINATING INSTRUCTIONS.  THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF TERMINOLOGY MODIFICATIONS.  FOR 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ACCEPTED OR CANCELLED TERMS, REFER TO THE DOCTRINE WEBSITE:  
HTTPS://WWW.DOCTRINE.USMC.MIL/MAIN.ASP, UNDER MCWP 3-11.4. 
READ IN TWO COLUMNS. 
TERM       ACTION 
ASSAULT SUPPORT HELICOPTER    REPLACE WITH ASSAULT SUPPORT AIRCRAFT. 
HELICOPTER ASSAULT FORCE    REPLACE WITH AIR ASSAULT FORCE OR MARINE 
       AIR ASSAULT TASK FORCE. 
HELICOPTER DIRECTION CENTER   REPLACE WITH AMPHIBIOUS AIR TRAFFIC  
       CONTROL CENTER. 
HELICOPTER EMPLOYMENT AND ASSAULT   REPLACE WITH ASSAULT SUPPORT LANDING  
LANDING TABLE      TABLE. 
HELICOPTER LANDING DIAGRAM   REPLACE WITH LANDING ZONE DIAGRAM. 
HELICOPTER LANDING ZONE RECONNAISSANCE  REPLACE WITH LANDING ZONE  

--- Page 2 ---
       RECONNAISSANCE. 
HELICOPTER WAVE AND SERIAL ASSIGNMENT TABLE REPLACE WITH ASSAULT SUPPORT SERIAL  
       ASSIGNMENT TABLE. 
HELICOPTERBORNE ASSAULT    REPLACE WITH AIR ASSAULT. 
HELICOPTERBORNE OPERATIONS   REPLACE WITH AIR ASSAULT OPERATIONS. 
HELICOPTERBORNE UNIT COMMANDER   REPLACE WITH AIR ASSAULT FORCE  
       COMMANDER. 
LANDING ZONE CONTROL PARTY   USA TERM DISCONTINUED IN USMC  
       PUBLICATIONS.  THERE IS NO FORMAL MARINE 
CORPS REPLACEMENT FOR THIS TERM. 
LOGISTICS ASSAULT BASE    USA TERM DISCONTINUED IN USMC  
       PUBLICATIONS.  THERE IS NO FORMAL MARINE 
CORPS REPLACEMENT FOR THE TERM. 
4. THIS MARADMIN IS APPLICABLE TO MARINE CORPS TOTAL FORCE. 
5. RELEASE AUTHORIZED BY LIEUTENANT GENERAL K. J. GLUECK, JR., DEPUTY COMMANDANT, COMBAT 
DEVELOPMENT AND INTEGRATION.// 

--- Page 3 ---
                                           MCWP 3-11.4 
 
 
 
 
Helicopterborne Operations 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
US Marine Corps 
 
 
 
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is 
unlimited. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PCN 143 000147 00 
 

--- Page 4 ---
To Our Readers
Changes:  Readers of this publication are encouraged to submit suggestions and changes that 
will improve it. Recommendati ons may be sent directly to  Commanding General, Marine 
Corps Combat Development Co mmand, Doctrine Division (C 42), 3300 Russell Road, Suite 
318A, Quantico, VA 22134-5021 or by fax to 703-784-2917 (DSN 278-2917) or by E-mail to 
nancy.morgan@usmc.mil. Recommendations should include the following information:
● Location of change
Publication number and title
Current page number
Paragraph number (if applicable)
Line number
Figure or table number (if applicable)
● Nature of change
Add, delete
Proposed new text, preferably double-spaced and typewritten
● Justification and/or source of change
Additional copies:  A printed copy of this publication may be obtained from Marine Corps 
Logistics Base, Albany, GA 317 04-5001, by following the in structions in MCBul 5600, 
Marine Corps Doctrinal Publications Status.   An electronic copy may be obtained from the 
Doctrine Division, MCCDC, world wide web home page which is found at the following uni-
versal reference locator:  https://www.doctrine.usmc.mil.
Unless otherwise stated, whenever the masculine gender is used, both 
men and women are included.

--- Page 5 ---
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Headquarters United States Marine Corps
Washington, D.C. 20380-1775
16 August 2004
FOREWORD
Marine Corps Warfighting Publication (MCWP) 3-11.4, Helicopterborne Operations ,
describes how infantry and aviation units plan and conduct helicopterborne operations
during subsequent operation s ashore. MCWP 3-11.4 emphasi zes the coordination neces-
sary between ground, air, combat support, and combat service support organizations con-
cerning the planning sequence and tactical em ployment of ground and aviation elements.
It describes the versa tility of helicopterborne  operations and explains the tactical funda-
mentals of helicopterborne operations for ground-based operations once ashore. 
MCWP 3-11.4 is intended for commanders, staff officers, and support units responsible
for the planning and execution of helicopterborne operations. However, it should be read
by any Marine involved in the execution of helicopterborne operations.
This publication does not contain information relative to amphibious operations. Helicop-
terborne operations in amphibious operations are discussed in MCWP 3-31.5, Ship-to-
Shore Movement, Naval Warfare Publication (NWP) 3-22.5, Tactical Manual series, and
Joint Publication (JP) 3-02.1, Joint Doctrine for Landing Force Operations.
This publication supers edes Fleet Marine Forc e Manual (FMFM) 6-21, Tactical Funda-
mentals of Helicopterborne Operations, dated June 1991.
Reviewed and approved this date.
BY DIRECTION OF THE COMMANDANT OF THE MARINE CORPS
EDWARD HANLON, JR.
Lieutenant General, U.S. Marine Corps
Commanding General
Marine Corps Combat Development Command
Publication Control Number: 143 000147 00
Distribution Statement A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

--- Page 6 ---
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1. Overview
Sequence of Operations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1
Tactical Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-2
Command and Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-3
Helicopterborne Forces. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-4
Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-4
Task Organization Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-4
Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-5
Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-5
Vulnerabilities  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-6
Chapter 2. Preparation for Combat
Intelligence Preparation of the Battlespace  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1
Threat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1
Task Organization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-2
Chapter 3. Command and Control
Planning  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1
Effective Task Organization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1
Precise Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1
Decentralized Execution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2
Helicopterborne Radio Nets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2
Airborne Command and Control  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2
Mission Commander. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2
Air Mission Commander  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3
Helicopterborne Unit Commander . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3
Assault Flight Leader . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-3
Escort Flight Leader . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4
Assault Support Coordinator (Airborne)  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4
Tactical Air Coordinator (Airborne). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4
Forward Air Controller (Airborne). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-4
Initial Terminal Guidance Teams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-5
Helicopter Support Team . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-5
Pickup Zone Control Officer  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-6
Subordinate Unit Commanders  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-6
Command Post . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-6
Combat Operations Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-6
Rear Area Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-6

--- Page 7 ---
iv _____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
Chapter 4. Planning
Section I. Estimation Process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1
Analysis of METT-T. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-2
Mission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-2
Enemy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-2
Terrain and Weather . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-2
Troops and Support Available  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4
Time Available . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4
Ground Commander’s View of the Plan of Attack. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4
Scheme of Maneuver  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4
Plan for Supporting Fires  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-4
Loading Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5
Air Movement Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5
Landing Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5
Section II. Detailed Planning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5
Ground Tactical Plan  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5
Mission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6
Concept of Operations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6
Landing Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6
Selection of Landing Zones  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-6
Single Versus Multiple Landing Zones  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-8
Landing Formations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-8
Supporting Fires . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-8
Emergency Extract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-9
Air Movement Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-10
Selection of Helicopter Approach and Retirement Routes . . . . . . . . . . 4-10
Ground Considerations During Helicopter Movement. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-10
Supporting Fires Along the Approach and Retirement Route  . . . . . . . 4-11
Loading Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-11
Primary and Alternate Pickup Zones  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-11
Pickup Zone Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-11
Pickup Zone Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-12
Staging Plan  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-15
Section III. Mission Briefing and Debriefing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-15
Mission Brief. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-15
Helicopterborne Mission Briefing Guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-15
Chapter 5. Combat Operations
Section I. Helicopterborne Operations in Offensive Operations . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1
Attack  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1
Hasty Attack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-2
Deliberate Attack  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-2
Exploitation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3
Pursuit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3

--- Page 8 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ______________________________________________________________________________________ v 
Secure and Defend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3
Seizure and Retention. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-3
Control Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4
Assault Objectives  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4
Reconnaissance in Force. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-4
Raid. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-5
Section II. Helicopterborne Operations in Defensive Operations . . . . . . . . . . 5-5
Defensive Operations Against an Armor-Heavy Threat  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6
Economy of Force  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-6
Delay. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7
Section III. Other Tactical Missions and Operational Considerations . . . . . . . 5-7
Screening  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7
Guard Force  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-7
Covering Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-8
Reinforcement of Committed Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-8
Linkup Operations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-8
River Crossing Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-8
Rear Area Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-9
Night and Limited Visibility Operations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-9
Operations in a Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Environment . . . . . . . . 5-9
Chapter 6. Combat S upport Within the Helicopterborne Force
Section I. Fire Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-1
Fire Support Coordinator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-2
Fire Support Delivery Means . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-2
Section II. Fire Support Planning and Coordination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-3
Formal and Informal Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-3
Displacement of Fire Support. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-3
Enemy Air Defense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-4
Fire Support Coordination  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-4
Section III. Artillery Helicopterborne Operations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5
Planning Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5
Range of Artillery and Other Support Systems  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5
Importance of the Target  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5
Airlift Assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5
Risk in Crossing Lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5
Target Location. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5
Pickup Zone and/or Landing Zone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5
Ammunition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-5
Communications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-6
Security. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-6
Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-6
Section IV. Air Defense in Helicopterborne Operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-6
Capabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-6

--- Page 9 ---
vi _____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
Planning Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-7
Using Helicopters to Support Air Defense Operations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6-8
Chapter 7. Combat Service Support
Section I. Helicopter Support Team  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1
Helicopter Support Team Organization  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-1
Advance Party . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-2
HST Headquarters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-2
Other MAGTF Support. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-2
Landing Support Battalion  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-3
Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-3
Training. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-3
Employment  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-3
Section II. Combat Service Support Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-4
Considerations Prior to Planning  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-4
Key Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-4
Specific Points. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-4
Planning Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-5
Basic Load and Combat Service Support Buildup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-5
Basic Load. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-5
Combat Service Support Buildup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-6
Section III. Execution of Combat Service Support  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-6
CSS Trains  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-6
Supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-7
Maintenance  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-8
Field and Personnel Support Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-8
Medical Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-8
Casualty Evacuation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-8
Helicopter Casualty Evacuation Control 
and Coordination Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-8
Section IV. External Load Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-9
External Load Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-9
Elements of an External Lift Mission . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-10
Section V. Aviation Support Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-11
Forward Arming and Refueling Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-11
Aircraft Maintenance  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-11
Tactical Recovery of Aircraft and Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-11
Chapter 8. Conduct of a He licopterborne Operation
Movement From the Assembly Area to the Landing Zone  . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1
Procedures in the Pickup Zone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1
Organization of the Pickup Zone  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-1
Infantry Movement to the Pickup Zone  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-2

--- Page 10 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ vii 
Helicopter Movement to the Pickup Zone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-2
Lift-off From the Pickup Zone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-2
En route to the Landing Zone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-2
Security. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-3
Landing Operations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-3
Command and Control Helicopter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-3
Landing Zone Preparatory Fires . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-3
Landing Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-4
Completion of the Landing Zone Operation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-5
Commanders’ Responsibilities/Sequence of Actions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-5
Helicopterborne Mission Commander or 
Helicopterborne Unit Commander . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-5
Air Mission Commander  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-5
Helicopterborne Force Executive Officer. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-6
Helicopterborne Force S-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-6
Helicopterborne Force S-2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-7
Helicopterborne Force GCE S-3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-7
Helicopterborne Force GCE Air Officer  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-8
Helicopterborne Force GCE S-4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-9
Helicopterborne Force GCE Fire Support Coordinator . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-9
Subordinate Unit Commander . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-10
Helicopterborne Force Commander . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-10
Planning Sequence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-10
Time Schedule  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-10
Ground Tactical Plan  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-11
Landing Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-11
Air Movement Plan  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-12
Loading Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-12
Staging Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-12
Appendices
A. Small-Unit Leader’s Guide to Pickup 
Zone and Landing Zone Operations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1
B. Air Mission Commander’s or Air Officer’s Checklist. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1
C. Helicopterborne Unit Commander’s Checklist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1
D. Landing Zone Brief . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1
E. Example of an Annex to Battalion 
SOPs for Helicopterborne Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-1
F. Formats for the Five Basic Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . F-1
G. Helicopterborne Training. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . G-1
H. Marine Corps Helicopter Characteristics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . H-1
I. Sample Helicopterborne Warning Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-1
J. Glossary  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .J-1
K. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K-1

--- Page 11 ---
CHAPTER 1
OVERVIEW
Helicopterborne operations are tactical operations
in which assault forces  maneuver on the battle-
field under the directio n of an assigned com-
mander in order to en gage and destroy enemy
forces or to seize ke y terrain. They are best
employed in situations th at provide the force a
calculated advantage due to surprise, terrain,
threat, or mobility. He licopterborne operations
allow the commander to  maneuver rapidly to
achieve tactical surprise and mass forces, regard-
less of obstacles and without dependency on
ground lines of communication. These operations
embody the combined-arms concept through coor-
dination and planning between the air and ground
commanders. Infantry and air units can be fully
integrated with other me mbers of the combined-
arms team to form powerful and flexible helicop-
terborne task forces (H TFs). These forces can
project combat power throughout the entire depth,
width, and breadth of the modern battlefield with
little regard for terrain barriers. The unique versa-
tility and strength of an  HTF is achieved by com-
bining the capabilities of helicopters—speed,
agility, and firepower—with those of the infantry
and other combat arms to form tactically tailored
HTFs that can be employe d in low, medium, and
high intensity environments.
Helicopterborne operations  are not merely the
movement of Marines, weapons, and material by
helicopter units. They are deliberate, precisely
planned, and aggressively  executed combat oper-
ations that allow friendly forces to strike over ter-
rain barriers in order to  attack the enemy when
and where he is most vulnerable. 
Note
Helicopterborne operations are more than 
just air movement operations. Air movement 
operations require airlift assets outside of 
the assets used for helicopterborne opera-
tions. These operations are used to move 
troops and equipment; to emplace artillery 
and other combat support assets; and to 
transport ammunition, fuel, and supplies. 
Helicopterborne operations  span the spectrum of
risk. They can be high-payoff operations that can,
when properly planned and aggressively exe-
cuted, drastically extend a commander’s area of
operations. This extension of a commander’s area
of operations enables th e commander to execute
operations in areas ranging beyond the capabili-
ties of ground forces.
The speed and mobility of  helicopters can pro-
vide freedom of rapi d maneuver. Freedom of
rapid maneuver can then fix the enemy and mass
sufficient combat power to destroy him over dis-
tances that would othe rwise be impossible to
traverse as quickly. The helicopter’s flexibility
and versatility permit the ground commander to
reduce time and dist ance limitations normally
encountered in the ground movement of troops.
Sequence of Operations
A helicopterborne operation generally takes place
in the following sequence:
z Planning.
z Briefing.
z Loading.
z Air assault.
z Landing.
z Tactical ground operations.
z Sustainment.
z Ground linkup/air reposition.

--- Page 12 ---
1-2 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
Tactical Considerations 
In addition to utilizing the tact ical fundamentals
of ground combat, helicopterborne operations also
apply the following tactical considerations: 
z The HTF is assigned missions that take advan-
tage of its superior mobility, and it is not
employed in roles requ iring deliberate opera-
tions over an extended period of time.
z The HTF fights as a combined-arms team.
z Operational planning must  be centralized and
precise.
z Execution must be aggressive and decentralized.
z Helicopterborne forces lack tactical mobility
and heavy weapons; therefore, it is important
that the force lands on or near the objective.
The successful accomplishment of the mission
can be threatened if the force lands further
from the objective than planned, particularly if
the enemy has superior  ground mobi lity. Con-
sequently, the landing of a helicopterborne
force in any location other than the designated
landing zone (LZ) is ju stified only when land-
ing in the designated zone poses a threat to
force survival.
z Helicopterborne forces may operate in con-
junction with other ground forces or indepen-
dently. Helicopterborne forces enable the
commander to react quickly over the entire
depth and width of his area of responsibility.
z Helicopterborne operatio ns require a rapid
buildup of combat power on the ground; e.g.,
one-third of the helicopt erborne force’s assault
elements should be land ed in the initial wave
(for a battalion landin g, a minimum of one
company and for a company landing, a mini-
mum of one platoon). The actual size of the
assault wave is based on the threat and deter-
mined by the mission commander.
z Helicopters are an exce llent means of tactical
deception. When possible, helicopters can
make demonstration landi ngs in several differ-
ent zones during one flight to deceive the
enemy as to the true objective of an operation.
z Helicopterborne attacks are typically launched
against undefended or lig htly defended objec-
tives. If attacking a well-defended objective,
planners must select LZ s that are nearby and
support a safe landing of the force while ade-
quately suppressing enemy air defenses.
z Helicopterborne forces are vulnerable to attack
helicopters, fixed-wing aircraft, surface-to-air
missiles, and antiaircr aft artillery. To counter
this vulnerabil ity, fixed-wing and/or rotary-
wing aircraft escort the helicopterborne forces,
and use indirect fires to  suppress or neutralize
enemy air defenses. Suppression may also be
conducted by electronic attack.
z During a landing, helicopt erborne forces are
especially vulnerable a nd may be disorganized
for a short time.
z Air defense weapons are employed to counter
this vulnerability in the pickup zones (PZs) and
the LZs.
z Helicopterborne forces  should be employed
early to allow an early linkup with vehicular
support to enhance ground mobility and sus-
tainability. It is advisable to use the helicopter-
borne force as the stat ionary force during the
linkup because of itsli mited mobility while on
the ground.
z The increased mobility of a helicopterborne
force allows the commander to extend his area
of influence, but the following risks must be
considered:
„ Greater exposure to enemy ground fire and
enemy aircraft.
„ Possible loss of surprise.
„ Possible involvement with enemy reserves.
„ Increased vulnerability  to enemy counterat-
tack pending linkup with ground forces.
„ Decreased lines of communications.
z To execute successful deep helicopterborne
operations, the following must exist:
„ Detailed intelligence a nd objective area col-
lection assets.
„ Ability to move securely to the objective area
„ Ability to execute the mission without ground
lines of communications

--- Page 13 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 1-3 
„ Ability to provide aerial combat support and
combat service support (CSS).
„ Ability to withdraw forces if required.
z Due to the lack of ve hicles and other support
during the initial stages  of the helicopterborne
operation, Marines must  carry all necessary
supplies and equipmen t; therefore, command-
ers must ensure that only mission-essential
items are carried. The commander ensures that
other supplies and equipment are delivered at
the earliest opportunity. 
z Coordination is required between ground and
helicopter units involve d in a helicopterborne
operation; therefore, rehearsals are critical to
mission success. At a minimum, communica-
tions and actions in the PZs and LZs are
rehearsed.
z Command and control (C2)  is tailored for the
assigned mission. Ideally, the air mission com-
mander (AMC) and helicopterborne unit com-
mander (HUC) are collocated in a C2 platform.
This collocation may not always be possible
depending on the mission. 
z Due to the range of helicopterborne operations,
the use of airborne relay and C2 platforms
must be considered and the communications
plan must be simple, re dundant, and fully inte-
grate all elements of the force. See Marine
Corps Warfighting Publication (MCWP) 3-
40.3, Communications and Information Sys-
tems, appendix D, for a de scription of Marine
air-ground task force (MAGTF) radio nets that
can be used to provide the needed C2 links for
the helicopterborne force.
z Helicopterborne operations conducted during
adverse weather require  more planning and
preparation time.
z A unit’s tactical inte grity should be main-
tained throughout a helicopterborne operation.
z Fire support planning must provide for sup-
pressive fires along flight routes and in the
vicinity of LZs. The suppression of enemy air
defenses (SEAD) systems must be a priority
for fires.
z Helicopterborne forces are most effectively
employed in environments where limited lines
of communications are available to the enemy,
terrain limits the use of heavy ground forces,
and where the enemy lacks air superiority and
effective air defense systems.
z When infantry units conduct helicopterborne
operations, the HUC must determine the dispo-
sition of unit vehicles, attached vehicles, and
support vehicles. Vehicles may be—
„ Flown in with the helicopterborne force.
„ Flown in subsequent to  arrival of the heli-
copterborne force.
„ Driven in by ground mobile elements of the
helicopterborne force subsequent to the ini-
tial assault.
„ Attached to another ground unit (e.g., a link-
up force) for movement to the objective area.
„ Left in the assembly area until the helicop-
terborne force returns.
„ Staged in position to provide support for the
helicopterborne force or adjacent units.
Also see appendix A for the small-unit leader’s
guide to tactical PZ/LZ operations.
Command and Control
Helicopterborne operations require close coordi-
nation between the commander of the ground unit
to be lifted and the AMC. The AMC is an experi-
enced naval aviator typically operating from an
aircraft to direct airborne coordination and con-
trol of helicopterborne operations. When no
AMC has been designat ed, the assault flight
leader (AFL) performs th is function within his
capabilities. The follo wing coordination mea-
sures enhance command and control of helicop-
terborne operations:
z Coordination begins at the earliest opportunity
in the planning phase of the operation.
z When possible, both commanders are collo-
cated, normally via a C2 helicopter, during the
air movement and initial stages of the landing.

--- Page 14 ---
1-4 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
z The AMC’s primary responsibility is to coordi-
nate the air movement of personnel and equip-
ment into designated  LZs. The AMC supports
the ground commander’s concept of operations.
z While the air movement phase is primarily the
responsibility of the AMC, the ground com-
mander must be prepared to recommend pri-
mary and alternate approach and retirement
lanes. The ground co mmander must confirm
the proper LZ.
z It may become necessary to shift from primary
to alternate LZs or to alter the course of heli-
copter flights; therefore, the authority to
change to an alternate LZ must be established
as soon as LZs are sel ected. The shifting of an
LZ or lane usually impacts both the current
operation and other operations. When the use
of either LZ will not affect the scheme of
maneuver or plan of supporting fire of adjacent
units, the HUC, in coordination with the AMC
or AFL, may be delegated the authority to use
the alternate zone to e xploit a tactical advan-
tage or to improve the ground situation. If the
use of a selected zone will affect adjacent or
higher units, this author ity cannot be delegated
below the highest unit affected.
Helicopterborne Forces
Organization
The organization of forces may include some or
all of the elements of the MAGTF. 
Note
Throughout the remainder of this publica-
tion, the term HTF will include the ground 
combat element (GCE), aviation combat ele-
ment (ACE), combat service support element 
(CSSE), and command element forces used 
to conduct helicopterborne assault.
Since task organization is essential in the conduct
of helicopterborne operations, the helicopterborne
force, as a part of the MAGTF, is an integrated
force tailored to a specific mission under the com-
mand of a single commander. Typically, The
MAGTF commander direct s the formation of an
HTF and designates a mission commander. The
AMC, escort flight lead er (EFL), AFL, and HUC
are subordinate to the mission commander. To
exploit opportunities o ffered by an HTF, com-
manders and leaders must understand the princi-
ples upon which the HTF was organized and its
intent of employment. 
Task Organization Considerations
Planners must consider the following during task
organization of the helicopterborne force:
z Availability and allocation of aviation assets. 
z Task organization is determined and announced
early in the planning pr ocess; and it should be
included in the warning order.
z The helicopterborne force provides sufficient
combat power to seize initial objectives and
protect LZs.
z The helicopterborne fo rce requires a mission-
specific balance of m obility, combat power,
and sustaining power.
z The required combat power  is delivered to the
objective area as soon as possible, consistent
with aircraft and LZ capabilities, to provide
surprise and shock effect. 
z Ability of the helicopt erborne force to arrive
intact at the LZ (provi ding en route security,
throughout the entire flig ht route, and during
actions on the objective)  and to facilitate fol-
low-on operations.
z Development of an effective C2 system.
z Combat support elements are normally placed
in direct support to the helicopterborne force to
ensure close coordination and continuous, dedi-
cated support throughout an operation.

--- Page 15 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 1-5 
Capabilities
A helicopterborne force provides commanders
with unique capabilities. No other ground force on
the battlefield can respond to a tactical situation
and move considerable di stances as quickly as a
helicopterborne force. It can extend the battlefield,
move with great agility, and rapidly concentrate
combat power. Specif ically, helicopterborne
forces can—
z Attack enemy positions from any direction.
z Overfly or bypass barriers/obstacles and strike
objectives on otherwise inaccessible areas.
z Conduct deep attacks and raids beyond the for-
ward line of own troops (FLOT) or point of
contact by using helicopters to insert and
extract forces.
z Rapidly concentrate, di sperse, or redeploy to
extend the area of influence.
z Provide responsive reserves thereby allowing
commanders to commit a larger portion of their
forces to action.
z React rapidly to tact ical opportunities and
necessities.
z Conduct exploitation and pursuit operations.
z Rapidly place forces at  tactically decisive
points in the battle area.
z Provide surveillance or screen over a wide area.
z React to rear area threats.
z Rapidly secure and defe nd key terrain such as
crossing sites, road junctions, or bridges.
z Bypass enemy positions.
z Achieve surprise.
z Conduct operations under adverse weather
conditions and at night to facilitate deception
and surprise.
z Conduct fast-paced operations over extended
distances.
z Conduct economy of forc e operations over a
wide area.
z Rapidly reinforce/sustain committed units.
Limitations
A helicopterborne force is  light and mobile, and
it relies on helicopter support throughout the
operation. As such, it may be limited by—
z Severe weather and winds.
z Extreme temperatures.
z Reliance on air lines of communications.
z Enemy aircraft, air de fense, and electronic
warfare (EW) action.
z Reduced ground mobility once inserted.
z Availability of suitable LZs and PZs.
z Available nuclear, bi ological, and chemical
(NBC) protection and decontamination capa-
bility.
z Reduced vehicle-moun ted antitank weapon
systems.
z Battlefield obscuration.
z High fuel and ammunition consumption rates.
z Limited accessibility to supporting arms, espe-
cially indirect fires.
Another critical helicopterborne operation’s plan-
ning consideration is the inherent trade off
between the range a heli copter can fly and the
fuel, troops, and cargo it can carry. Therefore, the
following factors impact distance, fuel, and carry-
ing abilities:
z Weather conditions at the PZ and LZ deter-
mine the maximum weight (i.e., fuel, troops,
cargo) a helicopter can safely lift.
z The fuel load determines  the distance the heli-
copter can fly.
z The distance of the mission determines the fuel
required. 
z The remaining excess payl oad after fuel deter-
mines how many troop s and cargo can be
moved the desired distance. 
z Movement of a desire d number of troops and
cargo determines the remaining payload avail-
able for fuel.

--- Page 16 ---
1-6 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
z The use of en route refueling via forward arm-
ing and refueling point (FARP) or aerial refuel-
ing can minimize the tr ade off between range
and payload.
Vulnerabilities
Helicopterborne forces use the helicopter to move
and close with the enem y. Initial assault ele-
ments must be light and mobile; therefore, they
are often separated from heavy weapon systems,
supporting arms, equipmen t, and materiel that
provide protection and survivability on the battle-
field. A helicopterborne force is particularly vul-
nerable to—
z Attack by enemy air defense weapon systems
during the movement phase.
z Attack by NBC systems,  because of limited
NBC protection and decontamination.
z Attacks (ground, air, or  artillery) during the
loading and unloading phases and at other
times when infantry is not dug in.
z Electronic attack due to heavy reliance on radio
communications for command and control.

--- Page 17 ---
CHAPTER 2
PREPARATION FOR COMBAT
Helicopterborne forces must prepare for combat
operations by following tr oop leading procedures
and organizing for a specific mission. This chap-
ter discusses procedures and organizations that
provide a basis for detailed discussion of helicop-
terborne operations in later chapters. The follow-
ing paragraphs discuss combat preparation
procedures for helicopterborne operations:
z Intelligence preparati on of the battlespace
(IPB).
z Threat.
z Task organization.
Intelligence Preparation of the Battlespace
IPB’s main purpose is to support commanders
and their staffs in the decisionmaking process. It
integrates enemy doctrine  with the weather and
terrain, the mission, and the specific battlefield
environment in order to produce a graphic intelli-
gence estimate that po rtrays probable enemy
courses of action. Because of aircraft vulnerabil-
ity during helicopterborne  operations, IPB’s sys-
tematic approach to analyzing the enemy,
weather, and terrain in a specific geographic area
makes it critical to heli copterborne operations.
The four steps of IPB are—
z Define the battlespace environment.
z Describe the battlespace’s effects.
z Evaluate the threat.
z Determine threat courses of action.
Once hostilities begin an d current information
becomes available, the IPB estimate becomes
dynamic, changing with th e immediate situation
on the battlefield. See Marine Corps Reference
Publication (MCRP) 2-12A, Intelligence Prepa-
ration of the Battlespace , for a detailed discus-
sion of this process.
Threat
Threat capabilities vary  based on the enemy and
the situation. However, there are basic threats to
helicopterborne operations that will not change:
z Air defense fires, including small arms fires,
must be identified and addressed by effective
suppressive measures and increased emphasis
on accurate and timely enemy intelligence.
z Fixed-wing and rotary-w ing aircraft capabili-
ties and limitations within the area of opera-
tions must be understo od and measures taken
to minimize the risk of encounter.
z EW capabilities, to in clude jamming, direction
finding and monitoring of communications/
radars, must be considered and appropriate
countermeasures employed.
z Threat actions to c ounter PZ/LZ operations
(analyze threat capabilitie s that could interdict
friendly PZs/LZs with ground forces, indirect
fires, and aerial attack).
Planners and commanders must constantly evalu-
ate the threat in terms of the forms of contact
available to the threat force. Forms of contact
include observation, indirect fire, direct fire (to
include air defense fires), obstacles, NBC, air,
reserve forces, and EW . Countering the threat
requires knowledge of enemy doctrine, tactics,
and equipment and the capability to find and
exploit enemy weak point s with helicopterborne
forces. IPB provides co mmanders and planners
with an analytical me thodology that reduces

--- Page 18 ---
2-2 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
uncertainty concerning th e enemy, the environ-
ment, and the terrain in order to determine and
exploit enemy weaknesses.
Task Organization
Task-organized HTFs conduct helicopterborne
operations. This task orga nization involves orga-
nizing both ground and aviation assets and
requires coordination, planning, and execution
between both ground co mmanders and aviation
commanders to execute the ground tactical plan. 
Note
Normally there is only one ground element 
in a helicopterborne operation although 
units may be landed in different locations.
The force is structured around an infantry unit
and can vary in size from a reinforced rifle com-
pany to a reinforced Marine regiment. The HTF
is normally part of a MAGTF and designed to
accomplish a specific mission.
The MAGTF commander normally directs the
formation of an HTF and allocates dedicated air
resources. The MAGTF commander designates
and assigns the mission commander. The mission
commander allocates assets and defines authority
and responsibility by de signating command and
support relationships. The mission commander
ensures that ground ope rations are conducted
according to the commande r’s intent and assists
the commander in integrating the helicopterborne
operation into the overa ll operational plan. Com-
bat support and CSS are task-organized to pro-
vide the full range of  support necessary to
accomplish the helicopterborne mission. Com-
manders supporting the helicopterborne operation
ensure that support operations are conducted
according to the needs of  the total helicopter-
borne force, to include  both ground and support-
ing aviation units.
Aviation support is task organized to fully sup-
port all facets of the helicopterborne operation.
Aviation support includes all or a portion of the
six functions of Marine  aviation in varying
degrees, based on the tac tical situation and the
helicopterborne force’ s mission. The designated
AMC ensures that all su pporting operations are
executed in a manner th at best supports the
ground tactical plan.
An HTF exists until completion of a specific mis-
sion. The MAGTF comma nder or designated
mission commander establishes the criteria that
constitutes mission co mpletion under which the
aviation elements can return to their parent unit.
Table 2-1 identifies specific organization, roles,
and missions based on task organization.

--- Page 19 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 2-3 
Table 2-1. Task Organization of Helicopterborne Operations.
Asset Organization Role Mission
Infantry Units typically form nucleus of HTF.
Units range from reinforced com-
pany through reinforced regiment.
Units must prepare to assume heli-
copterborne missions.
Operate under the control of the HUC in 
direct support role to the HTF.
As directed by the HTF mission 
commander.
Assault Support Helicopters One or more reinforced helicopter 
squadrons support the HTF.
Operate under the control of the AMC in 
a direct support role to the HTF.
Combat assault transport providing 
tactical mobility for troops, equip-
ment, and weapon systems by 
internal and external load.
Aerial resupply by internal and 
external load.
Recovery and evacuation of equip-
ment.
Casualty evacuation or other air 
evacuation.
Dedicated or hasty tactical recovery 
of aircraft and personnel.
Attack Helicopters Task organized. Operate under the control of the AMC in 
a direct support role to the HTF.
Fire support against point targets 
and/or antiarmor operations (e.g., 
air interdiction, close air support).
Armed escort for assault support 
operations.
SEAD artillery and other weapons 
en route to and during insertions 
and/or extractions.
Observation of the LZ and objective 
areas to neutralize enemy resis-
tance and to block enemy attempts 
to reinforce the objective area.
Escort for tactical recovery of air-
craft and personnel (TRAP) forces 
and/or security for downed aircraft.
Armed and visual reconnaissance.
Fire support and coordination and 
terminal control for supporting arms 
forward air controller (airborne) 
(FAC[A]).

--- Page 20 ---
2-4 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
Utility Helicopters Task organized. Operate under the control of the AMC in 
a direct support role to the HTF.
Enhance command, control, and 
communications capability for the 
HTF.
Fire support against point targets 
(close air support).
Armed escort for assault support 
operations.
Observation of the LZ and objective 
areas to neutralize enemy resis-
tance and to block enemy attempts 
to reinforce the objective area.
Rescue escort for TRAP and secu-
rity for downed aircraft.
Armed and visual reconnaissance.
Fire support coordination and termi-
nal control for supporting arms 
(FAC[A]).
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Task organized. Operate under the control of the AMC in 
a direct support role to the HTF.
Reconnaissance of PZs, flight 
routes, LZs, and objectives.
Forward observation (or all around) 
of ground forces to provide limited 
early warning.
Artillery Fire Support Normally, an artillery battalion pro-
vides support; however, artillery 
batteries may be required.
Operate under the control of the mis-
sion commander in a direct support or 
attached role to the HTF. 
Provide rapid response capability to 
prepared LZs and objectives.
Provide suppression of enemy artillery 
and air defense fires.
Disruption of threat artillery/indirect 
fires.
SEAD along flight routes and in the 
vicinity of LZs.
LZ preparation.
Screening fires.
Deception fires.
Artillery raids/aerial repositioning.
Delivery of family of scatterable 
mines.
Objective preparation and/or 
suppression.
Air Defense Task-organized low altitude air 
defense (LAAD) assets.
Operate under the control of the mis-
sion commander in coordination with 
the AMC in a direct support or attached 
role to the HTF.
Equipped with light, air-transportable, 
short-range, man-portable air defense 
systems in order to fly with the lead 
assault elements and provide protec-
tion in the objective area.
Air defense of high value locations 
including PZ, LZ, objective areas, 
helicopter FARPs, and holding sites.
Direct fires for ground defense.
Table 2-1. Task Organization of Helicopterborne Operations.
Asset Organization Role Mission

--- Page 21 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 2-5 
Engineers Units range from platoon through 
company.
Operate in a direct support role to the 
HTF. Typically, engineers are attached 
to infantry units during unit movement, 
but revert to general support once 
communications with parent HQs are 
re-established.
Organize to move with the infantry and 
provide mobility, countermobility, and 
survivability construction equipment.
Provide light engineering support if 
heavy-lift helicopters are available.
Construction and improvement of 
PZs and LZs.
Construction of expedient counter-
mobility obstacles using natural 
materials and demolitions.
Construction of firing positions.
Clearance of obstacles/minefields.
Emplacement of minefields.
Conduct of assault and covert 
breaches.
Combat.
Electronic Warfare Task organized. Provide EW planning and operations 
support to the HTF.
Electronic attack.
Disruption of enemy command, con-
trol, and communications.
Degradation of enemy fire support 
and air defense radio nets.
EW support.
Collection of electronic intelligence.
Reserve Elements Task organized. Provide reinforcement or assumption of 
another unit’s mission.
As required.
CSSE Task organized. Provide mission-specific support to the 
HTF throughout the operation.
As directed by the HTF mission 
commander.
Table 2-1. Task Organization of Helicopterborne Operations.
Asset Organization Role Mission

--- Page 22 ---
CHAPTER 3
COMMAND AND CONTROL
Command and control is th e process of directing
and controlling the activities of a military force in
order to obtain an obj ective. Since the bat-
tlespace over which the helicopterborne force
operates may extend beyond the typical bat-
tlespace of a company- through regiment-sized
force, operational command and control must be
given special considerations.
A helicopterborne C2 system must communicate
orders, coordinate  support, and pr ovide direction
to the helicopterborne forc e in spite of great dis-
tances, enemy interference,  and the potential loss
of key facilities  and individuals. Above all, this
system must function quickly and effectively,
thus allowing the helicopterborne force to receive
and process information and to make decisions
faster than the enemy. An  effective helicopter-
borne C2 system includes  the procedures, facili-
ties, equipment, and pers onnel required to gather
information, make plans,  communicate changes,
and control all ground and air elements in pursuit
of the objective.
Planning
The MAGTF commander addresses C2 require-
ments and establishes an effective C2 system
early in the planning phase. An effective helicop-
terborne C2 system allows the MAGTF com-
mander to direct diverse, widely dispersed air and
ground elements between the initial PZ and the
final objective. Since helicopterborne operations
are subject to degraded communications due to
the extended distance from which they operate,
the MAGTF commander must develop a C2 plan
and system that allow execution of the mission
despite degraded radio communications. The key
to successful helicopterborne command and con-
trol lies in effective task organization, precise
planning, decentralized ex ecution, and the use of
helicopterborne radio nets. See chapter 4 for
detailed planning information.
Effective Task Organization
All assets must be tailored into discrete, task-
organized elements, each with two-way radio
communications, unity of command, clearly
defined missions and obje ctives, and provisions
for maintaining unit integrity throughout the
operation. An effective task organization, with
each element having a clearly defined mission,
allows the HTF the flexibility to decentralize exe-
cution and ensures mission success despite
degraded communications, the fog of battle, or
unexpected enemy reaction.
Precise Planning
Helicopterborne operations must be precisely
planned and well briefed before execution so that
each subordinate leader knows exactly what is
expected, knows the comm ander’s intent, and
knows that the mission can be executed despite
the loss of radio comm unications. Contingencies
or alternatives must be  built into each plan to
allow for continuation of the mission in a fluid
operational environment. 
Typically, precise planni ng is done through the
use of time driven or ev ent driven actions. Time
driven actions occur at specific times. Event
driven actions occur rela tive to each other. For
example, a time driven ac tion is the firing of an
LZ artillery preparation precisely from H-5 min-
utes to H-1 minutes. If previously planned, this
can be executed with degraded communications.

--- Page 23 ---
3-2 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
An example of an event driven action is the inser-
tion of one company into the alternate LZ if the
lead company makes enem y contact on the pri-
mary LZ. If previously planned, this event occurs
as expected and withou t the need for lengthy
radio communications.
Decentralized Execution
Although it is centrally planned, the execution of
a helicopterborne operation is decentralized. Sub-
ordinate commanders are given the maximum
possible freedom of action (consistent with safety
and mission accomplishment considerations) to
ensure mission accomplishment.
Helicopterborne Radio Nets
Radio nets that facili tate ground-to-ground, air-
to-air, and ground-to-air  communications are
established to provide for the timely flow of
information and redundanc y in capability. This
helps reduce, if not eliminate, the loss or degrada-
tion of communications.
Airborne Command and Control
The ability to place comm and and control in the
air allows the mission commander to personally
influence the operation, communicate with subor-
dinates, and arrive at a timely decision. The mis-
sion commander and hi s staff are positioned
where they can best support the mission and,
sometimes, this may be airborne in a C2 plat-
form with the AMC or in  an assault support heli-
copter with the AFL. In a large helicopterborne
operation with multiple  LZs, subordinate com-
manders may also require C2 helicopters to con-
trol and coordinate their units.
Typically, the mission commander commands
airborne only during air movement and the initial
stages of the landing. When a major portion of
the assault elements have landed, the mission
commander displaces to a forward command post
on the ground. The mission commander should
avoid routinely contro lling ground operations
from the air. This can lead  to over supervision of
subordinate units and can sometimes give an
inaccurate picture of the true tactical situation.
Appendix B summarizes the essential items
included in the planni ng phase of helicopter-
borne operations.
Mission Commander
The MAGTF commander allocates assets, defines
both authority and respon sibility by designating
command and support rela tionships, and desig-
nates the time that the HT F is estab lished. The
MAGTF commander may be the mission com-
mander depending on the scope of the helicopter-
borne operation or may designate a mission
commander. The MAGTF commander desig-
nates a mission commander as follows: 
z If a regiment HTF is designated, the regimental
commander is the mission commander.
z If a battalion HTF is designated, the battalion
commander is the mission commander.
z If a company HTF is designated, the battalion
commander is the mission commander. 
The mission commander ex ercises command via
the established comman d and support relation-
ships, is responsible fo r the planning and execu-
tion of all aspects of the assigned mission, and
determines when the HTF is disbanded.
For a regiment HTF, the mission commander
may designate the commanding officer of the
main effort as the HUC or may designate each of
the battalion commanders as subordinate mission
commanders. This provides  a standard, yet flexi-
ble, C2 architecture that is scalable and meets the
requirements for any mis sion or contingency for

--- Page 24 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 3-3 
which an HTF might be employed. The role of
the mission commander is  to ensure a unity of
command throughout the operation.
Air Mission Commander
The commander of the aviation unit tasked to
support the helicopterborne  operation designates
the AMC. The AMC is th e Marine aviator desig-
nated by the commander of the aviation unit
tasked to support a helicopterborne operation.
Depending on the size an d scope of the MAGTF,
he may also be the AC E commander. Unless the
mission commander is the MAGTF commander,
there will not be a command relationship between
the mission commander and the AMC. In some
cases, the mission commander exercises tactical
control of assigned avia tion assets; that is, he
may direct and control the movements or maneu-
vers necessary to accomplish missions or tasks
assigned. During the plan ning phase, the AMC is
co-equal to the HUC. During execution, specific
authority is delegated from the mission com-
mander to the AMC. The AMC typically works
in direct support of th e mission commander and
answers directly to the mission commander’s
requests for assistance and support. The sup-
ported-supporting relationships and the means by
which they are executed are critical to mission
success; therefore, the AMC must have a detailed
understanding of the command and support rela-
tionships with key subordinates (e.g., AFL, EFL).
The AMC is responsible for the planning and
execution of all aviation f unctions relative to the
assigned helicopterborn e mission; therefore he
must be an experienced av iator. It is the AMC’s
responsibility to establish liaison with the mission
commander and HUC (the commander responsi-
ble for the ground tactical  plan) in order to con-
duct concurrent and para llel planning. The AMC
shall assume the duties  of the assault support
coordinator (airborne) (ASC[A]) of a mission if
no ASC(A) is assigned.
Helicopterborne Unit Commander
The HUC is a ground officer who has been desig-
nated as the commander of the helicopterborne
force:
z For a regiment HTF, the HUC is either the
main effort battalion commander or any battal-
ion commander as otherwise stipulated.
z For a battalion HTF, the HUC is either the
commanding officer of the main effort com-
pany or any company commander as other-
wise stipulated.
z For a company HTF, the company commander
is the HUC. 
As such, the HUC is char ged with executing and
accomplishing the ground tac tical plan and with
coordinating av iation and the other support
required to plan and execu te the helicopterborne
mission. The HUC’s unit composes the helicopter
landing force. Normally , there is only one HUC
commanding a single helicopterborne unit
although there may be multiple lifts and land-
ings. As in any operation, the HUC must move in
order to see the battlefi eld and where he can con-
trol the operation. Depending on the situation, the
HUC can be airborne during the movement and
insertion phases. At ot her times, the HUC fights
the battle from a tactical command post deployed
well forward. The HUC is subordinate to the mis-
sion commander and co-equal to the AMC dur-
ing the planning phase . During execution,
specific authority is delegated from the mission
commander to the HUC.
Assault Flight Leader
The AFL is an experienced aviator in command
of the assault support fl ight. The AFL reports to
the AMC and assists in the planning of flight
routes, LZs, and all other facets of the helicopter-
borne mission that direct ly involve assault sup-
port aircraft. The AFL is subordinate to the AMC

--- Page 25 ---
3-4 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
and is co-equal to the EFL during the planning
phase. During execution, specific authority is del-
egated from the AMC to the AFL. (See app. C for
a checklist to assist with planning.)
Escort Flight Leader
The EFL is an experien ced aviator in command
of the escort flight. Th e EFL reports to the AMC
and assists in the planning  of LZ preparation, fire
support planning, threat mitigation, and all other
facets of the helicopterborne mission that directly
involve attack aircraft. The EFL is subordinate to
the AMC and is co-equal  to the AFL during the
planning phase. During execution, specific
authority is delegated from the AMC to the EFL. 
Assault Support Coordinator (Airborne)
The ASC(A), an experien ced aviator operating
from an aircraft, is delega ted the authority to per-
form specific coordina tion and control functions
of helicopter operations and to provide situational
awareness to the helic opterborne force during a
specific evolution. Typi cally, the ASC(A) pro-
vides information concerning—
z Weather along the appr oach and retirement
routes and in the LZs.
z Observed enemy operations that may affect the
HTF mission.
z Changes to helicopter routes.
z Changes in the friendly situation.
z Employment of supporting arms, to include
tactical air coordinator (airborne) (TAC[A])
activities.
The ASC(A) may directly support a mission com-
mander or be employed as  an extension of the
direct air support center (DASC) or helicopter
direction center to c oordinate a ssault support
activities that do not wa rrant the assignment of a
mission commander. If employed as an extension
of the DASC/helicopter direction center, these
agencies assign specific functions to the ASC(A)
(e.g., initial assaults, subsequent assaults). 
The ASC(A) is also responsible for coordinating
the activities of all helicopters in his assigned
area. If employed in conjunction with the
TAC(A) or FAC(A), an d no mission commander
is assigned, the relations hip with the ASC(A) is
established by the tactic al air commander or his
designated representative. When an ASC(A) has
not been designated, the AMC discharges the
duties of the ASC(A) within the limits of his
authority. To facilitate timely and coordinated
decisions affecting helicopterborne assaults, the
ASC(A) and a representative of the HUC should
be assigned to the same aircraft if feasible. 
Tactical Air Coordinator (Airborne)
The TAC(A) is an exte nsion of the DASC and
coordinates with the ground commander’s tacti-
cal air control part y (TACP); subordinate
FAC(A); and the mortars, artillery, and naval
gunfire shore fire control parties. Normally, the
TAC(A) is the senior coordinator having the
authority over all aircra ft operation within his
assigned area. 
Forward Air Controller (Airborne)
The FAC(A) is an avia tor and forward air con-
troller (FAC) who is airborne (in either a helicop-
ter or fixed-wing aircraft) in the area of
operations. The FAC(A) is an extension of the
TACP and his primary function is the detection
and destruction of enem y targets through close
air support (CAS) and deep air support. The
FAC(A) is assigned as either direct support of a
ground unit or as a subordi nate to the TAC(A) or
ASC(A) that provides air control as required. The

--- Page 26 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 3-5 
FAC(A) performs the following tasks within his
assigned area of responsibility:
z Detects enemy targets for suppression, neutral-
ization, and destruction.
z Controls CAS missions.
z Performs strike coordination and armed recon-
naissance when directed.
z Controls LZ preparations.
z Marks targets and LZs.
z Controls mortar, artil lery, and naval gunfire
missions when required.
z Conducts visual reconnaissance.
z Reports intelligence information to the appro-
priate ground or air control agency.
Initial Terminal Guidance Teams
Initial terminal guidance  (ITG) teams from the
force reconnaissance company or reconnaissance
battalion, Marine divi sion, have the inherent
capability to provide te rminal guidance for the
initial helicopter waves in the LZs. However, all
ground units must be trained, equipped, and capa-
ble of performing ITG for small helicopter land-
ings. ITG teams are comp rised of personnel who
are inserted into LZs in advance of the landing
zone control team, and they may be the first ele-
ments to make contact with the enemy. Therefore,
they must promptly report any enemy activity that
may influence the land ing. ITG teams execute
prelanding reconnaissance tasks and establish and
operate signal devices that  guide the initial heli-
copter waves from the initial point to the LZ. The
use of ITG teams may increase the difficulty or
even prevent the use of LZ preparation fires due
to the presence of friendly troops in or around the
LZ. Duties of the team may include—
z Determining obstructions in the LZs, includ-
ing radiological hazards.
z Giving advance notice of enemy positions.
z Selecting PZs/LZs.
z Marking LZs for day and night.
z Recommending use of alternate LZs.
z Controlling supporting arms.
z Recommending actions to be taken by follow-
ing waves.
z Organizing an area around the zone to stage
troops, equipment, or su pplies to be picked up
or moved upon landing.
z Selecting an initial point near the LZ.
z Establishing communications with approach-
ing flight.
z Giving an LZ brief (see app. D) to the flight
leader.
Helicopter Support Team 
The helicopter support team (HST) is a task orga-
nization whose composition is formed and
equipped for employment  in PZs and LZs. These
teams facilitate the pick up, movement, and land-
ing of helicopterborne  troops, equipment and
supplies, and the evacuation of selected casualties
and prisoners of war (P OWs). The team usually
includes a headquarters element, a helicopter
control element, and an  LZ platoon. The LZ pla-
toon provides supply and engineer support func-
tions. The helicopter control element consists of a
landing zone control team provided by the ACE
commander when necessary and may include per-
sonnel to provide refuel ing and emergency main-
tenance. The landing zone control team may be
task-organized from the Marine air traffic con-
trol detachment when th e size or scope of the
operation warrants and the MAGTF commander
determines it is necessar y. The Marine air traffic
control detachment tasks may include—
z Installing and operating ai r traffic control and
navigational systems required for the control of
aircraft at expeditiona ry airfields and remote
landing sites.
z Providing air traffic control services that facili-
tate the safe, orderly, expeditious flow of air-
craft within designated terminal/landing areas.
z Maintaining the capabili ty to deploy indepen-
dent air traffic control teams/units.

--- Page 27 ---
3-6 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
Pickup Zone Control Officer
Typically, the HUC designates a pickup zone
control officer (PZCO) (either a FAC or air
officer) from the supported unit of each PZ. The
PZCO organizes, controls, and coordinates opera-
tions in the PZ and pushes elements out of the
PZ. He operates on a desi gnated tactical net and
is prepared to assist in executing needed changes.
The PZCO is the key individual during night
operations or when multiple subordinate elements
are being lifted from the same PZ.
Subordinate Unit Commanders
Subordinate unit commanders are attached to the
HUC and normally function as they would in any
other infantry task for ce. Each subordinate unit
commander must be prep ared to receive other
elements for movement.
Command Post
The command post provi des command and con-
trol for the execution of helicopterborne opera-
tions. It must be mobile  and well forward. It is
normally helicopter lifted into the objective area
soon after the initial echelon. A C2 helicopter
may serve as a command post if enemy air
defense systems allow.
Combat Operations Center
The combat operations ce nter is normally estab-
lished in the command post . It provides planning
for future operations and ongoing operations as
directed by the commanding officer. Functions of
the combat operations center include—
z Monitoring current operations and maintain-
ing current enemy and friendly situations.
z Gathering and disseminating intelligence.
z Keeping higher and ad jacent organizations
informed of the friendly situation.
z Submitting recurring reports.
z Providing liaison to high er and adjacent orga-
nizations.
z Establishing a fire su pport coordination center
(FSCC).
z Coordinating combat s upport, aviation, engi-
neer, and air defense. 
z Advising the commander on the use of combat
support for current and future operations.
z Monitoring airspace and coordinating support-
ing fires.
z Continuing planning for future operations and
overseeing the preparatio n of all contingency
plans.
z Issuing combat/warning orders as necessary.
Rear Area Operations
The rear area provides uninterrupted support to the
force as a whole. Both operational level and tacti-
cal level logistic  operations occu r within the rear
area. Typically, the HTF is not assigned a rear area
responsibility. Rather, it stages and launches from
the rear area of its hi gher headquarters. A CSSE
assigned to the HTF will likely collocate with the
logistic trains of this headquarters to facilitate the
coordination of support to the HTF.

--- Page 28 ---
CHAPTER 4
PLANNING
During the planning phase  of the helicopterborne
operation, it is essentia l that coordination among
the mission commander, HUC, and AMC begin
as soon as possible. While the HUC and AMC
must plan the operatio n together, the mission
commander’s and HUC’s ground concept of
operations drives all planning for the helicopter-
borne operation. The battalio n is the lowest level
that has sufficient personn el to plan, coordinate,
and control a helicopt erborne operation. When
company-sized operations are conducted, the
bulk of the planning and air-ground asset coordi-
nation takes place at the battalion headquarters.
Helicopterborne operations require the develop-
ment of five basic plan s: ground tactical plan,
landing plan, air moveme nt plan, loading plan,
and staging plan. The HUC  directs the formula-
tion of the ground tactical  plan, the landing plan,
and the loading plan. Th e AFL is principally
responsible for formulating the air movement
plan. During planning of a helicopterborne opera-
tion, one primary consid eration for the HUC and
AMC is the enemy air de fense situation. Other
planning considerations include, but are not lim-
ited to, sortie rates and aircraft types, availabil-
ity, and capabilities. 
To achieve the necessary , rapid buildup of com-
bat power, a helicopterborne operation requires
the massing of helicopters . As a planning figure,
a minimum of one third of the ground unit must
be landed in the zone in the first wave, but should
always be based on a detailed assessment of the
threat within the objective area.
The basis for planning the timing of the opera-
tion is L-hour-the time when the first assault heli-
copter in the first wave touches down in the LZ.
SECTION I. ESTIMATION PROCESS
A vital portion of planni ng is the estimation pro-
cess. The following are actions that are impor-
tant parts of the estimation pr ocess. Some of
these actions are required to initiate the estima-
tion process, some actions are initiated to keep
the estimation process in a continual, progressive
state based on the evolut ion of the operation, and
some actions are options for the commander to
implement based on the battle situation.
z The helicopterborne force uses command and
staff actions and troop leading procedures
common to other combat operations to execute
planning.
z Planning of helicopter borne operations is as
detailed as time permits, and, if time allows,
complete written orders and plans are devel-
oped. However, if a t actical opportunity does
not allow detailed planning, then rapid plan-
ning is used and the planning steps are com-
pressed or conducted concurrently and detailed
written plans and orders are replaced with
standing operating procedures (SOPs) or les-
sons learned. See append ix E for a sample bat-
talion SOP.
z Information flow is cr itical to the successful
completion of a heli copterborne operation.
Information is receive d from higher headquar-
ters and all echelons provide information
intended to reduce the pl anning burden of sub-
ordinate units.

--- Page 29 ---
4-2 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
z All tactical estimates used in troop leading pro-
cedures employ the factors of mission, enemy,
terrain and weather, troops and support avail-
able–time available (METT-T). Analysis of
METT-T provides data that is used during the
estimation process to reach a decision.
Analysis of METT-T
The analysis of METT-T is an important part of
the estimation process because it formulates the
design of the co mmander’s plan of attack and
contributes signifi cantly to the estimate of the
tactical situation for helicopterborne operations.
Appendix F provides a gu ide for detailed, pre-
cise reverse planning.
Mission
Mission analysis is conducted early in the estima-
tion process. The mission includes the critical
tasks that must be acco mplished. The tasks are
either specified tasks stated by the order or
implied tasks determin ed by the commander.
Mission analysis  determines not only what must
be accomplished, but also the intent of the com-
mander ordering the mission.  It also states the
restraints and constrai nts placed on the mission
by the higher headquarters. This analysis pro-
vides the basis for task organization and must be
conducted to determine if it is more advantageous
to strike with a helic opterborne force or attack
with a ground force. To analyze the mission, the
following questions must be asked:
z Does the mission require  the rapid massing or
shifting of combat power over an extended dis-
tance?
z Does the mission require surprise?
z Does the mission require the flexibility, mobil-
ity, and speed afforded by helicopters? 
z Since helicopterborne operations are inherently
a high risk operation th at can yield a high pay-
off, does the payoff warrant the risk?
z What is the level of training? See appendix G.
Enemy
The evaluation of the en emy defines the enemy’s
capabilities and most pr obable courses of action.
The following factors ab out the enemy must be
considered:
z Identification: Who is he?
z Location: Where is he? Where is he going?
z Disposition: How is he  organized? What are
his formations?
z Strength: What are his strengths versus
friendly forces strengths?
z Morale: What are his esprit, experience, state
of training, and regular or reserve forces?
z Capabilities: What are the obstacles, indirect
fires, direct fires, observation, NBC, air,
reserve forces, and EW?
z Composition: What is  his armor, infantry
(motorized or light), ar tillery, and combat sup-
port?
z Probable courses of actio n: What is his likely
mission or objective? How will he probably
achieve it? (Think about the most probable
course of action and most dangerous course of
action.)
When planning a helicopterborne operation, the
following factors about the enemy must be con-
sidered:
z Enemy air defense weapons and capabilities.
z Enemy mobility; particularly the ability to influ-
ence potential flight routes and helicopter LZs.
z Enemy NBC capability; part icularly the ability
to react to the insertion.
z Capability to interdict or interrupt helicopter
movements with enemy helicopters or fixed-
wing aircraft.
z Enemy EW capability.
Terrain and Weather
In all military operations, terrain analysis is con-
ducted by the criteria de scribed in the acronym
OCOKA-W [observation and fields of fire, cover
and concealment, obstacles, key terrain, avenues of
approach, weather]. In helicopterborne operations,

--- Page 30 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 4-3 
these factors must be anal yzed in relation to their
effects on the force duri ng movement to the PZ,
loading, air movement, LZ insertion, movement to
the objective, and subsequent actions.
Observation and Fields of Fire
The following considera tions relate to both
enemy and friendly forces:
z Enemy visual observation and/or electronic
surveillance of PZs, flight routes, and LZs.
z Enhanced friendly obs ervation provided by
aerial and ground reconnaissance assets.
z Ease of navigation along flight routes particu-
larly for night or adverse weather operations.
z Ability to influence the PZs, LZs, and flight
routes with indirect and direct fire.
Cover and Concealment
The following considerations relate to the cover
and concealment of friendly forces:
z Terrain masking for low le vel flight routes and
insertions.
z Covered battle positions for attack helicopters.
z PZs and LZs that offer ground forces cover and
concealment.
Obstacles
While helicopters can bypass most obstacles, PZs
and LZs must be free of natural and/or manmade
obstacles that c ould preclude a he licopter land-
ing or affect the ground scheme of maneuver.
Key Terrain
The possession of key terr ain provides a decided
advantage to a force and, in many instances, is
mission-dependent. Howeve r, in helicopterborne
operations, key terrain is not limited to that which
influences the ground scheme of maneuver. It
must also be analyzed in terms of—
z PZs and LZs.
z Flight routes.
z Attack helicopter battle positions.
z Occupation of enemy positions, especially
enemy air defense assets.
z Potential FARPs.
Avenues of Approach
Air and ground avenues of approach are consid-
ered in both offensive and defensive operations
from both friendly and enemy viewpoints. A
good avenue of approach for a helicopterborne
force offers–
z A reasonable degree of mobility and few if any
natural or manmade obstacles to the aircraft.
z Little or no canalization.
z Terrain masking that decreases effectiveness of
enemy air defense weapons.
z Cover.
z Concealment.
z Good lines of communication and logistics.
z Ease of link up with other forces when appro-
priate.
Weather
Weather can greatly impact an operation. Changes
in the weather may resu lt in an interruption of
helicopter support and require changes in planned
operations. Considerations include–
z Fog, low clouds, heavy ra in, and other factors
that limit visibility for pilots.
z Illumination and moon angle during night
vision device (NVD) operations.
z Ice, sleet, and freezi ng rain may cause ice
accumulation on airframes, which can become
catastrophic.
z High temperatures and/or density altitudes that
degrade aircraft engine  performance and lift
capability.
z Darkness, normally an  advantage to well-
trained pilots and ground forces.
z High winds (large gust spreads).
z Weather conditions that  create hazards on PZs
and LZs, such as blowing dust, sand, or snow.

--- Page 31 ---
4-4 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
Troops and Support Available
Troops and support available encompasses not
only troops to be lifted into the objective LZ but
also all combat power to  include combat support
and CSS available to th e helicopterborne force.
The helicopterborne force should have enough
combat power relative to the threat to seize ini-
tial objectives and protect the LZs until follow-on
echelons arrive in the objective area, and helicop-
ter lift capability is th e single most important
variable in determini ng how combat power can
be introduced into the objective area.
Aircrew endurance must al so be considered. For
planning purposes, the AF L usually considers 8
hours of flight time with in a 24-hour period for
dual-piloted aircraft to  be a safe limit for air-
crews. Day and night oper ations may require dif-
ferent day endurance cons iderations for the crew.
If those limits are exce eded during a single
period, then degraded aircrew performance can
be expected.
Time Available
The time available to prepare for a helicopter-
borne operation is extremely important. It is often
the scarcest resource an d is vital to planning.
The commander must ad just the planning pro-
cess to make optimum us e of this perishable
resource. When time is  critical, the commander’s
intuition, judgment, and experience are invalu-
able in guiding his staf f and subordinate com-
manders. This planning  must be coordinated
between the GCE and th e ACE. While the ACE
is preparing its aircrews , servicing its aircraft,
and planning its flights, the GCE is also prepar-
ing for its mission. On ce the GCE’s and ACE’s
concurrent planning is completed, these elements
must be brought together  for rehearsals, espe-
cially if an unusual mission is being planned. The
following must be considered:
z Allocating the time requi red to prepare, plan,
and rehearse. Helicopte rborne planning must
be centralized and precise. It normally requires
more time than other operations.
z Additional planning time may be required for
night operations and those involving multiple
PZs and/or multiple LZs.
z The HUC must allow adequate time to ensure
that all subordinates and support elements are
thoroughly briefed. Briefing time can be signifi-
cantly reduced with SOPs and previous training.
Ground Commander’s 
View of the Plan of Attack
From the ground commander’s point of view, the
plan of attack for a helicopterborne operation
includes the scheme of maneuver, plan for sup-
porting fires, loading plan, air movement, and the
landing plan, which are developed concurrently
and are closely integrated.
Scheme of Maneuver
The scheme of maneuver is  the tactical plan exe-
cuted by a force in or der to accomplish its
assigned mission. It includes objectives, LZs,
forms of maneuver to be employed, distribution
of forces, and necessary control measures. The
commander must take into account the time
required for the helicopterb orne force to consoli-
date at the LZ and move  to its objective. The
ability to secure the LZ and move to the objective
must be compared to the enemy’s ability to rein-
force the threatened area.
Plan for Supporting Fires
The plan for supporting fires is the commander’s
employment of all supporting arms to assist in the
accomplishment of the mission. The plan for sup-
porting fire supports the scheme of maneuver and
provides for SEAD during the helicopter
approach and re tirement, preparation of the LZ,
fires in support of the consolidation of the LZ,

--- Page 32 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 4-5 
and fires in suppo rt of the ground operation. The
plan for supporting fire s should also include
plans for employment of air defense weapons.
Loading Plan
The loading plan is design ed to establish, orga-
nize, and control activities in the PZ, plan for the
movement of troops and equipment to the PZ,
and establish the priority  of loading units. For
battalions or larger, a written plan may be
required. However, the requirement for written
loading instructions  can be minimized by
advanced planning and detailed unit SOPs.
Regardless of its simplicity, the loading plan
must receive command attention during plan-
ning. The ultimate succ ess of the operation is
directly related to a pr operly developed loading
plan and subsequent control of unit loading.
Air Movement Plan
The air movement plan provides for the control
and protection of the helicopterborne force during
the air movement. The air movement plan is pri-
marily the responsibilit y of the AMC, although
the ground commander al so contributes to its
development. The air movement plan includes the
selection of approach and retirement lanes, control
points, and en route SEAD  and the provisions for
escort by attack helicopter or other aviation.
Landing Plan
The landing plan consis ts of the commander’s
guidance concerning the de sired time, place, and
sequence of arri val of units. Th e landing plan
must support the ground tactical plan.
SECTION II. DETAILED PLANNING
The HUC and AMC receive a mission from the
mission commander. If possible, the HUC and
AMC should receive the mission together in
order to begin initial coordination and to facilitate
concurrent/parallel, detailed planning. The proce-
dures for detailed planning are as follows:
z The HUC receives a mission from the mission
commander.
z The HUC and AMC pass mission information
to their staffs. They may do this in the form of
a warning order to allo w their staff and subor-
dinates to begin general planning.
z It is the mission comm ander’s responsibility to
make initial liaison with the HUC and AMC.
During his initial liaison, the mission com-
mander gives the HUC and his staff planning
data relative to the numbers and types of heli-
copters available for the lift.
During detailed planning , there are five basic
plans that comprise the reverse planning
sequence for each helicopterborne operation.
The five basic plans are the ground tactical plan,
landing plan, air moveme nt plan, loading plan,
and staging plan. Thes e plans should not be
developed independently. They are coordinated
and developed co ncurrently by the staff of the
designated helicopterborne force.
Ground Tactical Plan
The foundation for a successful helicopterborne
operation is the HUC’s ground tactical plan.
Normally, the ground tacti cal plan is developed
first and is the basis fr om which the other plans
are derived. The ground tact ical plan is a portion
of the helicopterborne scheme of maneuver. The
ground tactical plan spec ifies actions in the
objective area that ultimately accomplishes the
mission. The plan also includes subsequent oper-
ations that can include link-up operations, reposi-
tioning of the force, and sustainment. The ground
tactical plan for helic opterborne operations con-
tains essentially the same considerations as any
other infantry form of maneuver except that it

--- Page 33 ---
4-6 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
must capitalize on surp rise, speed, and mobility
in order to achieve mission success.
Mission
The most obvious portion of the helicopterborne
mission is the requirement to conduct a helicopter
movement. The followin g concerns should be
examined:
z Missions of all task fo rce elements and meth-
ods of employment.
z Purpose of the helicopter movement.
z Reason for using helicopters.
z Task organization of ground, air, and combat
support units.
z Number of Marines to be lifted.
z Total weight to be lifted.
z Internal and external loading.
z Approximate distance of the air movement.
Concept of Operations
The ground concept of ope rations is formulated
in five parts:
z Ground movement to the PZ.
z Securing and organizing the PZ (include the
task organization of th e force and embarkation
plan for force aboard mission aircraft).
z Actions at and securing of the LZ.
z Ground movement from the LZ to the objec-
tive or actions on the obj ective if the force is
landed directly on the objective.
z Operations subsequent to securing the objective.
Landing Plan
The landing plan  must support the ground tacti-
cal plan. The plan sequences troops and equip-
ment into the area of operations so that units
arrive at locations and times prepared to execute
the ground tactical plan. Appendix F provides
more information. Considerations in developing
the landing plan include—
z Availability, location, size, and enemy proxim-
ity to potential LZs are overriding factors.
z The helicopterborne forc e is most vulnerable
during landing.
z Troops and equipment mu st land with tactical
integrity.
z To avoid disorientation, troops must be
informed if changes occur in the landing direc-
tions that were given during their initial brief.
z Initially, there may be no other friendly units in
the area; therefore, th e helicopterborne force
must land prepared to fight in any direction.
z The landing plan should offer flexibility so that
a variety of options ar e available in develop-
ing a scheme of maneuver.
z Supporting fires (i.e., ar tillery, naval surface
fire support, CAS) mu st be planned in and
around each objective area LZ.
z Although the objective may be beyond the
range of supporting artillery fire, artillery or
mortars may be brought into the LZ early to
provide fire support for subsequent lifts on the
objective.
z The plan includes provisions for TRAP, imme-
diate re-embarkation,  emergency extract,
resupply, and casualty evacuation by air.
Selection of Landing Zones
LZs are selected duri ng planning between the
HUC and the AFL in coor dination with the intel-
ligence officer (S-2). The selected LZs are
approved by the MAGTF commander or mission
commander. Regardless of whether the site is a
LZ or PZ—
z The ground chosen must support the safe land-
ing of helicopters.
z The selected site shoul d be identifiable from
the air.

--- Page 34 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 4-7 
z The enemy situation must be such that the site
can be secured without undue interference from
enemy fires. 
Each helicopter requires a different size LZ/PZ,
and each area needs to  be on level ground.
Lighting conditions also affect the size of the LZ
for each helicopter: dayl ight zones should be 100
feet larger than the diam eter of aircraft rotor
blades and night zones sh ould be 150 feet larger
than the diameter of airc raft rotor blades. Table
4-1 provides the recommend landing zone diame-
ters for different types of helicopters. 
Ideally, each LZ/PZ is as level as possible, and
free of major obstacles that might obstruct land-
ings or takeoffs (e.g., tall trees, telephone/power
lines). Plans must be made to mark or identify
obstacles than cannot be removed in order to aid
the aircrew’s ability to safely land the aircraft.
The ground itself must be firm enough to prevent
bogging down, otherwise ai rcraft may have to
hover during loading or  unloading operations.
The site must be free of  heavy dust, loose snow,
logs, rocks, or dry grass.
Although level ground is preferable, some areas
that can support the helicopter will not be level.
As a planning rule, LZs with slopes greater than 7
degrees require additional consideration by the
AFL and AMC.
LZ/PZ entry and exit routes are chosen to ensure
that takeoffs or landing s can occur over the low-
est obstacles and that th e direction is into the
wind with minimum cro sswinds of 10 knots and
tailwinds of no more than 5 knots. Wind direc-
tion must also be considered in terms of its effect
on the dust created by the helicopter’s landing
and takeoff. 
The helicopter must be ab le to ascend or descend
vertically into the LZ/PZ  when fully loaded. The
landing point for each heli copter should be at a
distance 10 times as far from an obstacle as the
obstacle is high (see fig. 4-1). 
LZs are selected using the following criteria:
z Ground commander’s concept of operations.
z LZs can be located on, near, or away from the
objective, depending on the factors of METT-T.
z The size determines how much combat power
can be landed at one time. This also determines
the need for additiona l LZs or separation
between waves.
z An alternate LZ should be planned for each
primary LZ selected to ensure flexibility.
Table 4-1. Recommended 
Landing Zone Diameters.
Type 
Aircraft
Rotor Blade
Diameter (feet)
Landing Zone Diameter
Daylight (+100)/Night (+150)
UH-1 50 150/200
CH-46 85 185/235
CH-53 100 200/250
30 Ft
300 Ft
Figure 4-1. LZ Obstacle Clearance.

--- Page 35 ---
4-8 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
z Enemy troop concentra tion and air defenses
and their capability to re act to a nearby heli-
copterborne landing are considered when
selecting LZs.
z LZs deny enemy observa tion and acquisition
of friendly ground and air elements while they
are en route to, in, and departing from the LZ.
z If possible, the helicopterborne force should
land on the enemy side of obstacles when
attacking and use obstacles to protect LZs from
the enemy at the other times.
z LZs must be free of obstacles.
z LZs should be readily iden tifiable from the air.
When possible, reconnaissance units should be
used to reconnoiter and mark the LZ.
z Requirements for logistic support.
z Requirements for fire support.
z Available lanes to and from LZs and any
restrictive effects on the employment of sup-
porting arms.
z Reduced visibility or strong winds may pre-
clude or limit the use of marginal LZs.
Single Versus Multiple Landing Zones
In addition to deciding wh ere to land in relation
to the objective, planners must address whether to
use single or multiple LZs . The advantages of a
single LZ are as follows:
z Allows concentration of  combat power in one
location (if the LZ is large enough).
z Facilitates control of the operation.
z Concentrates supporti ng arms in and around
the LZ. Firepower is diffused if more than one
LZ preparation is required.
z Provides better security during subsequent lifts.
z Requires fewer attack helicopters for security.
z Reduces the number of fl ight routes in the
objective area, making it more difficult for
enemy intelligence sour ces to detect helicop-
terborne operations.
z Centralizes any required resupply operations.
z Concentrates efforts of limited LZ control per-
sonnel and engineers on one LZ.
z Requires less planning and rehearsal time.
The advantages of multiple LZs are as follows:
z Avoids grouping assets in one location and cre-
ates a lucrative target for enemy mortars, artil-
lery, and CAS.
z Allows rapid dispersa l of ground elements to
accomplish tasks in separate areas.
z Reduces the enemy’s ability to detect and react
to the initial lift.
z Forces the enemy to fight in more than one
direction.
z Reduces the possibility of troop congestion in
one LZ.
z Eliminates aircraft congestion in one LZ.
z Makes it difficult for the enemy to determine
the size of the helic opterborne force and the
exact location of supporting weapons.
Landing Formations
Aircraft formations on th e LZ should facilitate
operational offloading and deployment. The num-
ber and type of aircraft and the configuration and
size of the LZ may dict ate the landing formation
during the planning pro cess. Because contact is
expected in the LZ, troo ps are landed ready to
employ fire and movement. In order to reduce
troop exposure, an LZ formation will not main-
tain standard distances between aircraft and must
land rapidly in a safe area as close to concealment
as possible. 
Supporting Fires
Typically, the initial assa ult is made without pre-
paratory fires in order to achieve tactical sur-
prise. However, preparat ory fires are planned for
each LZ so they can be fired if needed. Planned

--- Page 36 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 4-9 
fires for helicopterborn e operations should be
intense and short, but wi th a high volume of fire
to maximize surprise and shock. Supporting fires
end just before the first assault element’s land-
ing. Fire support plans developed to support the
landing plan must address the following:
z False preparations fire d into areas other than
the objective or LZ.
z Loss of surprise due to lengthy preparations.
z Time, location, speed, and size of committed
forces that affect the ability to achieve surprise. 
z Based on the allocation of  fire support and the
commander’s guidance, the fire support coor-
dinator (FSC) conducts fire support planning to
support the landing. Hi gher echelons allocate
supporting arms to lo wer echelons. Command-
ers at lower echelons may then further allocate
fire support (e.g., priority of fires).
z Significant targets and either the known or sus-
pected enemy, regardless of size, warrants tar-
get planning.
z Obstacles to landing a nd maneuver; for exam-
ple, some ordnance used to prepare the site can
cause craters, tree blowdown, fires, and LZ
obscuration and therefore may not be desirable.
z Fires are scheduled to be  lifted or shifted to
coincide with the arrival times of aircraft for-
mations.
z Positive control measures  must be established
for lifting or shifting fi res. Airspace coordina-
tion areas may be necessary to protect approach
and retirement lanes.
z Use of escorts as CAS for the GCE in the LZ
must be coordinated pr ior to mission launch.
The HUC should not assu me that escort air-
craft will be available if  their use has not been
coordinated with the AMC.
z If a FAC(A) is availabl e, consideration should
be given to the FAC(A) controlling fires during
insertion of the initial wave(s) until the GCE
can assume control of fires.
Emergency Extract
If the enemy force has overwhelming combat
power, the supported unit must plan for an emer-
gency extract. The sup ported unit must address
what the helicopterborne  force expects the ACE
to provide. Support may involve a surge of CAS,
the maneuver of another reinforcing unit into a
nearby LZ, or it may be  emergency extraction.
Units must understand, ho wever, that an emer-
gency extract may not alwa ys be possible. If the
unit has suffered casual ties or the enemy force
possesses greater mobility,  an attempt to execute
an emergency extract may be disastrous.
The HUC may be delegate d the authority by the
mission commander to call for an emergency
extract if an enemy force threatens to destroy the
unit. Therefore, the HUC must clearly understand
how the helicopterborne mission fits into the
MAGTF scheme of maneuve r. The repercussions
of executing an emergency extract on the MAGTF
scheme of maneuver must  weigh heavily on the
decision to execute. 
Once the decision has be en made to execute an
emergency extract, escort and/or combat air
patrol aircraft move into  position to provide sup-
pressive fires. The he licopterborne unit breaks
contact and moves to a s ecure PZ. On call, the
assault support aircraft ex tracts the unit. Consid-
eration should be given to  landing all aircraft in
one wave—zone, threat, a nd aircraft availability
permitting—in order to expedite the extract.
Since confusion is  inherent during an emergency
extract, all part icipants must thoroughly under-
stand weapons conditions in order to reduce/elim-
inate the risk of fratri cide. A visual means to
distinguish between friend and foe must be estab-
lished and briefed to the assault support gunners.

--- Page 37 ---
4-10 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
Air Movement Plan
The air movement plan is based on the ground
tactical plan and the la nding plan. Th e air move-
ment plan specifies the air movement schedule
and provides instructions for the air movement of
troops, equipment, and supplies from PZs to LZs.
It also provides coordina ting instructions pertain-
ing to approach and retirement routes, air control
points, aircraft speeds, altitude, and formations.
The planned use of attack  helicopters, to include
security and linkup locatio ns, should be included
in the plan. During MAGTF operations, the
MAGTF commander appr oves the air movement
plan based on the recommendations of the AMC,
HUC, and the CSS unit commander. The infor-
mation essential to the ground combat com-
mander is obtained and disseminated by the
ground unit air officer.
  WARNING  WARNING
In order to prevent fratricide, it is imperative
that the fire support plan for the entire heli-
copterborne operation be thoroughly coordi-
nated between the mission commander, HUC,
and AMC. The AMC has primary responsibility
for planning/coordinating fires in support of
the air movement plan. The HUC has primary
responsibility for planning/coordinating fires
for the remainder of the helicopterborne oper-
ation. Fires in support of the landing plan
must be particularly well coordinated between
the HUC and AMC. If an  EFL is assigned, he
will be the lead ACE fire support planner dur-
ing the development of the fire support plan
for the entire helicopterborne operation.
Selection of Helicopter 
Approach and Retirement Routes
Helicopter approach and re tirement routes are air
corridors in which helicopters fly to and from
their destination during  helicopter operations.
During MAGTF operations, the MAGTF com-
mander, based on the recommendations of the
AMC and the HUC, selects helicopter approach
and retirement routes. Examination of METT-T
with strong emphasis on threat analysis deter-
mines approach and retirement route selection.
Route and altitude are interdependent in the
selection and are consid ered concurrently to
determine the optimum movement. Avoidance of
enemy detection and fires is the primary consid-
eration. In addition to METT-T factors, route
selection planning considers the following gen-
eral principles:
z Has the terrain been used to the best tactical
advantage?
z Have the primary and al ternate approach and
retirement routes been identified?
z Have routes been selected that are easy to iden-
tify and navigate?
z Will communications capabilities be impaired?
z Can the routes be used  under adverse weather
conditions?
z Do unique support require ments exist for the
routes selected?
z Have supporting arms capa bilities and limita-
tions been considered?
Ground Considerations 
During Helicopter Movement
Ground commanders must  know the dimensions
of helicopter approach a nd retirement routes for
fire support planning, and they must be familiar
with where routes begi n and end. Because heli-
copters may be forced to land along the route,
commanders should be able to identify promi-
nent terrain features and checkpoints during flight
in order to facilitate  mission accomplishment.
Therefore, ground comm anders should conduct
visual reconnaissance to the maximum extent
possible during flight and, as helicopters pass
over checkpoints, inform  Marines so they can
prepare to disembark.

--- Page 38 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________ 4-11 
Supporting Fires Along 
the Approach and Retirement Route
The following must be co nsidered during plan-
ning of supporting fires fo r helicopter approach
and retirement routes:
z Fires along the flight r oute are planned to sup-
press known or suspected enemy positions.
These fires should be of short duration. Multi-
ple target engagement  techniques are used
(e.g., groups, series).
z Fire plans cover the PZ s, flight routes, and
LZs. Fire support plan s include SEAD sys-
tems and smoke to pr otect formations from
enemy detection. This requires aggressive fire
planning by the FSC and direct coordination
with supporting units.
z All available fire suppor t is used to suppress
and/or destroy enemy weapons.
z Support may consist of smoke or other elec-
tronic attack for suppressing or confusing
enemy air defense system s.   However, smoke
can become an obscur ant that can interfere
with the flight phase of the operation.
z On-call fires are planne d along the flight route
to ensure the rapid ad justment of targets of
opportunity.
z During night operations, the use of illumination
fire requires detailed planning because illumi-
nation can interfere with NVDs and cause
unsafe conditions.
Loading Plan
Mobility is accomplished only to the extent that
the ground unit retains its ability to accomplish
its primary mission while  moving. If the helicop-
terborne unit must re-organize or adjust upon
landing, the mobility, momentum, tempo, and ini-
tiative are lost or diminished. The only way to
maintain the required degree of mobility during a
helicopterborne operation is to load and land heli-
copters in the manner an d sequence that allows
immediate assumption of the mission upon land-
ing. Therefore, an effective and efficient loading
plan is critical to the su ccess of a helicopterborne
operation. Appendix H provides helicopter char-
acteristics that will assist in load planning.
The loading plan is based on the air movement
plan. It ensures that Marines, equipment, and sup-
plies are loaded on the co rrect aircraft. Helicop-
ter loads are also priori tized to establish a bump
plan. A bump plan ensures that essential Marines
and equipment are loaded  ahead of less critical
loads in case of aircraft breakdown or other prob-
lems. In any case, planning must cover the orga-
nization and operation of the PZ including load
positions, day and night markings, and communi-
cations. The loading plan is more critical when
mixing internal and exte rnal loads and/or when
mixing helicopter types.
Primary and Alternate Pickup Zones
Identification of primary and alternate PZs is the
first step in developing  the loading plan. The
establishment of adequate unit SOPs covering PZ
operations and loading plans reduces the require-
ment for detailed, written plans. PZs must accom-
modate helicopter landing and lift, be securable
with ground forces, and facilitate staging of air-
craft loads. Although enemy contact or influence
is not desired during pi ckup, pickup under pres-
sure must be considered and addressed during
planning. Ideal PZs also facilitate delivery of sup-
pressive fires, security  for ground troops, and
security for landed and lifting helicopters.
Pickup Zone Criteria
PZ criteria for selection and organization are sim-
ilar to those required fo r an LZ. However, addi-
tional PZ criteria are as follows:
z Number: multiple PZs avoid concentrating
forces in one area.
z Size: each PZ accommodates all supporting
aircraft at once, if possible.
z Proximity to troops: if possible, PZs should not
require ground movement to the PZ by troops.

--- Page 39 ---
4-12 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
z Accessibility: if possible, PZs should be acces-
sible by vehicles to move support assets and
infantry.
z Vulnerability to attack: selected PZs should be
masked by terrain from enemy observation to
the maximum extent possible.
z Preparation: if possible, PZs are usable as-is
rather than requiring clearing
Once PZs are identified , the ground commander
selects and assigns PZs to be used by subordi-
nate units.   
Pickup Zone Control
PZs are organized to meet specific mission
requirements. Depending on the size and magni-
tude of the operation, a PZ may be as small as one
point in one site or it may include numerous sites.
A multiple site PZ may require select sites to
conduct strictly internal or  external loading func-
tions. Specializing site s for specific functions
(e.g., heavy lift, exte rnal operations, combat
assault transport) may f acilitate operations when
employing a PZ that contains numerous sites
within its confines. For example, a battalion-sized
helicopterborne assault could require a four-site
zone: one site may conduct cargo external lift
functions, another site external vehicle lifts,
another internal cargo loading, an d another tacti-
cal loading of troops. This enables equipment and
personnel to be concentrated where most needed.
Pickup Zone Control Officer
The PZCO organizes, cont rols, and coordinates
operations in the PZ. Th e PZCO is designated by
and responsible to the co mmanding officer of the
moving unit. In battali on-level operations, the
PZCO could be the battalion executive officer. In
most situations, the air officer will not function as
the PZCO. He will usually be in the combat oper-
ations center assisting the FSC in the allocation
of air power. Marines from the service platoon,
headquarters and servic e company, form the PZ
control group and are trained by the battalion air
officer. All personnel al located to PZ control
must be completely trai ned in HST functions to
include external lifting te rminal control. The air
officer uses HST Marine s from the landing sup-
port battalion to augmen t the training program.
The PZCO accomplishes the following:
z Forms a control group to conduct operations
and to provide assistance. The control group
may include—
„ Terminal control.
„ Guides to lead elemen ts from unit positions
around the zone to the staging area.
„ Marines to conduct hookup operations for
external lifts.
„ Marines to clear PZs and to provide local se-
curity.
„ Other Marines as needed to perform required
tasks within the zone.   
Note
For battalion helicopterborne operations, 
each company commander may need to 
appoint a PZCO to operate a company PZ 
for the battalion.
z Establishes communica tions on two primary
radio frequencies: one  to control movement
and loading of units and one to control aviation
elements. Alternate frequencies are provided as
necessary.
z Plans and initiates fire support near PZs to pro-
vide all-round protecti on (from available sup-
port) without endangering arrival and departure
of troops or aircraft. The fire support plan must
be closely coordinated with the HUC and AMC.
z Plans and initiates adequa te security to protect
the main body as it assembles, moves to the
PZ, and is lifted out. If  the PZ is within the
friendly area, other forces, if available, provide
the security elements. Security comes from the
helicopterborne force’s resources if the force is
to be extracted from the objective area.
z Clears the PZ of obstacles.
z Marks the PZ.

--- Page 40 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________ 4-13 
PZ Identification and Marking
Identification and marking occurs as follows:
z The PZCO directs the markings of PZs, sites,
and points.
z PZs are designated by a code name.
z A zone with more than one site is usually iden-
tifiable in the air by prominent terrain features.
z A zone can be marked by several methods
(e.g., colored smoke, air panels). Red is never
used to mark an aircraft landing position. Red
is used to mark landing obstacles (e.g., trees,
stumps) in the landing area.
z Landing sites are designated by a color.
z Landing points are desi gnated by two-digit
numbers.
z Regardless of the type of markers, the PZ is
marked to indicate wher e aircraft are to land
and to coincide with th e selected PZ aircraft
formation.
z An effective method is to have several individ-
uals in each unit paint (and carry) an extra cam-
ouflage cover or a modifi ed (cut to size) air
panel. The colored cover, when displayed, indi-
cates where the lead aircraft lands.
Movement to the PZ
Ground and air unit move ment to the PZ is
scheduled so that only the troops and the helicop-
ter to be loaded arrive at  the PZ at the same time.
This prevents congestio n, preserves security, and
reduces vulnerability to enemy actions on the PZ.
To coordinate the movement of units to the PZ,
the PZCO—
z Selects troop assembly areas, holding areas,
and routes of moveme nt. A holding area is
located close to the PZ. It is used only when
the assembly is some distance away and does
not allow timely movement to the PZ.
z Determines the movement time of ground units
to PZs.
z Specifies arrival time(s) and sees that move-
ment of units remains on schedule.
Helicopter Wave and Serial Assignment Table
At company and lower levels, the helicopter
wave and serial assi gnment table (HWSAT)
assigns each Marine a nd major items of equip-
ment or supplies to a specific aircraft. The
HWSAT is a simple account ability tool that pro-
vides a loading manifest for each aircraft.   If
time is limited, the HWSA T can be a simple list
of each Marine (by na me) and the equipment to
be loaded on each aircraft and given to a speci-
fied representative. Either method of accountabil-
ity ensures that if an airc raft is lost, a list of on
board personnel and/or equipment is available.
Note
If recurring, small-unit helicopterborne 
operations are anticipated, small-unit lead-
ers may require their Marines to carry indi-
vidual, preprinted 3- by 5-inch cards for 
quick collection upon loading.   
One of the critical datum calculated during
HWSAT preparation is th e gross weight (person-
nel and equipment) to be  loaded on the aircraft.
The pilot in command of each aircraft must be
provided with the gross we ight of each load to
ensure that aircraft weight limitations are not
exceeded and that the ai rcraft can safely accom-
plish its assigned mission with the proposed load
(given the ambient environmental conditions).
Load Planning
During preparation of the loading tables, all unit
leaders attempt to maintain the following:
z Fire teams and squads ar e loaded intact on the
same aircraft and platoons in the same wave in
order to maintain the t actical integrity of each
unit. 
z The composite first wave  is an exception to
maintaining tactical integrity of units. The
composite first wave facilitates the seizure of
the objective LZ and th e landing of subse-
quent waves into the LZ  area. Establishing a
composite first wave enables the commander

--- Page 41 ---
4-14 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
to task-organize the init ial landing with vary-
ing elements from subord inate units of the tac-
tical force. This option  may facilitate securing
the objective LZ by el iminating the need to
move troops on the ground as subsequent
waves land.   
z Each unit load should be  functionally self-suf-
ficient whenever possible.
z Every towed item is accompanied by its prime
mover.
z Crews are loaded with their vehicle(s) or
weapon(s).
z Component parts are loaded with major items
of equipment.
z Ammunition is carried with the weapon.
z Sufficient personnel are on board to unload
cargo.
z Communications between flights is established.
z Tactical spread loading is applied to all loads
so that all leaders, or  all crew-served weapons,
are not loaded on the sa me aircraft. Thus, if an
aircraft is lost, the mission is not seriously ham-
pered. For example, loading the platoon com-
mander, platoon sergeant, and all squad leaders
on the same helicopter  or loading more than
one machine gun team on the same aircraft are
violations of cross-loading principles.
Another consideration is to determine whether
internal or external loading is the best delivery
method for equipment and supplies. Helicopters
loaded internally can fly faster and are more
maneuverable. Externally (sling) loaded helicop-
ters fly slower and are less maneuverable; how-
ever, they can be load ed and unloaded more
rapidly than internally loaded helicopters. Exter-
nally loaded supplies can also present problems if
supplies are destined for more than one location
or unit. The loading method used depends largely
on availability of sling and rigging equipment.
Aircraft Bump Plan
AMCs must inform the PZCO about any changes
to the number, type, and carrying capability of the
aircraft en route to th e PZ. The PZCO must have
time to re-organize sticks  and institute the bump
plan before the arrival of  the assault support air-
craft. Each aircraft load has a bump sequence des-
ignated on its helicopter  employment and assault
landing table (HEALT). Bump priority ensures
that the most essential personnel and equipment
arrive at the objective area first.   
Note
A load (stick) is the smallest group of per-
sonnel and/or equipment that will be moved 
by a single aircraft and will not be broken 
into smaller units.   More than one stick may 
be moved by a single aircraft (i.e., 2 sticks of 
12 may embark one CH-53E).
The bump plan specifies personnel and equip-
ment that may be bumped  and delivered later. If
all personnel within the load cannot be lifted,
individuals must know who is to offload and in
what sequence. This ensures that key personnel
are not bumped arbitrarily. Also, a bump
sequence is designated for aircraft within each
serial or flight. This ensures that key aircraft
loads are not left in the PZ. When an aircraft
within a serial or flight cannot lift off and key
personnel are on board, th ey offload and reboard
another aircraft that has priority.
Company or larger units specify a PZ bump-and-
straggler collection point. Personnel not moved
as planned report to this  location, are accounted
for, regrouped, and resc heduled by the PZCO for
later delivery to appropriate LZs.
The mission to be accomplished by each subordi-
nate unit upon landing determines the sequence
of departure from each PZ. Unit priorities are
based on the sequence of  arrival at their LZs.
For example, if company A is to land first (at L-
hour), and company B se cond (at L+15), and
company B is 15 minutes fa rther (in flight time)
from the objective LZ; it may depart the PZ
before company A.

--- Page 42 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________ 4-15 
Staging Plan
The staging plan is based on the loading plan and
prescribes the arriva l time of ground units
(troops, equipment, and supplies) at the PZ and
their proper order for movement. Loads must be
ready before aircraft ar rive at the PZ; usually,
ground units are expected to be in the PZ 15 min-
utes before aircraft arrival. 
The staging plan also restates the PZ organiza-
tion, defines flight routes  to the PZ, and provides
instructions for linkup of all aviation assets. Air-
to-air linkup of aviation  units should be avoided,
especially at night when NVDs are being used.
SECTION III. MISSION BRIEFING AND DEBRIEFING
The responsibility  for operational briefings is a
function of command and rests with the com-
mander tasked with executing the helicopterborne
operation. Generally, each subordinate level of
command conducts a briefing that focuses on that
unit’s participation in the operation. For exam-
ple, a command represen tative of the landing
force/MAGTF briefs the ove rall operation, repre-
sentatives from the helicopter and helicopter-
borne units brief their unit’s participation, the
AMC briefs the airborne portion of the helicop-
terborne assault, each i ndividual flight leader
briefs his flight, and each individual aircraft com-
mander briefs his aircrew.
Mission Brief
The mission brief is the final phase of the plan-
ning effort and should be  attended by all key per-
sonnel. This brief sets  forth the concept of
operations, scheme of maneuver, and specific
details concerning mission coordination and exe-
cution. Information is pr ovided that enables each
participant to understa nd the overall operation
and his specific role and responsibilities regarding
mission execution. Joint br iefings with represen-
tatives from each participating unit should be
used as much as possibl e. Depending on the mis-
sion requirements, the minimum attendees should
include the AMC, HUC, FS C or his representa-
tive, TAC(A) or FAC(A), FAC, fixed-wing attack
aircraft flight leader, attack helicopter flight
leader/flight coordinator,  AFL, and the aircraft
commanders. The inform ation developed during
the planning effort becomes the subject matter for
the mission brief.
Helicopterborne Mission Briefing Guide
Proper briefing of flight crews is essential to mis-
sion success.   The helicopterborne mission brief-
ing should be conducted in the most logical,
brief, and organized mann er possible. The infor-
mation from appendix F a nd the helicopter tacti-
cal manual series of publications (Naval Warfare
Publication [NWP] 3-22.5) provides detailed mis-
sion briefing guides. Th e following information
is presented at the helicopter mission briefing:
z Helicopter assignment.
z Call signs.
z Flight leader/alternate flight leader.
z Execution timeline.
z Controlling agencies.
z Frequencies.
z Radio procedures.
z Identification, friend or foe procedures/codes.
z Navigation data.
z HEALT and HWSAT.
z Execution checklist.
z LZ/PZ diagrams (include imagery if available).
It must be emphasized that the mission briefing
guide is only that, a gui de, and is not intended to
be used in total, or depicted sequence, for every
type of the mission. On ly those items directly

--- Page 43 ---
4-16 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
applicable to a specific mission should be incorpo-
rated into the mission brie f. Since all members of
the mission will not be involved in the planning, it
is imperative that the flight brief be well delivered,
organized, and easily un derstood. The use of the
mission briefing guide, ade quate rehearsals, and
the use of tactical SOPs significantly reduce the
time required to conduct the brief.

--- Page 44 ---
CHAPTER 5
COMBAT OPERATIONS
Helicopterborne operati ons are deliberate, pre-
cisely planned, and vigorously executed combat
operations. Helicopterborne operations are
designed to allow friendly forces to strike over
extended distances and terrain barriers in order to
attack the enemy when and where he is most vul-
nerable. It is the MA GTF commander’s option to
employ a helicopterborne operation to enhance a
ground operation.  The decision to conduct a heli-
copterborne operation depends on many factors
relative to METT-T. The commander uses the
HTF when the situation permits and when the
possible payoff outweighs the risk.  A helicopter-
borne capability promotes  speed, surprise, and
flexibility so that the commander can react rap-
idly to a changing situation.
A helicopterborne operat ion can be conducted
alone or in conjunction with another operation. A
helicopterborne operation is based on the ground
tactical plan, and it capitalizes on speed and flexi-
bility in order to gain maximum surprise. The
ultimate goal of a helico pterborne operation is to
place the assault echelon on or near the objective
capable of immediate action. Typically, helicop-
terborne operations are conducted–
z In offensive operations to– 
„ Seize key terrain.
„ Overcome obstacles.
„ Conduct raids.
z Insert or extract patrols–
„ Conduct security operations.
„ Support deception operations.
„ Reposition forces.
z Rapidly reinforce a successful attack. 
z In defensive operations to–
„ Block enemy penetrations or withdrawals.
„ Reinforce encircled forces.
z Insert or extract patrols–
„ Conduct security operations. 
„ Conduct counterattacks.
„ Reposition forces.
SECTION I. HELICOPTERBORNE 
OPERATIONS IN OFFENSIVE OPERATIONS
The helicopterborne attack  is the basic type of
offensive operation conducted by the helicopter-
borne task force. It is the integration of combat,
combat support, and CS S elements into and out
of an objective area. Ge nerally, the term inser-
tion applies when discus sing the movement of an
assault into the objective area a nd the extraction
applies when discussing the movement from the
objective area.  These terms are fundamental to
all helicopterborne operations.
Attack
The opportunity to attack  may arise during the
course of battle or it may be cr eated by skillful,

--- Page 45 ---
5-2 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
tactical leadership. Whatever the source, the
attack should be fast, violent, and coordinated.
The helicopterborne force may conduct an attack
in conjunction with other forces. The type of
action conducted by the larger force usually dic-
tates the type of attack  employed by the helicop-
terborne force.
There are two types of at tacks that a helicopter-
borne operation may be involved in: hasty and
deliberate. The hasty attack  is one in which prep-
aration time is traded for speed in order to exploit
an opportunity. A deliberate attack is character-
ized by preplanned, co ordinated employment of
firepower and maneuver . The major difference
between a hasty and deliberate attack is the time
and enemy information available.
Hasty Attack
Because the hasty attack  is conducted on short
notice, there is little time  to plan and orders must
be brief. The helicopterborne force must then rely
on previous training and SOPs to cover these sit-
uations. The following may require a helicopter-
borne force to execute a hasty attack in support of
a larger force:
z Unexpected contact is made during the move-
ment to contact by the larger force (the heli-
copterborne force can be used to exploit a
tactical advantage or fu rther develop the tacti-
cal situation).
z When part of the larger force’s deliberate attack
plan is modified while the operation is under-
way (the helicopterborne force can reinforce a
weakened area or exploit a tactical advantage).
z An exploitation and/or pur suit (the helicopter-
borne force is committed to exploit the attack’s
success and maintain momentum).
z A counterattack.
When a hasty attack is considered under any of
the circumstances listed above, it is important to
identify tentative PZs, LZs, and approach and
retirement lanes throughout the higher unit’s zone
of action. Continuously identifying these areas
permits rapid commitment of the helicopterborne
force anywhere in the sector.
When the helicopterborne force is committed, the
commander initiates several actions simulta-
neously. The commander directs suppressive fires
to neutralize the enemy’ s ability to counter the
helicopterborne operation and concentrates suffi-
cient combat power to overwhelm the enemy at
selected points. While th e helicopterborne force
is en route, supporting fi res suppress or destroy
known or suspected enemy positions. Priority of
fires go to SEAD.
When the attack starts , attack helicopters over-
watch and react as nece ssary while the FSC and
air officer direct  artillery, mortars, CAS, and
other supporting fires. Artillery and mortars
destroy, neutralize, or suppress enemy indirect
fire weapons as soon as they are located. Smoke
may be used to screen aircraft movement from
observation. However, the commander is careful
that smoke does not obscure the LZ and hinder
the landing operation. Airspace coordination
must be effected early.
Deliberate Attack
The helicopterborne force,  as part of a larger
force operation, may conduct a deli berate attack.
The helicopterborne force is provided sufficient
time to develop a detaile d, coordinated plan;
receive additional assets; change task organiza-
tion as necessary; and gather detailed intelli-
gence. Detailed informa tion about the terrain is
collected so that the be st PZs, LZs, and flight
routes can be selected. During a deliberate attack,
helicopterborne objective s are normally in the
enemy’s rear area or the attack is from the flank
or rear.
When the larger force concentrates its combat
power on a narrow front to break through the
enemy defense, the helic opterborne force may
bypass main defenses to destroy artillery posi-
tions, command posts, logistic and communica-
tions facilities, and/or to secure key terrain in the
enemy’s rear.

--- Page 46 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 5-3 
An attack against a h eavier or well-prepared
enemy force, particularly on the mechanized and/
or armor battlefield, may subject the helicopter-
borne force to devastating firepower. For this rea-
son, the helicopterborne  force may land away
from the objective and c onduct an infantry attack
in conjunction with frie ndly mechanized and/or
armor forces. The heli copterborne force must
also consider that a hi ghly mobile enemy force
could encircle the force before it moves from an
LZ. Consequently, the commander selects LZs in
terrain that is favorable to infantry operations and
employs antitank weapon s and attack helicopters
on likely armor avenues of approach.  With accu-
rate intelligence, these actions provide time to
organize after landing and to attack the objective.
Exploitation
Exploitation is another operation where the heli-
copterborne operations can be used for a low-
risk, high-payoff operation. Exploitation is an
operation undertak en to follow up success in the
attack. Attacks are conducted with two overriding
requirements: speed and violence. The attackers
bypass pockets of resistance to concentrate on the
destruction of the more vulnerable headquarters,
combat support, and CSS units. They disrupt the
enemy’s command and contro l; his flow of fuel,
ammunition, and repair parts; and his air defenses
and artillery. Disrupting the enemy’s flow of sup-
port weakens and/or destroys the enemy. Enemy
air defenses are avoide d or suppressed so the
helicopterborne force can exploit the situation.
Pursuit
Pursuit is an offensive operation designed to catch
or cut off a hostile forc e that is attempting to
escape, with the intent of destroying it. Its pur-
pose is to envelop the retreating force and destroy
it by coordinated fire and maneuver. A helicopter-
borne force, operating as part of the pursuit force,
can expect to be ordered to bypass resistance of
any kind and move rele ntlessly to deep objec-
tives that serve as chokepoints for the retreating
enemy. The helicopter pr ovides the task force
with the high degree of mobility required to con-
duct pursuit operations.
Fixed-wing aircraft, attack helicopters, and the
helicopterborne force can repeatedly attack the
flanks of the withdrawing enemy columns, slow-
ing them and aiding in their destruction. Blocking
positions can be established on withdrawal routes
to trap enemy forces between the encircling force
and the direct pressure  force. Artillery and
FARPs should be lifted in to the encircling force
areas as soon as possible.
Secure and Defend
Seizure and Retention
A helicopterborne assau lt operation conducted
during a seizure and retention operation is two-
phased and requires deta iled planning like a
deliberate attack. The secure and defend mission
is conducted when an obj ective, such as a vital
terrain feature, must be seized and retained. The
limited staying power of the helicopterborne
force dictates early link up with ground units,
reinforcement by other units, or extraction from
the enemy area.
First Phase
The first phase is an attack to secure terrain to be
controlled by the helicopt erborne force in the ini-
tial stages of the assault.  This should be a single
lift insertion of sufficie nt combat power to defeat
enemy forces at the objective.
Second Phase
The second phase of the operation is defense of
the objective LZ. This normally involves a perim-
eter defense that controls  all terrain essential to
the defense of the LZ. This  area should be large
enough to provide operating space for combat,
combat support, and CSS units. It may require

--- Page 47 ---
5-4 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
adequate PZs for simultaneous helicopterborne
operations and space for landing artillery, follow-
on forces, and supplies. The area must be small
enough for the helicopterborne unit to defend, yet
large enough to permit defense-in-depth and
maneuver of Reserves to  counter enemy attacks.
Size is dictated by mission, enemy strength,
enemy disposition, terra in, and helicopterborne
combat power.
Control Measures
Boundaries delineate resp onsibilities of the heli-
copterborne forc e’s subordinate elements. A bat-
talion area may be divi ded into company-sized
zones and objectives. Each company clears,
secures, and defends an assigned area. The size
sector assigned each company should be within its
capabilities to seize a nd defend. For example, a
company facing a dangerous  avenue of approach
is assigned a smaller sector than a company facing
a less dangerous avenue. Defensive responsibili-
ties for an avenue of approach are not divided.
The unit assigned the appr oach also covers any
dominating terrain.
Assault Objectives
If a terrain feature is vita l to mission accomplish-
ment and is to be secure d during an assault, it is
designated as an assau lt objective. The assault
objective should include terrain that dominates all
high-speed approaches  to the objective area.
Assault objectives are as signed priori ties. Those
specified by higher headqu arters are given first
priority. Others are ranked according to the threat
they would pose if cont rolled by the enemy. A
company’s sector should include at least one LZ
for an assault landing, resupply, and evacuation.
Reconnaissance in Force
Reconnaissance in force is an offensive opera-
tion designed to discover and/or test the enemy’s
strength or to obtain other information. Typically,
it is conducted when the enemy situation is
vague. The information (e.g., major weaknesses
in enemy positions) obtai ned from the operation,
if promptly exploited, may provide a significant
tactical advantage. The reconnaissance in force is
planned and conducted with units specifically
prepared to find the enemy and to develop the sit-
uation. The reconnaissan ce in force accepts risk
in order to gain intellig ence information rapidly
and in more detail th an other reconnaissance
methods. The MAGTF commander assigning a
helicopterborne force a reconnaissance in force
mission must determine the following:
z Is the desired inform ation important enough to
justify the risks to personnel and possible loss
of aircraft?
z Can other intelligence methods obtain the same
information in sufficient time with less risk?
z Will a reconnaissance in force compromise
future plans?
z Can the operation succeed?
A reconnaissance in forc e operation also locates
the enemy and presses him into reacting. When a
weak point is discovered, the helicopterborne
force exploits it quick ly. The commander exer-
cises caution, however, since the enemy response
may be too strong for th e helicopterborne force.
Thus, the commander also plans a withdrawal to
avoid destruction.
However, a helicopterbor ne operation is not
designed to land where the enemy is located.
Therefore, the helicopterborne operation, in many
cases, will be a reconnaissance in force. 
The reconnaissance in fo rce is an ideal mission
for the helicopterborne force in an insurgent envi-
ronment to keep constant pressure on a guerrilla
force. Helicopterborne fo rces are also suited for
reconnaissance in force operations against con-
ventional light infantry . Helicopterborne forces
are not suited for operati ons against strong armor
threats due to the likelihood of ground contact
with an enemy force that  has superior firepower,
mobility, and protection.

--- Page 48 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 5-5 
If the commander needs in formation about a par-
ticular area, a reconnaissa nce in force is planned
and executed as an attack against a specific objec-
tive(s). The objective of the attack is usually of
such importance that when threatened, the enemy
will react. The helicopterborne force’s combat
power must be sufficient to force the enemy to
react and reveal his pos ition, strength, planned
fires, and planned use of Reserves. It may also
disrupt the enemy’s planned operations and take
the initiative from him. When a reconnaissance in
force is used to achieve a specific objective, the
helicopterborne battalion can deploy all its com-
panies or the commander may commit one or two
companies and retain th e remaining elements to
respond to tactic al situations as  they develop.
When the enemy reacts to  one unit, the units not
in contact are shifted to  exploit revealed enemy
weaknesses or help extract a unit under pressure.
Raid
Helicopterborne forces are well-suited for raids;
however, detailed planning and the elements of
surprise are vital to th e success of a helicopter-
borne raid. A helicopterborne raid is a swift pene-
tration of hostile territo ry that may be conducted
to destroy installation s, confuse the enemy, or
gather information, and it ends with a planned
withdrawal. Because a ra id is conducted behind
enemy lines, it requires exact planning to ensure
a high probability of su ccess. The selection of
LZs, PZs, and flight rout es (as in the deliberate
attack) is based on the results of detailed planning
and required intelligence . Since the raiding force
attempts to achieve surp rise, the decision to land
on the objective takes on added significance
SECTION II. HELICOPTERBORNE
OPERATIONS IN DEFENSIVE OPERATIONS
Defense is a coordinated effort to deny the enemy
his purpose in attack ing. Types of defense
include mobile and pos ition. A mobile defense
destroys the attacking enemy by offensive action.
A position defense focuses on the retention of ter-
rain. Based on the specif ic tactical mission, the
commander uses METT-T an alysis to determine
the best type of defensive operation.
The helicopterborne forc e can defend against an
infantry-heavy threat by employing its mobility
to achieve a maneuver advantage over the enemy.
This advantage can allo w the force to perform
operations in the security  area, main battle area,
and rear area.
The helicopterborne force may be able to conduct
security force operations for a larger force. Nor-
mally, security area opera tions consist of air
reconnaissance, in fantry, artiller y, engineer, and
attack helicopter operations to position combat
power and combat support quickly and in the most
advantageous locations during rapidly changing
situation. Infantry and artillery assigned to security
force operations must be provided a security area
that is organized based on the following:
z Number of enemy avenues of approach into the
security area.
z Size and type of enemy forces. 
Security area forces acco mplish their mission by
placing the majority of th eir combat units on the
most dangerous avenues of approach into the
security area.  Air reconnaissance deploys to the
front and provides early warning of the direction,
speed, and composition of  enemy forces. Enemy
units are placed under fire  as soon as they are
within weapon range. As the enemy attempts to
close with ground units of the security force,
attack helicopters, artillery, and CAS provide fire-
power that enable ground units to displace by air
to successive positions. Protection of helicopter-
borne infantry and antitank systems is achieved

--- Page 49 ---
5-6 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
by superior mobility. Security area units wear the
enemy down, deceive him as to the location of the
main battle area, slow his speed of advance, cause
him to mass, and may cau se him to divulge his
intentions. Units are a ssigned subsequent mis-
sions in the main battle area once the security area
mission has been accomplished.
The main battle area is th at portion of the battle-
field in which the decisi ve battle is fought to
defeat the enemy. It extends rearward from the
forward edge of the battle area (FEBA) to the rear
boundary of the command’ s subordinate units.
The mobility advantage that the helicopterborne
force has over the enem y’s infantry-heavy units
may allow it to defend in  greater depth. The heli-
copterborne force defend s by orienting on the
destruction of advancing enemy forces and fights
a series of battles in depth, attacking the enemy
from the front, flanks, and rear while using mini-
mal forces to maintain surveillance over the
remainder of the assigned sector. Battle positions
are selected and prepar ed throughout the main
battle area along likely avenues of approach. Pri-
mary and alternate LZs an d PZs are selected for
each battle position. Wh en enemy fires preclude
extraction of the helicopte rborne force from bat-
tle positions, covered a nd concealed routes are
selected for ground move ment to alternate PZs.
Only when absolutely necessary should a heli-
copterborne force be direct ed to occupy or retain
terrain. If there is a situation in which the reten-
tion of terr ain is essential to the defense of the
entire sector, its retention is specified.
Defensive Operations 
Against an Armor-Heavy Threat
The helicopterborne force is not well suited to
defend against armored and mechanized forces.  If
it is used to defend agai nst such forces, it should
be employed in restrictive terrain not favorable to
employment of massed armor. The HTF can be
employed in built-up ar eas, mountainous terrain,
and heavily forested ar eas. The helicopterborne
force can conduct the foll owing operations in the
armored and mechanized ba ttlefield in support of
larger defensive operations:
z Main battle area operations in restrictive terrain.
z Economy of force or reserve.
z Rear operations.
z Flank security operations.
z Limited-objective counter attack operations or
raids.
z Delay and withdrawal operations.
z Seizure of specific objectives for linkup opera-
tions.
Note
Attack helicopter and air reconnaissance 
units are best suited for employment with 
mechanized units.
Economy of Force
Defense in an economy of force role can be
accomplished by displacing units of the helicop-
terborne force in depth on avenue of approach
throughout the sector. The air reconnaissance ele-
ments can screen areas where enemy attack is
possible but unlikely. Co mbat units are reposi-
tioned to counter the ma jor enemy thrust. After
engaging the enemy and before the enemy closes
on battle positions, units are picked up from des-
ignated PZs and organized in depth. The helicop-
terborne force essentially conducts a delay. Field
artillery is repositioned as necessary to halt the
enemy advance. Attack helicopter elements
should be placed in dir ect support of the ground
commander. Elements of the helicopterborne
force held in reserve ar e rapidly transported by
helicopter into areas under enemy pressure.

--- Page 50 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 5-7 
Delay
The key to success in the delay is the com-
mander’s ability to array forces in depth before
the initiation of the dela y. Decisive engagement
is accepted only to the degree and extent neces-
sary to accomplish the delay mission. Contin-
gency plans for stay-behind operations are
developed. The helicopter borne force continually
looks for and seizes th e opportunity to launch
small-scale, offensive helicopterborne assaults
and attack helicopter raids into the enemy flanks
and rear areas. A delay may be conducted to—
z Gain time so that other forces can deploy.
z Serve as an economy-of-force measure to allow
concentration of friendly forces in other areas.
z Determine enemy composition, strength, inten-
tions, and capabilities.
z Channel the enemy into selected areas and then
destroy him.
The helicopterborne force should seldom be
given a time-delay missio n. This type of mission
requires the for ce to delay the enemy for a speci-
fied time, restrict its mobility, and subject it to
unacceptable losses. The delay in sector mission
is more appropriate. The force disengages by
helicopter before it is decisively engaged.
Against armor forces, the force should displace at
distances of no less than  the maximum effective
range of the enemy’s most capable direct fire
weapons (2,500 to 4,000 meters) and rely on
attack helicopters to  delay the armor while
friendly infantry is extracted.
SECTION III. OTHER TACTICAL 
MISSIONS AND OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
Screening
A helicopterborne screenin g force provides early
warning over an extended frontage. Screening
missions are assigned to—
z Provide timely warning of enemy approach.
z Maintain visual contact and report movement.
z Engage enemy forces within capabilities.  
z Avoid decisive engagement.
A screening mission employs a series of observa-
tion posts that overlook enemy avenues of
approach and th e areas between them. Patrols
cover dead space between the observation posts,
and they also cover other areas during limited
visibility. When contact is established, the
screening force withdraws on order, maintaining
visual and/or electr onic contact, and reports
enemy movements. As in  the delay, timely dis-
placement is critical to force survival.
Guard Force
The helicopterborne forc e can perform flank or
rear guard missions for a larger force and help
protect the main body from ground observation,
direct fire, and surprise attack. As a guard force,
the helicopterborne forc e has sufficient combat
power to attack enemy reconnaissance forces and
to delay an enemy attack until the main body can
deploy. The rear guard follows the main body,
occupying successive po sitions. The rear guard
also screens between flank positions and rear ele-
ments of the main body. The helicopterborne
force can conduct rear guard operations by mov-
ing from position to position. These movements
are controlled by using designated phaselines.

--- Page 51 ---
5-8 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
Covering Force
The air reconnaissance element can overfly rough
terrain, find the enemy,  and develop the situa-
tion. Units are deployed as necessary to ensure
the uninterrupted move ment of the main body.
The covering force unit may use one of the fol-
lowing two methods to conduct the covering
force mission:
z Reconnaissance units reconnoiter while the
helicopterborne force remains in assembly
areas or on order to be available for commit-
ment. When contact is made with the enemy
and after the air reconnaissance has developed
the situation, the helicopterborne force is com-
mitted to destroy the enemy.
z Helicopterborne units conduct covering force
operations as other forces move by bounds
behind the leading unit. A helicopterborne
force is normally not assigned as the covering
force, but it may be as signed as a subordinate
element of the covering force.
Reinforcement of Committed Units
An HTF can reinforce a committed unit:
z With uncommitted units (Reserves).
z With additional antitank assets.
z By moving artillery to weight the battle.
The MAGTF commander may also direct the
insertion of a helicopter borne unit to reinforce
threatened sectors and add depth to the battle area.
Antitank elements may be taken from a reserve
unit or a unit that is not protecting an armor
approach. Depending on the number of sections
employed, the antitank element leader accompa-
nies them for command an d control. Careful con-
sideration is given to planning the extraction of
antitank elements because they may lack ground
mobility in varying situations.
Artillery batteries can sh ift about the helicopter-
borne battlefield to ensure fire support to com-
mitted units.
Linkup Operations
When withdrawal of a helicopterborne force from
the objective area is no t planned or feasible, a
linkup operation is conducted to join two forces.
A helicopterborne force may participate as part of
a larger force, or it may conduct a linkup with its
own resources. Close coordination and detailed
planning between the comm anders of both units
are essential.  
River Crossing Operations
Helicopterborne forces may reduce CSS consid-
erations during river crossing operations by—
z Flying over the river.
z Supporting bridge construction.
z Deploying reconnaissance units by air to ver-
ify and collect essentia l intelligence on cross-
ing sites and enemy dispositions.  
z Reaching objectives on the far shore quickly,
eliminating enemy interference with develop-
ment and use of crossing sites. 
z Rapidly airlifting engineer bridging assets for-
ward, eliminating traffic problems on the cross-
ing site approaches. 
If a deliberate crossing is chosen, the helicopter-
borne force, with its in creased mobility, can be
used to clear the near shore of enemy resistance.
During the actual crossing, whether hasty or delib-
erate, the helicopterborne force can assist by—
z Attacking enemy forces th at interfere with the
crossing by seizing obj ectives that would be
secure or assist in securing the bridgehead.
z Providing flank security.
z Securing crossing sites with or without smoke.

--- Page 52 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 5-9 
Rear Area Operations
Air reconnaissance can provide wide-area sur-
veillance and security, and can be integrated into
reaction force plans. R ear area operations are
coordinated with the designated rear area com-
mander. The helicopterborne  force, as a potential
reaction force, can be called upon to contain the
enemy force if it does not have enough combat
power to destroy it. Other forces would then be
called upon to destroy the enemy.
The helicopterborne force also monitors likely
infiltration routes and pr obable target areas for
enemy attacks from the re ar in order to counter
enemy airmobile, airborne , or guerrilla infiltra-
tion threats.  Probable LZs and PZs are identified
and monitored by observation posts or remote
sensors. Potential infiltration routes in unoccu-
pied terrain are monitored with sensors to detect
the enemy as early as possible.
Night and Limited Visibility Operations
A commander may desire to take advantage of
the cover of darkness to gain maximum surprise
or deception, maintain the momentum of success-
ful operations, reinforce or withdraw committed
units, and/or deploy maneuver support elements.
The following aircraft operational requirements
must be considered duri ng night or limited visi-
bility operations:
z Desired directions and r outes of movement for
aircraft (to include id entification of selected
terrain features).
z The identity and location of LZs and/or PZs.
z Emergency ground-to-ground signals.
z Directions and points of landing for aircraft.
z The presence of LZ obstacles is indicated to
the aircraft commander through electronic/
visual navigation aids.
z Illumination level.
z Moon phase/angle.
z Cultural lighting.
z Effects of shadows.
Some advantages of limited visibility operations
areas are as follows:
z Aircraft are partially concealed from enemy
visual observation.
z Maximum surprise and confusion can be
achieved.
z Continuous pressure can be exerted on the
enemy.
z Effective enemy air defense fire and interdic-
tion by enemy aircraft are diminished.
However, disadvantages of limited visibility
operations also exist. The need for more elaborate
control measures and the caution required by
both aviators and troops slow operations. How-
ever, with proper equipm ent, constant training,
and a thorough knowledge of  techniques, these
disadvantages may be ove rcome. The following
factors are considered:
z More time is required for planning, preparing,
and executing.
z Formation flight is more  difficult, and forma-
tions are more dispersed.
z LZs/PZs should be larger.
z Navigation is more difficult.
z Additional illumination is planned and must be
immediately available in case it is necessary for
mission accomplishment.
Operations in a Nuclear,
Biological, and Chemical Environment
In the event of a nuclear  attack, helicopterborne
forces can conduct a ra diological survey and,
when feasible, move into the target area after the
explosion to stall enemy exploitation of its effect.
helicopterborne forces can rapidly and safely
bypass obstacles created by a nuclear strike,
whether their objective is within or beyond the
target area.

--- Page 53 ---
5-10 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
When planning helicopte rborne operations in
conjunction with frie ndly nuclear munitions
employment, the planner must consider the—
z Effects of intense light on pilot vision.
z Effects of intense heat on equipment and per-
sonnel.
z Effects of blast waves on aircraft in flight.
z Residual radiation rates on the zones.
z Utilization of LZs/PZs ; however, debris may
prohibit their use.
z Effects of electromagne tic pulse on electronic
equipment.
z Selection of approach and retirement lanes into
possible contamination LZs.
z Use of alternate LZs if primary zones have too
high a residual radiation rate.
Planning for helicopterborne operations in a toxic
environment also includes reconnaissance of
areas known or suspected of contamination, elec-
tion of routes and positi ons with regard to con-
taminated areas to avoid s tirring up or spreading
agents with rotor wash, and protection of supplies
and equipment. The three principles of NBC
operations (contamination avoidance, protection,
and decontamination) are fundamental to sur-
vival during helicopterborne operations con-
ducted in an NBC environment.
If helicopterborne operations must be conducted
following contaminatio n, the helicopterborne
force may direct that hasty (spot) decontamina-
tion of aircraft be accomplished. Spot decontami-
nation is an effective means of decontaminating
specific areas of an airc raft. This sustains flight
operation since certain functional areas are
treated before they are touched. Surfaces must be
washed with decontaminan ts to flush agents off
the aircraft’s exterior. Small amounts of the NBC
agent (absorbed into the fuselage paint) will
probably remain after decontaminating. The
evaporation of these residues can create a vapor
hazard; therefore, pers onnel in and around the
aircraft continue  to wear the protective mask and
gloves. Decontamination reduces the hazard of
agent contact and transfer. NBC personnel are
trained in spot-deconta mination procedures but
may require equipment a nd support to effect all
required decontamination quickly.

--- Page 54 ---
CHAPTER 6
COMBAT SUPPORT WITHIN THE HELICOPTERBORNE FORCE
Knowing combat support capabilities, assigning
combat support units ap propriate missions, and
controlling combat suppor t operations are essen-
tial to the application of superior combat power at
the decisive time and place. The commander
requires a complete un derstanding of MAGTF
concepts in order to appropriately use combat
support to enhance the combat power of the
maneuver element. Combat support is organized
under the GCE’s command an d control. In most
cases, it is the GC E commander who assigns
combat support units thei r specific missions. The
GCE commander also task-organizes combat
support units for movement and assigns support
relationships for subordinate maneuver units.
Combat support units are normally in direct sup-
port of the helicopterborne  force  to ensure the
close coordination and continuous, dedicated sup-
port required in helicopterborne operations. In
some situations, combat support units are attached.
In most cases, combat support units are assigned to
support the GCE. The GCE may assign combat
support units that are attach ed to or in direct sup-
port if the unit could be more effectively con-
trolled or employed by on e particular unit rather
than under the GCE commander’s control. General
support is used when co mbat support units can
best support the operatio n under centralized con-
trol in order to quickly shift its efforts to the point
needed. Regardless of the assigned support status,
the GCE has the responsibility to ensure that com-
bat support units are properly supported. Although
the GCE is not required to provide support to the
units in direct support, it is advantageous to ensure
that combat support units  are properly supported.
This means providing ra tions, fuel, and ammuni-
tion as required. It also means expediting repair of
equipment outside the capabilities of the GCE.
This enables combat support units to provide con-
tinuous support to the GCE.
The commander of the co mbat support unit must
be both a commander and a special staff officer.
This means he commands his unit and provides
advice and assistance to  the helicopterborne
GCE, the MAGTF comman der, and the MAGTF
staff. He serves as a sp ecial staff officer during
the planning phase of an operation, providing
assistance and advice in the preparation of the
operation order (OPORD).  He can also provide
limited advice and assistance during the conduct
of the operation, but his primary concern is com-
mand of his unit.
SECTION I. FIRE SUPPORT
Fire support is the collective and coordinated
employment of mortars, artillery (to include Mul-
tiple Launch Rocket Sy stems [MLRSs] and high
mobility artillery rocket systems [HIMARSs]),
attack helicopters , CAS, naval gunfire, and other
fires in support of the battle. The mission of the
fire support system is to destroy, neutralize, or
suppress surface targets in  support of helicopter-
borne operations. It also includes SEAD, which is
imperative in helicopterb orne operations. The
commander integrates the firepower of mortars,
artillery, CAS, EW, and, when available, naval

--- Page 55 ---
6-2 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
gunfire, with the maneuv er of the helicopter-
borne force’s combat power to–
z Destroy, suppress, and neutralize targets.
z Obscure the vision of enemy forces.
z Isolate enemy formations and positions.
z Slow and canalize enemy movements.
z Destroy, delay, disrupt, or limit the enemy at
ranges greater than that of direct fire weapons.
z Screen with smoke or  create obstacle areas
with the employment of scatterable mines.
z Reduce the effects of en emy artillery by active
counterfire.
z Interdict follow-on enemy echelons.
z Provide illumination.
To effectively utilize fire support assets, the heli-
copterborne force must understand artillery sup-
port relationships. The artillery commander
commands his unit and serv es as a special staff
officer to the helicopterborne force commander
during operational planning and preparation. If
the task force is operat ing independently, it may
be necessary to attach an  artillery unit to provide
adequate fire support. Attachment is a nonstand-
ard mission and involves special considerations
for the task force commander, such as the respon-
sibility to provide security, logistical support, and
lift capability to the artillery unit.
Fire Support Coordinator
While the helicopterborne force commander is
responsible for the integr ation of all fires within
the scheme of maneuver, the FSC is his principal
assistant for the proper integration and applica-
tion of fire support. The EFL and all FAC(A)s
must work closely with  the FSC during planning
in order to ensure unity of effort and understand-
ing during the operation. The commander and his
FSC generate the maximu m combat power avail-
able to support the operation.
Fire Support Delivery Means
The helicopterborne force is unique in its mis-
sion, organization, and support elements. Mis-
sion commanders must tailor the planned fire
support for a helicopterborne operation specifi-
cally for that mission. Indirect fire assets must be
maneuverable and capable of maintaining the
rapid pace of the helic opterborne force. The fire
support delivery means available to the helicop-
terborne force may include the following:
z Mortars, organic to ea ch rifle company and
infantry battalion, provide close-in fire support.
z Artillery must either be positioned well forward
to provide fires from th e PZ to the objective
area or must be air lift ed with the helicopter-
borne force to the objective.
z Supporting air defense units can provide air
defense support if the situation demands and
the commander directs.
z CAS will be available to provide support. Pre-
planned missions should be used to the maxi-
mum extent possible. CAS aircraft can be used
to screen approach and retirement lanes.
Because of their mobility and firepower, attack
helicopters may be integr ated into the fire sup-
port plan when other fire support means are not
available. Mission priority for attack helicop-
ters is to escort transport helicopters.
z Naval gunfire spot team s may be attached to
the helicopterborne forc e if naval gunfire is
available.

--- Page 56 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 6-3 
SECTION II. FIRE SUPPORT 
PLANNING AND COORDINATION
Fire support planning ad dresses how fire support
is to be used to support maneuver forces. Fire
support coordination entail s those actions needed
to implement plans and manage resources on the
battlefield. A lthough planning an d coordination
are separated, they overlap  and are mutually sup-
porting in the fire support process. The planning
and coordination process begins when the mis-
sion is received or assu med. If planning is suc-
cessful, then implemen tation (coordination) of
the plan gives the co mmander the support he
needs to win. For more discussion on fire sup-
port planning and coordination, see MCWP 3-16,
Fire Support Coordination in the Ground Com-
bat Element.
The range of supporting artillery is an initial con-
sideration when planning helicopterborne opera-
tions since helicopterbor ne operations may often
be conducted beyond the range of artillery sup-
port. If a helicopterborne  operation is beyond the
range of artillery support,  planners must consider
prepositioning artillery forward prior to the
assault or planning for additional fire support
(e.g., naval gunfire, CAS, and attack helicopter)
until direct support artille ry can move into the
area of operation.
The following factors shou ld be considered dur-
ing planning:
z LZ preparations may be fired in support of a
helicopterborne assault. 
z Preparations are directed against known, sus-
pected, or likely enem y positions dominating
the LZ or on the zone itself.
z The effect of fire on creating obstacles to
friendly forces during landing or maneuver.
z Whether the effect of th e preparation justifies
loss to tactical surprise or affords the enemy
sufficient time to change his tactical disposition.
z The use of fire support on the LZ itself to deto-
nate mines/boobytraps or to reduce obstacles.
z Firing of dummy preparations to deceive the
enemy.
z Possible conflict betwee n gun-target lines and
helicopter approach lanes.
z Availability of both fi re support units and
ammunition.
z Fires must be planned to support the consolida-
tion of the LZ and subsequent operations.
z SEAD during both the approach and retirement
of a helicopter is fundamental to its success and
survival.
Formal and Informal Planning
A formal/informal planning  approach at the heli-
copterborne force level is a combined process
that uses the principles of both formal (down-
ward) and informal (upwar d) planning. Initially,
the FSC disseminates, in the OPORD, a fire sup-
port plan to support the force. The fire support
coordination plan is modi fied as company plans
are received. The rewritten fire plan is dissemi-
nated to supporting arms systems for execution.
Displacement of Fire Support
During the planning of fi re support for a helicop-
terborne operation, the FSC must consider the
possibility of displaceme nt. If artillery can sup-

--- Page 57 ---
6-4 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
port the helicopterborne force’s movement from a
secure area (without disp lacing forward) then it
does so. If such suppor t is not feasible, the FSC
determines if other fire support is sufficient to
accomplish the mission. If other support is not
sufficient, it may be nece ssary to displace the
artillery into the objective area. Once the decision
to displace is made, th e following must be con-
sidered:
z Displacement is accomplished by echelon to
prevent temporary loss of artillery support.
z Artillery requires security in the objective area.
z The CH-53 will probably be required to dis-
place the artillery un it. Ammunition resupply
will probably have to be done by air.
z Artillery must depend on helicopter assets for
mobility unless prime movers can be lifted into
the objective area.
z Supporting artillery must be available.
Enemy Air Defense
In helicopterborne opera tions, SEAD is a critical
fire support task because  assault support helicop-
ters are especially vulnerable to enemy air
defense; therefore, SEAD must be addressed dur-
ing planning. Unless ther e are overriding tactical
considerations, enemy air defense positions
should always be avoide d. If enemy air defense
positions cannot be avoided, they must be aggres-
sively suppressed. SEAD may be executed either
as scheduled fires based on a specific time sched-
ule or SEAD may be fired on call based on the
movement of the helicopterborne force through
predetermined approach and retirement lanes or
across predetermined phase lines.
The FSC ensures that all flight routes and sus-
pected enemy air defense artillery sites are tar-
geted with preplanned fires. The FSC is normally
located with the commander  and requires a dedi-
cated fire direction net in order to control the lift-
ing and/or shifting of SE AD fires as directed by
the commander. Fixed-wing or rotary-wing air-
craft providing escort suppresses enemy air
defenses encountered en route. 
Fire Support Coordination
Fire support coordination ensures that targets are
adequately covered by a suitable weapon or
group of weapons. Some typical fire support
coordination tasks include—
z Clearing requests for fire support.
z Selecting the best supporting arms to attack a
target.
z Requesting additional fire support when
needed.
z Responding to intelligence reports by request-
ing supporting arms to attack high-payoff tar-
gets and high-value targets.
z Coordinating the simultan eous use of different
supporting arms, particul arly aircraft and sur-
face weapons.
z Synchronizing fires in support of maneuver
elements.
The FSC ensures that the developed plan remains
supportable. The FSC must immediately inform
the commander or the S-3 if there is not enough
fire support allocated to make the plan work or if
changes are necessary to the plan. To do this, the
FSC must be located forward with the command
group during the conduct of the helicopterborne
operation. For example, wh en a C2 helicopter is
used, the FSC normally flies with the commander.
The FSC keeps abreast of the tactical situation and
coordinates all fire supp ort impacting the opera-
tion. The FSC ensures that fires do not jeopardize
troop safety, interfere w ith other fire support
means, or disrupt adjacent unit operations. Dur-
ing conduct of the operation, shifts in priorities of
fire, changes to the fire plan to support a change
in scheme of maneuver, and immediate CAS are
all handled by the FSC w ho, in close conjunction
with the S-3 and air officer, coordinates fire con-
trol activities of the helicopterborne force.

--- Page 58 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 6-5 
Fire support is contro lled by maneuver units.
Additionally, all air officers and FACs are trained
to call for and adjust i ndirect fires. FAC(A)s and
TAC(A)s can assist the helicopterborne force in
coordinating or adjusting indirect fires since their
location may allow them to see the battlefield.
SECTION III. ARTILLERY 
HELICOPTERBORNE OPERATIONS
The helicopterborne force fights both offensive
and defensive battles. Therefore, its organiza-
tional tactics, which emph asize the use of artil-
lery and aerial mobility and flexibilit y, require
special planning considerations for employment.
Planning Considerations
Range of Artillery and Other Support Systems
Helicopterborne operations typically occur over
extended distances. Therefore, the FSC must posi-
tion fire support systems so they can range (place
fire) and mass (concentrate fire) on targets within
the helicopterborne area of  operation. If the force
must operate out of artille ry range, there is a
greater dependence on CAS and mortars.
Importance of the Target
Artillery is positioned to range those targets con-
sidered critical to th e maneuver commander. For
high value targets, th e commander and the FSC
may consider moving arti llery by helicopter to
strike deep in the enem y’s rear by firing across
the FLOT or displacing laterally in sector.
Airlift Assets
The air movement of art illery requires a heavy
use of air assets. Commanders must consider the
total cost of moving not just the howitzers,
ammunition, and personnel , but also the mainte-
nance and supplies need ed to sustain the air-
delivered artillery. These total costs must include
appropriate survivability moves. 
Risk in Crossing Lines
A major consideration in planning the movement
of artillery in helicopterb orne operations is the
risk in crossing enemy lines/positi ons. The value
of the target is weighe d against the chances of
survivability. Once the risk of moving artillery by
helicopter is consider ed, the S-3 and FSC must
evaluate the surv ivability of the artillery unit
while on the ground and during extraction from
the firing area.
Target Location
Artillery movement in helicopterborne operations
requires pinpoint LZ and target locations. Accu-
racy of locations determines accuracy of fires and
targets are often engaged with unobserved fires.
Pickup Zone and/or Landing Zone
Artillery displacements require PZs and LZs
large enough to position equipment. When the
artillery unit arrives at th e LZ, it must be secure
and capable of providing the unit with individual
gun position(s).
Ammunition
The amount of available ammunition has a major
impact on artillery sup port in helicopterborne
operations. When planning indirect fire support,

--- Page 59 ---
6-6 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
the FSC must consider the amount of ammunition
required and the availab ility of transportation
assets. Artillery ammun ition supply operations
place a significant burden on aviation assets
available to the helicopterborne force.
Communications
In the employment of artillery, the ability to
maintain communications is a requirement. The
supporting unit must be w ithin radio range of the
supported unit to receive the call for fire (espe-
cially when positioning the M198 with its maxi-
mum range of 30 kilo meters [km]). Unless
unavoidable, firing batteries must be within com-
munications range of their parent battalion.
Security
During helicopterborne operations, artillery relies
on terrain positioning and infantry for security. 
Capabilities
The only howitzer in the MAGTF inventory is the
M198. The M198 has a nonrocket-assisted projec-
tile range of 18,100 meters and its range extends
to 30,000 meters with a rocket-assisted projectile.
Marine forces can also anticipate the presence of
MLRS and HIMARS firi ng in general support.
These weapons can range to 60 km with rockets
and 100 to 300 km with Army tactical missile
systems. The CH -53E can lift the M198 and its
prime mover, the M923, 5-ton truck. 
Note
The CH-53E is currently rated to lift the me-
dium tactical vehicle replacement 7-ton 
truck, which is replacing the M923, 5-ton 
truck. However, it almost reaches it perfor-
mance limits when lifting the 7-ton truck. 
The service life extension program for the 
CH-53E should make lifting this vehicle a 
much more viable mission. 
SECTION IV. AIR DEFENSE 
IN HELICOPTERBORNE OPERATIONS
Helicopterborne operations conducted in areas of
the battlefield where th e MAGTF does not enjoy
air superiority will be difficult. Air superiority,
according to Joint Publication (JP) 1-02, Depart-
ment of Defense Dictionary of Military and Asso-
ciated Terms, is “that degree of dominance in the
air battle of one force over another that permits
the conduct of operations  by the former and its
related land, sea, and air forces at a given time
and place without prohib itive interference by the
opposing force.” Therefore,  the effective use of
limited MAGTF air defe nse assets becomes an
important consideration in planning and execut-
ing helicopterborne opera tions. Since the number
and type of air defense systems that can accom-
pany a helicopterborne force are limited, and
because helicopters are vu lnerable to attacking
aircraft and enemy gr ound-based air defense
weapons, intelligence info rmation must be reli-
able. The commander must consider the feasibil-
ity of using helicopters as  the tactical situation
changes. In addition to  employing active air
defenses, helicopterborn e forces must maximize
the use of passive air defense measures, such as
flying at night, using terrain flight techniques,
and using dispersed flight formations.
Capabilities
Ideally, effective offensive antiair warfare opera-
tions and the MAGTF’s Integrated Air Defense
System (IADS) provide air superiority through-
out the MAGTF’s area of responsibility. The ACE
commander attempts to es tablish an IADS that
provides an air defense umbrella over the entire

--- Page 60 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 6-7 
battlefield. Some helicopterborne operations have
LZs in areas that cannot be adequately covered by
the MAGTF’s existing IADS; therefore, it will be
necessary to provide the helicopterborne unit with
air defense assets specif ically designated for the
operation.
The scope of the operati on and the air threat, as
well as the availability of air defense assets, deter-
mines the type of air de fense assets provided to
the helicopterborne unit. In addition to dedicated
air defense systems and air-to-air capable air-
craft, commanders should consider the air defense
capabilities of their unit’s organic small arms and
crew-served weapons. These weapons provide an
excellent low altitude ai r defense capability. The
key to the employment of  these weapons against
low-flying aircraft is co ordinated, high-volume
fire. See MCWP 3-11.2, Marine Rifle Squad , for
more information concerning the use of organic
small arms and crew-served weapons in an air
defense role.
The employment principles  for air defense weap-
ons are essentially the sa me for helicopterborne
operations as for other operations. Command and
support relationships betw een air defense units
and supported arms must be clearly defined.
These relationships are modified, as necessary, as
the operation progresses. MCWP 3-25.10, Low
Altitude Air Defense Handbook , provides a com-
plete description of command and support rela-
tionships, as well as the steps a commander
should take in establis hing an effective air
defense plan.
Planning Considerations
As part of the helicopterborne operation plan-
ning process, the MAGT F commander and major
subordinate commanders develop an air defense
plan that supports the operation. The goal of the
air defense plan is to provide continuous air
defense coverage  for the helic opterborne force
from the time it le aves the PZs un til it completes
its mission. Commanders consider the following
during development of the air defense plan:
z Regimental scheme of maneuver.
z Regimental commander’s  air defense priori-
ties based on evaluation of each asset for criti-
cality, recuperability, and vulnerability. See
chapter 5 of MCWP 3-25.10 for a complete
discussion of this evaluation process.
z Threat characteristics are used to determine the
appropriate air defense sy stem(s) to defend the
specific asset:
„ Enemy location and strength.
„ Type of enemy aircraft and ordnance.
„ Past enemy attack characteristics.
„ Enemy doctrine.
z The tactical and technical capabilities and limi-
tations of each MAGTF air defense systems.
z Aircraft employed in an  active air defense role
must be maneuverable.
z Surface-to-air missile (SAM) systems’ (i.e., the
Stinger) nighttime engagement capabilities are
marginal without NVDs. Poor weather and lim-
ited visibility also limit a SAM’s usefulness. 
z Terrain limits tactical  defense alert radar
(TDAR) capabilities by causing radar masking.
TDAR-equipped units sh ould be located to
minimize radar masking, while reducing signa-
ture problems (smoke, electronic, visual) as
much as possible. 
z Terrain and weather impact both the enemy
and the effectiveness of the MAGTF’s air
defense weapons. 
z Stinger team firing positions (primary and
alternate) should provi de ready access to the
organic vehicle. Sti nger teams require good
mobility to ensure thei r survivability, espe-
cially after conducting an engagement that
reveals their position. 
z Widely dispersed, highly  mobile air defense
units under an IADS re quire centralized com-
mand (by the ACE commander through the
Marine air command and control system),
decentralized control ( down to the lowest pos-
sible echelon), and reliable communications.

--- Page 61 ---
6-8 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
Using Helicopters to 
Support Air Defense Operations
In addition to supporting helicopterborne opera-
tions, Stinger units can us e helicopters to occupy
firing positions that ar e normally not accessible
by wheeled or tracked vehicles. Using helicop-
ters, Stinger units can ea sily cross terrain obsta-
cles and rapidly bypass ho stile areas. In addition
to standard helicopter employment methods, the
use of repelling, fast rope, and special patrol
insertion and extraction techniques can greatly
enhance a Stinger unit’s ability to provide effec-
tive air defense for supp orted units. Using these
techniques, Stinger teams can quickly deploy to
sites on hilltops and othe r terrain features that
lack adequate areas fo r helicopter LZs. These
sites can give Stinger teams increased surveil-
lance and overwatch capab ilities, allowing them
to detect and engage host ile aircraft at the maxi-
mum range of the Stinger system.
When positioning Stinge r units via helicopters,
commanders must consider  their relative lack of
mobility once they deba rk. Because Stinger
launch signatures are highl y visible, the enemy
can easily locate the fi ring positions from which
the missiles are launche d. After firing, Stinger
units located in particul arly vulnerable positions
must quickly displace to alternate firing positions.
Without their organic vehi cles, Stinger units are
extremely susceptible to enemy counterattacks.

--- Page 62 ---
CHAPTER 7
COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT
The HST provides CSS to  helicopterborne opera-
tions. CSS for helicopterborne operations must be
planned, organized, and executed to support a
rapid tempo in highly mobile and widely dis-
persed operations. 
Just as the helic opterborne unit is tailored to
move by air, CSS must be  tailored to sustain the
helicopterborne unit by ai r. Therefore, planners
must be prepared to ad apt and to be innovative
with available resources. 
SECTION I. HELICOPTER SUPPORT TEAM
The helicopterborne unit is supported by organic,
attached, and external CSSEs organized to push
forces, supplies, materi al, and ammunition for-
ward by air. The prima ry CSS organization
within the helicopterborne unit is the HST. The
HST is a task organization formed and equipped
for employment in a LZ in  order to facilitate the
landing and movement of helicopterborne troops,
equipment, and supplies to and within the LZ and
PZ and to evacuate se lected casualties and
POWs. The HST performs tasks within a PZ or
LZ similar to those perfor med by the shore party
team/group in the beach support area. The func-
tioning of the HST is th e responsibility of the
helicopterborne unit commander. An HST is
expected to accomplish the following tasks:
z Prepare, maintain, a nd mark landing sites,
remove or mark obst acles, and set up wind
direction indicators.
z Establish and maintain  required communica-
tions to include communications with support-
ing helicopters and supporting CSS units.
z Reconnoiter and select areas adjacent to land-
ing sites for supply dumps and other CSS
installations, HST command posts, casualty
evacuation stations, and defensive positions.
z Provide LZ security.
z Direct and control heli copter operations within
the LZ and support helicopter units landing in
the zone.
z Provide sites for emerge ncy helicopter repair
units and refueling facilities.
z Unload helicopters (including external lifts).
z Load cargo nets, pallet s, and casualties on
board for return trips.
z Establish dumps, issue supplies to units, and
maintain necessary records of supplies received,
issued, and available.
z Provide personnel and vehicle ground control.
z Maintain situation map and information center.
z Provide emergency helic opter repair and refu-
eling, if required.
z Evacuate POWs.
z Perform firefighting duties in the LZ.
Helicopter Support Team Organization
The HST is a task-organized unit composed of
personnel and equipment of the helicopterborne
force and the supporting aviation unit, with aug-
mentation from other units as required. HST
organization is determined by the operation. Nor-
mally, the HST is employed in each PZ and LZ to
provide support to units  operating in and around
those zones. The HST no rmally consists of an
advance party, headquarters, helicopter control
element, and LZ platoon.

--- Page 63 ---
7-2 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
Advance Party
The advance party contains personnel from all
elements of the HST: command, reconnaissance,
communications, and LZ control. It consists of
approximately 8 to 10 Marines with hand-carried
equipment.
The officer in charge of the advance party makes
contact with the senior Marine of the reconnais-
sance unit who provided the initial helicopter ter-
minal guidance and receiv es a briefing of the LZ
and adjacent areas. The of ficer in charge of the
advance party assumes ope rational control over
the HST reconnaissance unit and retains this con-
trol until the helicopter control element of the
HST assumes responsibility for the helicopter
control activities. Advance party personnel recon-
noiter positions for the various landin g sites and
points to be located wi thin the LZ. Communica-
tions personnel estab lish communications with
the HST commander (or helicopterborne unit tac-
tical-logistical group du ring amphibious opera-
tions) within the LZ, as well as communications
with the helicopter uni t and the helicopterborne
force command post. LZ control personnel con-
trol the helicopters operating within the LZ.
When the HST is establ ished in the LZ, the
advance party disbands and its personnel revert to
their parent element within the HST.
HST Headquarters
The headquarters element may be provided from
the service platoon of the helicopterborne unit
when no CSS buildup is planned or from the
landing support platoon if a CSS buildup is
planned. Providing landi ng support personnel to
the helicopterborne unit to form the HST head-
quarters when a CSS bu ildup is planned facili-
tates the transfer of cont rol of the LZ to the CSS
unit when the CSS buildup commences. The HST
headquarters consists of—
z A command section provided by the appropriate
platoon headquarters, augmented as required.
z A communications sec tion provided by the
communications platoon of the helicopterborne
unit or the communica tions platoon, headquar-
ters and service compa ny, landing support bat-
talion as appropriate.
z A military police secti on consisting of person-
nel from the military police company, division
headquarters battalion or headquarters and ser-
vice battalion, force service support group
(FSSG) as appropriate.
z A security section provi ded by the helicopter-
borne unit to provide internal security.
z An evacuation section provided by the medi-
cal section of the helicopterborne unit.
z An HST liaison section normally accompanies
the headquarters element of the helicopterborne
unit.
Other MAGTF Support
The HST is task-organized  to provide responsive
support to a helicopterbor ne force. To complete
its mission, the HST performs many diverse tasks
in HST operations, wh ich are normally per-
formed by different organizations within the
MAGTF. The MAGTF cont ributes to the mis-
sion of HST operations by providing personnel
and equipment. The MAGTF organizations and
the normal responsibilitie s of those organizations
that support the HST are as follows:
z The helicopterborne unit provides overall com-
mand and control of the HST and integrates
HST operations into the tactical order.
z The MAGTF command element provides the
required direction and support to the helicop-
terborne unit.
z The MAGTF S-2 provides the intelligence nec-
essary to plan the lift and to conduct a recon-
naissance of the proposed LZ.
z The ACE provides the aircraft/aircrew, air con-
trol, and other suppor t elements that are
required by the mission.

--- Page 64 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 7-3 
z The GCE provides attachments, detachments,
and fire support as necessary to support the
helicopterborne unit.
z The CSSE provides att achments and detach-
ments to the helicopter borne unit as necessary
to ensure all CSS requirements beyond the
organic capabilities of the helicopterborne unit
are met.
Landing Support Battalion
The landing support battalion is a CSS unit with a
unique role. It facilitates the distribution of criti-
cal, high-volume, consum able supplies through-
out the MAGTF. These s upplies are heavy and
large and, therefore, pres ent a difficult challenge
even in normal opera tions. In helicopterborne
operations, the difficulty  of distributing these
supplies is magnified.
Landing support units are present in all task-orga-
nized MAGTF CSS or ganizations. During
amphibious operations, landing support personnel
play a major role in the planning and execution of
landing force support pa rty operations. Landing
support personnel play a key role in the FSSG,
brigade service support group, and Marine expe-
ditionary unit service s upport group. In helicop-
terborne operations, landing support  personnel
are a critical part of the HST and follow-on com-
bat service support detachments (CSSDs) that
support the helicopterborne force.
Equipment
The landing support battalion is the unit that con-
tains the majority of th e MAGTF’s tactical mate-
rials handling equipment (MHE). By centralizing
MHE, the MAGTF comman der ensures that suf-
ficient MHE can be quickly  massed at the point
of main effort; a capability that would not exist if
MHE was permanently distributed among all
MAGTF units. This centr alization process also
holds true for helicopter  slings, cargo nets, and
other specialized equipm ent used during helicop-
terborne operations. Cent ralization also ensures
that there are dedicated personnel that maintain
equipment in a ready c ondition. Centralization
can also be used as an  economy of force. For
example, the landing suppo rt battalion is respon-
sible for providing MHE and specialized equip-
ment to helicopterborne units regardless of
whether or not a CSS buildup is planned for a
helicopterborne operation.
Training
When operations require the employment of heli-
copterborne units, landing support services, par-
ticularly HST services, ar e vital to the success of
the operation. However, there are not sufficient
landing support personnel within the MAGTF to
perform all required HS T tasks for operational
success, especially in a large operation. There-
fore, training of othe r MAGTF units by landing
support units enhances the MAGTF’s ability to
exploit the inherent mob ility of the MAGTF. All
combat and combat support units must be trained
and capable of moving their internal vehicles,
equipment, and supplie s without augmentation
from the landing support battalion.
Employment
The criteria for employi ng landing support units
and helicopterborne unit  personnel to provide
HST services in helic opterborne operations are
not intended to limit landing supp ort involve-
ment, their intention is to facilitate the most effi-
cient use of trained HST personnel. If it is
determined that a helicopterborne unit lacks suffi-
cient organic personnel to perform all of the
required HST tasks, la nding support augmenta-
tion should be requested even if a logistic buildup
is not planned. Combat and combat support units
must be capable of movi ng their vehicles, equip-
ment, and supplies wi thout augmentation from
the landing support battalion.

--- Page 65 ---
7-4 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
SECTION II. COMBAT 
SERVICE SUPPORT PLANNING
Considerations Prior to Planning
Before planning CSS for helicopterborne opera-
tions, commanders a nd CSS personnel must
understand the inherent characteristics of helicop-
terborne operations. Ba sed on this understand-
ing, they will implement CSS with the flexibility
and prompt response time  required to meet the
needs of a helicopterborne operation. There are
key point and specific points about helicopter-
borne operations that mu st be understood before
any detailed discussion of CSS can commence.
Key Points
The CSS planner must understand the following
key points of helicopterborne operations:
z Helicopterborne operations are inherently com-
plex evolutions, requirin g detailed integration
of all MAGTF capabilities: aviation, ground,
and CSS.
z To be effective, he licopterborne operations
must be planned and executed rapidly to
exploit transient enemy vulnerabilities as they
occur. The MAGTF must be able to exploit
these vulnerabilities before the enemy can take
corrective action.
z MAGTF organizations must be trained, men-
tally prepared, and have SOPs in place in antic-
ipation of the opportunity to exploit an enemy
vulnerability. When th e vulnerability occurs
and the opportunity presents itself, the
MAGTF must be capable of timely action.
z Accurate and timely intelligence is critical.
Placing a helicopterborne  force in the wrong
place at the wrong time can result in loss of
personnel, equipment, and opportunities.
Specific Points
The specific points that need to be understood by
the CSS planner are as follows:
z To ensure unity of effo rt during a helicopter-
borne operation, all MAGTF units that will
move to and remain in  the objective area are
initially attached or placed in direct support to
the helicopterborne unit. The initiating head-
quarters of the OPORD specifies when or
under what conditions control of units attached
to the helicopterb orne unit passes back to the
parent organizations.
z Confusion that disrupt s the rapid buildup of
combat power into the objective area can prove
to be fatal. One way to  avoid confusion is to
form an HST for all tactical helicopterborne
operations to ensure a rapid, organized, and
efficient buildup of ba lanced combat power in
the objective area.
z An HST operation in support of a helicopter-
borne operation is the responsibility of the
HUC. The HUC receives support and augmen-
tation from the other MAGTF organizations to
form his HST, but the responsibility for the
execution of all HST ta sks remains with the
HUC.
z Personnel of the division or force reconnais-
sance units normally pr ovide helicopter termi-
nal guidance for the ini tial assault waves. ITG
is especially critical for night helicopterborne
operations. Once established in the LZ, the
HST assumes responsibilit y for helicopter ter-
minal guidance and the HUC or higher head-
quarters, as appropriate, assigns reconnaissance
personnel follow-on missions.
z HST operations are normally terminated when
the helicopterborne unit no longer depends on
helicopter support as the primary means of
CSS support or when a planned CSS buildup
commences in the LZ.
z The helicopterborne unit and units that pro-
vide attachments to th e helicopterborne units
are responsible for prep aring, rigging (attach-
ing slings), and hookin g up (to the helicopters)
their organic equipment and supplies for exter-
nal helicopter lift. This capability is acquired
and maintained through training.

--- Page 66 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 7-5 
z Within the MAGTF, slings and cargo nets used
for external helicopter lifts are centrally con-
trolled and managed by the landing support
unit.  Landing support units provide training
assistance in LZ operations to include external
lifts to MAGTF units.
z The role of landing s upport battalion units in
support of the HUC vari es depending on the
helicopterborne unit’ s mission. The landing
support unit may be ta sked by the HUC with
complete responsibilit y for the organization
and functioning of LZs/PZs or the assigned
tasks may be limited to providing MHE and
personnel and to prov iding and controlling
slings for external lifts when required.
z Understanding the difference between a CSS
buildup and a basic load is critical.
Planning Considerations
It is imperative that th e helicopterborne unit and
supporting CSS unit coordinate closely during the
planning of helicopterbor ne operations from the
initial stages onward. Concurrent planning
ensures that all requirem ents and constraints of
CSS are considered. It also provides the lead time
necessary to organize and position the CSS
resources required to su pport the operation. The
HST is an essential link between the operational
scheme and the CSS plan . Close and continuous
coordination between th e helicopterborne unit
and the supporting CSS unit ensures adequate
CSS throughout the operation. To organize CSS
for helicopterborne opera tions, the CSS planner
must consider the following:
z The helicopterborne unit’s mission and the
concept and duration of the operation.
z CSS buildup, if planned.
z The task organization (including densities of
personnel, weapon sy stems by type, equip-
ment by type, and aircraft by type).
z Enemy situation, weather, and terrain.
z Helicopter availability and distances between
supporting and supported units.
z Ammunition, water, food, and aviation fuel
consumption rates.
CSS planning must ensure  that CSS is provided,
not only for the organic and attached elements of
the helicopterborne unit, but also for units provid-
ing direct and general support. The helicopter-
borne unit is responsible for planning CSS for its
organic and attached units. The higher headquar-
ters that initiates the he licopterborne operation is
responsible for coordinating CSS planning of
units that provide direct  and general support to
the helicopterborne uni t. This planning must
expressly designate w ho will provide combat
support to all participat ing units th roughout the
helicopterborne operation. When an attachment
joins the helicopterborne unit, the attachment
brings the appropriate amounts of its own CSS
assets from its parent unit. These attached assets
are controlled by the HUC.  
Basic Load and 
Combat Service Support Buildup
The basic load and the re supply of the basic load
are not considered a CSS buildup. The unit brings
the basic load with it a nd when the basic load is
depleted, its own unit performs resupply. A CSS
buildup takes place when supplies beyond the
basic load are moved to the objective area.
Basic Load
A helicopterborne unit, based on its mission,
moves to the objective area by helicopter with the
necessary personnel, equipment, and a basic load
of consumable supplies to accomplish the mis-
sion. The higher headquarters that assigns the
mission to the helicopter borne unit also deter-
mines the helicopterborne unit’s basic load.

--- Page 67 ---
7-6 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
The basic load for all cl asses of consumable sup-
plies except ammunition (class V) is expressed in
day(s) of supply (DOS).  A DOS is the amount of
supplies a unit requires to sustain itself in com-
bat for one day. For example, a DOS for—
z Food: three meals, ready to eat per individual.
z Water: 3 to 4 gallons per individual per day in
a temperate zone, but amounts are higher in
both hot and cold climates.
z Fuel: the total fuel c onsumption of all equip-
ment is specified in the table of authorized
material. Other supplies: e.g., sandbags, barbed
wire, repair parts, are normally specified on the
unit SOP.
The basic load for ammuni tion has two parts: a
basic allowance (BA) and a day(s) of ammunition
(DOA). The BA is the quantity of ammunition
(number of rounds) the Marine Corps has speci-
fied to be maintained by a unit for each weapon
that unit employs in comb at. A DOA is the total
of the standard consumption rates for each
organic and attached weapon when employed in
combat. A DOA is further specified into an
assault rate and a sustained rate. The assault rate,
which is a higher consumpt ion than the sustained
rate, is specified for un its conducting offensive
operations. The sustained rate is specified when a
unit is not conducting offensive operations. An
example of a unit basi c load would be one DOA
assault rate and one DOA sustained rate, two
DOS. The BA is always  a requirement, so it is
implied and normally no t stated. In addition to
the BA, the unit in the example will carry a DOA
calculated at the higher assault rate to cover the
initial assault and anothe r DOA calculated at the
sustained rate. The unit w ill also carry sufficient
consumable supplies to su stain itself in combat
for 2 days without resupply.  
The basic load is issued  to, controlled by, and
carried by the helicopter borne unit to the objec-
tive area. The basic load is considered an organic
supply to the helicopterborne unit.
Combat Service Support Buildup
Movement of the helic opterborne unit’s basic
load to the objective ar ea and resupply of the
basic load to maintain the specified supply level
are not considered a CSS buildup. A CSS buildup
occurs when supplies above and beyond the basic
load are moved to the ob jective area. For exam-
ple, if a supply safety level of one or two DOS/
DOA is to be moved to the objective area, this
constitutes a CSS buildup. When a CSS buildup
in an LZ commences, the control of the LZ tran-
sitions from the helicopter borne unit HST to the
designated CSS unit and th e LZ is redesignated a
landing zone support area.
SECTION III. EXECUTION 
OF COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT
The helicopterborne force is normally configured
to conduct the initial assa ult with 1 to 3 days of
accompanying supplies (basic load) to ensure
some degree of self-sustainment. When the
enemy situation permits, resupply is accom-
plished by air on a routine basis to keep the basic
load at the prescribed level.
CSS Trains
CSS trains for all helico pterborne units must be
organized, located, and controlled to facilitate the
consolidation, packaging, and air movement of
the basic load into su pport packages configured

--- Page 68 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 7-7 
to unit size. Generally, the air movement of the
battalion’s logistical train requires the same num-
ber of helicopters needed to move a rifle com-
pany. CSS trains that support a helicopterborne
unit work in close coor dination with the HST of
that same helicopterborne  unit, but the HST and
CSS trains are usually separate organizations.
Command and support relationships can be estab-
lished between the two organizations, but since
the HST is a temporary organization and CSS
trains are a permanent organization, keeping the
two separate promotes operational effectiveness.
Certain functions in the LZ, such as distribution
of ammunition and other supplies, are initially
accomplished by the HST and will be assumed by
CSS trains. Thus, supply personnel organic to the
helicopterborne units that  were initially assigned
to the HST will transfer to the CSS trains when
the HST is disbanded.
The organization of CSS trains varies and is
based on the helicopter borne unit’s mission. CSS
trains may be centralized  in one location (unit
trains), or they  may be echelone d in two or more
locations (echeloned trains). In a helicopterborne
operation, CSS trains normally transition between
unit trains and echeloned trains.
Prior to the commencement and during the initial
stages of a helicopterbor ne operation, unit CSS
trains are employed in th e vicinity of the PZ to
prepare equipment and supplies for helicopter lift
and to move items to the PZ. The HST takes over
responsibility for final preparation and any fur-
ther movement. The HST is  also responsible for
the initial distribution of  supplies at LZs in the
objective area.
As elements of the he licopterborne unit in the
objective area move away from the LZ, elements
of the CSS trains are echeloned into the objective
area. This forward echelon assumes responsibility
for receiving critical s upplies contained in the
unit’s basic load from the HST and moving them
to the elements of the helicopterborne unit that
have moved away from the LZ. This echelon also
provides maintenance co ntact teams and medical
support in the objective area. CSS trains remain
echeloned until such ti me that a CSS buildup
commences, a CSSD fr om the MAGTF’s CSSE
assumes responsibility for operation of the LZ, or
the HST is disbanded.  If a CSS buildup com-
mences, the responsibilit y for moving supplies to
and issuing supplies from the landing zone falls
on the MAGTF CSSE. The entire CSS train in
support of the helicopterborne operation can be
moved to the objective area  where it will form a
unit train. As operations co ntinue in the objective
area, the commander may elect to echelon the
CSS trains if CSS must be collocated with maneu-
ver units to provide immediate, dedicated support.
Supply
During the execution of C SS in support of a heli-
copterborne operation, the following supply
issues should be considered:
z Frequent (as opposed to a few massive) replen-
ishment of the ground and air elements. To
meet this requirement, it is necessary to have a
comprehensive logistical plan.
z Supplies going forward fr om logistical trains
must be staged and moved using methods that
reduce loading and unlo ading times. Palletized
or external sling loads reduce ground time and
aircraft vulnerability  because they can be
unloaded quickly.
z Available equipment and personnel capabilities
and the anticipated load configurations must be
considered when task-organizing the HST.  
z The logistic plan must  maintain a balance in
the allocation of res ources between the GCE
and the ACE. This is particularly significant if
FARPs are employed.
z The ability to resupply via surface methods
whenever air movement is  not essential to the
achievement of the operational aim or if resup-
ply by air is limited due  to allocation, the
enemy, or the weather. Th is is particularly sig-
nificant if FARPs are employed.

--- Page 69 ---
7-8 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
Maintenance
Maintenance involv es inspecting, te sting, servic-
ing, repairing, requisitioning, rebuilding, recover-
ing, and evacuating equi pment. Maintenance
personnel do not normally accompany the assault
echelon. During helicopterborne operations,
repair above the operator level is accomplished in
one of two ways:
z Contact teams organic to the helicopterborne
unit or maintenance support teams from the
supporting CSSD may be flown forward to
effect immediate repair of critical equipment.
z Deadlined and/or dama ged equipment may be
evacuated by air.
Field and Personnel Support Services
Field and personnel sup port services, such as
messing and billeting, are an important part of the
overall support effort and continue during helicop-
terborne assault operat ions; however, these ser-
vices are seldom a part of a helicopterborne
assault operation. Rather, they are normally
accomplished in a rear area outside the helicopter-
borne objective area. 
Medical Support
The medical officer and the medical section of
the helicopterborne unit  provide medical sup-
port. To adequately support the mission, the med-
ical officer and the chief assistant should be
included in all operationa l and/or tactical brief-
ings. Medical support is planned and addressed in
the OPORD’s administrativ e and logistic annex.
Medical planning should include—
z Location of unit aid station in objective area.
z Ground and air evacuation plans/routes.
z Location of CSSE medical facilities.
z Location of designated casualty receiving ships
or stations.
z Procedures to request helicopter casualty evacu-
ation (including communications instructions).
Casualty Evacuation
The primary means for casu alty evacuation is the
helicopter. Helicopters leaving the LZ and return-
ing to the rear area can be used to evacuate casu-
alties. In-flight medical ca re is essential for those
casualties whose condition is serious and must be
addressed during planning . If sufficient helicop-
ters are available, one or more helicopters may be
designated as casu alty evacuation helicopters for
the more serious casualti es who require in-flight
medical treatment. The ACE normally provides
in-flight medical treatment personnel. If required,
augmentation can be requested from the combat
support element. All casualties evacuated by heli-
copter are delivered to CSSE medical treatment
facilities or designated ca sualty receiving ships if
available. It is important  to note that medical
evacuation aircraft must be designated and prop-
erly marked to receive pr otections defined by the
Geneva Conventions. The Marine Corps does not
possess medical evacua tion aircraft. Marine
Corps aircraft perform a casualty evacuation mis-
sion using available combat ant aircraft to evacu-
ate casualties.
Helicopter Casualty Evacuation 
Control and Coordination Procedures
Procedures related to casualty evacuation are con-
tained in the OPORD’s air and medical services
annexes. The medical services annex contains the
medical criteria for requesting a helicopter evacu-
ation. The air annex cont ains aviation-related
requirements such as communications channels to
request and the procedures  used to control the
helicopter once it enters the unit area of responsi-
bility. Normally a unit es tablishes an SOP that
contains both the medical and aviation aspects of
helicopter casualty evacuation and the SOP is ref-
erenced in both annexes.

--- Page 70 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 7-9 
The helicopterborne unit establishes its unit and
station near the LZ as soon as possible. During
the initial stages of the operation, when maneuver
units are in close proximit y to the LZ, all casual-
ties are moved to the unit aid station where minor
wounds are treated and personnel return to duty if
possible. The more seriously wounded are moved
to the LZ where the HST evacuates them by the
next available helicopter  returning to the rear.
Those casualties requiring in-flight medical atten-
tion are held at the aid station until a helicopter
with medical personnel is inbound to the LZ. As
maneuver units move fu rther away from the LZ,
it may become necessary to evacuate the more
seriously wounded direct ly from the maneuver
unit if it is possible to land a helicopter near that
unit or to hoist the casualty into the helicopter if
it cannot land.
The helicopterborne unit, when necessary,
requests helicopter casual ty evacuation from the
DASC using the tactical  air request (TAR) net.
The request is normally initiated at a battalion
FSCC once a request from  the battalion aid sta-
tion or a subordinate unit is received. A subordi-
nate unit that is accompanied by a FAC may
make a request over the TA R net directly to the
DASC. The battalion FSCC, who is monitoring
the TAR net, may disa pprove the request by
interrupting the transmis sion and voicing disap-
proval. Otherwise, silence is consent.
The DASC may divert an airborne helicopter, if
available, to perform th e casualty evacuation. If
this is not possi ble, the DASC passes the request
to the ACE’s tactical ai r command center, which
exercises launch authority. The helicopter, once
airborne, receives instru ctions from the DASC
concerning the casualty, location of pickup, flight
routes, who to contact, what radio frequency to
use, and the medical facility to which the casualty
will be evacuated. DASC  coordination with the
GCE FSCC establishes a safe route through
friendly fires for the helicopter.
The helicopter, when appr oaching the area where
the helicopterborne unit is  operating, contacts the
FSCC of the requesting unit and receives final
instruction. If the casua lty pickup is made at a
forward unit, the FSCC instructs the helicopter as
to the radio frequency on  which to contact that
unit and informs the unit of the time of the heli-
copter’s arrival. The fo rward unit contacts the
helicopter by radio and provides terminal guid-
ance instructions and in formation on the friendly
and enemy tactical situation.
When time permits, identif ication of the casualty
is reported to the battali on S-1 over the battalion
administrative and logistical net.
SECTION IV. EXTERNAL LOAD OPERATIONS
Planning and executing external load operations
that do not require a CSS buildup are the responsi-
bility of the HUC, even when the HST is provided
by the landing support ba ttalion. Transporting
supplies and ready for use equipment by helicop-
ter external load (i.e., sling) has the advantage of
rapidly moving heavy, outsized, or urgently
needed items directly to the using unit. 
The logistical planner can enhance the sustain-
ment of the helicopterborne force by developing
SOPs for sling load operations. Detailed informa-
tion on the rigging of eq uipment and supplies for
external lift by helicopt er can be found in MCRP
4-11.3E, Multiservice Helicopter Sling Load, vol-
umes I, II, and III.
External Load Considerations
External load considerations are as follows:
z If cargo is too light or  bulky, it will not fly
properly when suspended under the helicopter
at cruise airspeeds.

--- Page 71 ---
7-10 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
z The external load must not exceed a helicop-
ter’s lift (under given atmospheric conditions)
or hook capabilities. Fo r general planning pur-
poses, the following guidelines are provided:
„ CH-46 4,000 pounds.
„ CH-53D 10,000 pounds.
„ CH-53E 30,000 pounds.
„ UH-1 2,000 pounds. 
Note
As outside air temperature and/or altitude 
increases the payload capacity of a helicop-
ter decreases.
z Airspeeds may be slower when helicopters
carry external loads.
z Dust, sand, or snow, wh ich would be blown
during hover for pickup or delivery of cargo,
may preclude safe external load operations.
z Higher altitudes, whic h may be flown with
sling loads, may subjec t the aircraft to more
ground fire.
z External hovering to pick up or deliver a sling
load during darkness is  inherently more dan-
gerous than similar daylight operations.
z The availability of suitable sling, cargo nets,
cargo bags, and other air delivery items may
preclude or limit external load operations.
Elements of an External Lift Mission
There are normally thr ee different elements
involved in an external lift mission: the PZ HST,
the LZ HST, and the aviation unit.
The PZ HST is responsible for—
z Preparing and controlling the PZ.
z Repositioning all the equipment needed for
external lift operations , including sling, A-22
bags, cargo nets, and containers.
z Storing, inspecting, and maintaining all exter-
nal lift equipment.
z Providing a sufficient number of trained HST
crews for rigging and in specting all the loads,
guiding the helicopters, hooking up the loads,
and clearing the aircraft for departure.
z Securing and protecting sensitive items of sup-
ply and equipment.
z Providing load derigging and disposition
instructions to the receiving unit.
z Providing disposition instructions to the receiv-
ing and aviation units for slings, A-22 bags,
cargo nets, and containers.
The LZ HST is responsible for—
z Preparing and controlling the LZ.
z Providing trained HSTs to  guide the aircraft in
and de-rig the load.
z Coordinating with the PZ HST for the control
and return of the slings, A-22 bags, or any
other items that belong to the supported unit as
soon as possible.
z Preparing, coordinating, and inspecting back-
loads (e.g., slings, A-22 bags) and having them
ready for hookup or loading.
The aviation unit is responsible for—
z Effecting and/or establishing coordination with
the helicopterborne unit.
z Advising the helicopter borne unit on the limi-
tations of the size and weight of the loads that
may be rigged.
z Advising the helicopter borne unit on the suit-
ability of the selected PZs/LZs.
z Providing assistance for the recovery and
return to the PZ of the slings, A-22 bags, cargo
nets, and containers as required by the sup-
ported unit.
z Establishing safety proc edures that ensure uni-
formity and understanding of duties and
responsibilities betwee n the ground crew and
the flight crew.

--- Page 72 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________ 7-11 
SECTION V. AVIATION SUPPORT CONSIDERATIONS
Aviation units consume large amounts of fuel,
ammunition, class IX su pplies, and maintenance
support during intensive helicopterborne opera-
tions. Although aviation units are responsible for
meeting their own unique  logistical support
requirements, the MAGTF planner must be aware
of the requirements, plan for them, and be pre-
pared to assist as necessary.
Forward Arming and Refueling Points
FARPs are temporary fac ilities. They are orga-
nized, equipped, and de ployed by the ACE com-
mander. FARPs are positione d in or closer to the
area of operations than  the aviation unit’s com-
bat service area. The FA RP permits combat air-
craft to rapidly refuel and rearm simultaneously.
FARPs are—
z Established in the vicinity of the supported
ground unit. Whenever possible, these will be
established behind the FEBA/FLOT, and out of
range of the majority of enemy artillery units.
z Hasty and mobile FARPs are often established
forward of the FEBA/FLO T. Because of their
short duration and mobile  nature, they are less
likely to be targets of enemy artillery and attack.
z Positioned to reduce turnaround time, thus
optimizing helicopter availability.
z Repositioned frequently to avoid detection and
destruction.
z Fully mobile, using ground vehicles and helicopters.
z Capable of performing refueling and re-arm-
ing operations rapidly and efficiently.
z Defended from enemy ground and air attack.
z Concealed from observation.
Aircraft Maintenance
Aircraft have substantial maintenance require-
ments. However, maintena nce is kept to a mini-
mum in the operational area. A method used to
accomplish this and still have responsive mainte-
nance is to move avia tion maintenance teams to
the aircraft requiring repa ir when the repair is
beyond the capability of the aircraft crew. The
ACE commander may assi gn aircraft mainte-
nance teams to accompany the flight or position
them in PZs and LZs.
Tactical Recovery of Aircraft and Personnel
If an aircraft is forced to land on enemy terrain
due to mechanical proble ms or combat damage,
every effort is made to protect the aircraft and
personnel until they can be evacuated. However,
mission execution has priority over rescue and
recovery operations. The ACE commander is
notified immediately of any downed aircraft. He
takes action in accordance with unit SOPs to
secure and recover pers onnel and aircraft with
resources or requests assistance from the
MAGTF commander. The helicopterborne unit or
other MAGTF unit may have  to provide security
for recovery teams. 
When an aircraft is downed, the senior occu-
pant assumes comman d and establishes a
defense of the area or organizes evasive action.
If an aircraft is abandoned, steps are taken to
destroy it to preclude its capture or the capture
of sensitive equipment or documents. The level
of authority required to destroy the aircraft is
established in unit SOPs (it may be covered in
the OPORD). However, if capture is immi-
nent, the aircraft, eq uipment, or documents
should be destroyed.

--- Page 73 ---
CHAPTER 8
CONDUCT OF A HELICOPTERBORNE OPERATION
This chapter addresses the HTF’s movement
from the assembly area to the PZ and on to the
LZ. The helicopterborne operation, during subse-
quent operations ashore, normally begins at an
assembly area. If subsequent lifts are required in
the same operation, the procedures described in
this chapter are repeated. Planning starts from the
assembly area and progre sses through the final
objective. If any extraction is required, LZ(s) in
the vicinity of the obj ective area are determined
during the initial planning phase.
Note
This discussion is not all-inclusive, certain 
actions may be omitted or added as required 
by operational demands.
Movement From the Assembly 
Area to the Landing Zone
At the prescribed time, units move from the
assembly area to the hold ing area via a route des-
ignated by the HUC. A holding area must be—
z Covered and concealed.
z Sufficient size for the helicopterborne force.
z Close to primary and alternate PZs.
Each unit commander notifies the PZCO upon his
unit’s arrival in the ho lding area. In the holding
area, unit leaders separate the unit into loads
(sticks) according to the loading plan. Heavy loads
and external lo ads should not be programmed in
initial waves. Offloading heavy internal loads is
time-consuming and slows troop buildup. 
Each load (stick) includ es a designated helicop-
ter team leader. The he licopter team leader is
usually the senior Marine on the helicopter team
and is responsible for briefing his troops and
inspecting the load. The helicopter team leader
ensures that the load is organized and ready to be
loaded as planned. Upon arrival at the holding
area, the PZ control party briefing includes the
loading point for primar y and alternate PZs and
the routes to those poi nts. At a minimum, the
helicopter team leader br iefs his heli copter team
members on the following information:
z Loading procedures.
z Bump plan (individual/load bumps).
z Safety belt usage.
z Preflight safety inspection of Marines.
z In-flight procedures.
z Downed aircraft procedures.
z Offloading procedures.
z Movement from the LZ.
Procedures in the Pickup Zone
Organization of the Pickup Zone
To the maximum extent possible, the PZCO lays
out the PZ as directed in the plan.
To minimize confusion dur ing landing, aviation
elements arrive at th e PZ in the formation
directed in the plan. Then, the PZCO, or HST
personnel, assists in load ing by ensuring helicop-
ters and personnel are in  the proper location and
formation at the correct time. If an aircraft
(scheduled for the lift) is  unable to complete its
mission due to mechanical failure, the PZCO
informs the unit commander, who implements the
bump plan.

--- Page 74 ---
8-2 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
Infantry Movement to the Pickup Zone
The PZCO coordinates the arrival of both air-
craft and troops so that the troops arrive at their
respective loading point just before the helicop-
ters land. This prevents  congestion, facilitates
security, and reduces vulnerability to enemy
actions during PZ operations.
On the PZCO’s signal, loads (sticks) move by
designated routes from their holding area to their
loading points in the PZ. The PZCO may use
schedules, messengers, hand-and-arm signals,
light signals, or (as a last resort) radio to order
loads to move to the PZ.
Helicopter Movement to the Pickup Zone
Helicopters begin movement to arrive in the PZ
at the scheduled time an d should use terrain fly-
ing techniques en rout e to the PZ. The PZCO
contacts the aviation unit if there is a PZ change.
If there has been a change  in allowable lift/load,
number of aircraft, or the landing formation, the
AFL must contact the PZCO.
During air movement to the PZ, enemy antiair-
craft or other fire may be encountered. Therefore,
air reconnaissance may be used to locate and sup-
press enemy positions prio r to the arrival of the
helicopterborne as sault aircraft. Attack helicop-
ters will not normally land in the PZ. When
assault helicopters are to  be on the ground for
extended periods, attack helicopters may occupy
holding areas nearby or return to FARP sites. The
C2 helicopter is posi tioned where the command
group can see and control critical events.
Strict radio discipline is maintained throughout
the operation; radio sile nce should not be broken
unless absolutely  necessary. Radio calls between
aircraft are permitted only as a last resort when
other signals are not appr opriate. Use of covered
frequency-agile nets furt her reduces the require-
ment for radio silence. 
Lift-off From the Pickup Zone
When the assault aircraft are loaded and ready for
lift-off, the PZCO signals the flight leader using
hand-and-arm or light si gnals. The AFL may sig-
nal other aircraft by turn ing his navigation lights
on (or off). Members of the PZ control group
may also relay the alert to lift-off to aircraft in the
rear of the formation or the flight leader may lift-
off and the others follow.
Lift-off should be at the time prescribed in the
plan. However, aircraft wi ll not loiter in the PZ.
If they are ready early, they lift-off and alter
speed so as to arrive at designated locations at the
appropriate times. This sh ould place the first air-
craft of the first lift in the LZ at L-hour.
Lift-off may be by singl e aircraft or by wave.
Under some conditions (e.g ., dusty PZ, restricted
PZ, or high density a ltitude and no wind), it is
best to break waves into smaller increments. If LZ
insert is executed in a single wave, then simulta-
neous lift-off is preferred because—
z It is easier for the EFL to plan the scheme of
maneuver and provide security en route for air-
craft depending on numb er of escort aircraft
available.
z Operational control is easier.
z It reduces the enemy’s tim e to fire at the air-
craft.
z The AFL adjusts the flight’s speed and rate of
climb so all elements form into the en route
flight formation at the required altitude.
En route to the Landing Zone
The AMC predetermines the en route flight
speed. The AFL paces the flight to ensure the
flight crosses the line of departure on time.

--- Page 75 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 8-3 
Communications security  is paramount unless
using covered nets. However, if directed in the
order, flight leaders re port to the AMC and mis-
sion commander as they pass each checkpoint,
especially when checkpoint s are tied to triggers
such as fires. Checkpoi nt information must be
passed to the helicopter team leader. 
Ground commanders, helicopter team leaders,
and aircraft crewmembers must remain oriented
throughout the flight. To  remain oriented, they
use the aircraft’s inte rnal communications sys-
tem, which receives information updates from the
aircrew, and they follo w and verify the flight
route using terrain observation, maps, aircraft
compass, and aircraft speed.
When a threat is enc ountered along the flight
route, which prohibits th e helicopterborne force
from using that route, the AFL gives the order for
the AMC or mission commander to modify or
switch to alternate flig ht routes. This authority
may be delegated to the AFL. If the LZ needs to
be changed, the HUC ma kes the decision and
informs the AMC or mi ssion commander. The
AMC and AFL may also be given authority to
change the LZ based on the enemy threat or haz-
ardous environmental conditions.
Security
Attack helicopters provide  security for downed
aircraft, route reconnaissance, and other assis-
tance en route as directed by the ACE com-
mander. The ACE comma nder develops the plan
for TRAP.
Fixed-wing aircraft may work with attack heli-
copters to provide security to the flank, front, and
rear of the helicopter formation(s). When per-
forming this role in a medium to high threat envi-
ronment, speciall y-equipped aircra ft suppress or
destroy SAM sites and radar-directed guns. Other
fixed-wing aircraft may be  used to selectively
jam enemy radar and communications signals
using jamming transmitters or other methods.
When available, indirect  fire weapons provide
suppressive fires along the flight routes as
planned or as necessary.
Landing Operations
Attack helicopters can be employed in various
roles during landing operations. They may—
z Precede the assault element into the LZ for
reconnaissance and/or provide suppressive
fires to prevent a time gap in LZ fires (pro-
vided by other support elements). The EFL
also determines if the criteria that will permit
successful insertion of  the GCE exists. This
assessment is based on de struction criteria of
threat forces established during planning.
z Recommend last minute changes regarding air-
craft landing instructions.
z Provide area cover, neutralize known enemy
positions, or provide security for assault air-
craft while in the LZ area.
z Observe ground approaches to the LZ for pos-
sible enemy attacks.
Command and Control Helicopter
The C2 helicopter is po sitioned where it can best
observe and communicate with the forward ele-
ments. The HUC determines where he can best
influence the action by either remaining in the C2
aircraft or by joining forces on the ground. 
Landing Zone Preparatory Fires
Preparatory fires are planned for all primary and
alternate LZs. The decision  to initiate LZ prepa-
ratory fires is made by the mission commander.
The mission commande r can delegated this
authority to the AMC, EFL, HUC, FSC, or opera-
tions officer. The FSC s hould travel with the
ground commander to expedi te fires and changes

--- Page 76 ---
8-4 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
to preplanned fires. To the maximum extent pos-
sible, fires are planned al ong all routes leading to
the LZ. Planned fires should be intense and
should shift or lift shortly before the first ele-
ments land. In the deve lopment and sequencing
of fires, the following are considered:
z Deception fires, while not fired on the objec-
tive area, should still be fired against targets of
some tactical value; however, economy of
force must be considered.
z Preparations of a long duration may reduce the
possibility of surprise.
z The FSC considers the avai lability of fire sup-
port assets and coordinates their use with artil-
lery units. Preparations  by fixed-wing aircraft
are requested through the FAC(A).
z A known or suspected enemy force located in
the vicinity of the LZ, regardless of size, war-
rants LZ preparation if the LZ is to be used.
The GO/NO GO, LZ cold, and destruction cri-
teria should be established based on the threat.
z Various types of ordnan ce used in preparation
fires can cause obstacles to landing and maneu-
ver (e.g., craters, tree blow-down, fires, smoke,
poor visibility) on and near the LZ.
z Fire support coordination measures must be
established for lifting or shifting fires; e.g.,
restrictive fire line or restrictive fire area.
z Resupply ammunition limitations.
Because CAS on-station time is limited by fuel
and enemy air defenses, the sequencing of sup-
porting fires is carefull y controlled by the FSC to
obtain maximum, continu ous support. To ensure
that all fire support assets are utilized at the cor-
rect time, the FSC is collocated with the DASC
and must be constantly in formed as to the status
of the flight. This allows fires to coincide with
the actual arrival of landing helicopters at the LZ. 
Another method of contin uing fire support is to
shift indirect fires to one flank, conduct a simul-
taneous air strike on another flank, and use attack
helicopters to orient on the approach and retire-
ment lanes. This technique requires precise tim-
ing and helicopter formation navigation to avoid
flight paths of other airc raft and gun-target lines
of indirect fire weapons.
Landing Techniques
The helicopterborne force should land as planned
unless last minute changes in the tactical situation
force the commander to abort or alter the landing.
The aircrew must make ev ery effort to keep the
troops in their aircraft in formed of the situation,
especially of any changes to the original plan.
A simultaneous or near  simultaneous landing is
desired so as to plac e the maximum number of
troops on the ground, in a given area, in the short-
est possible time. Individual aircraft landing
points are planned to disembark troops as close as
possible to their initial positions. If ground move-
ment times are a factor, staggered waves or land-
ing by element are used to reduce LZ size and the
time required for ground movement.
In most operations, if th e situation permits, the
operation is accomplished with a minimum num-
ber of lifts, each with the maximum number of
aircraft that the LZ will accommodate. This
reduces the exposure time of the aircraft, main-
tains unit integrity, provides maximum combat
power, and gives the enemy less time to react.
When separate element landings are dictated
because of LZ si ze, time intervals between ele-
ments are kept as short as possible. Detailed plan-
ning determines the minimum time needed
between waves of assault aircraft, facilitates the
safe insertion of forces, and facilitates the ground
scheme of maneuver.
Troops are most vulnerab le during landing; they
disembark rapidly an d deploy to carry out
assigned missions. Therefore, planning must
maximize suppressive fire s provided by assault
door guns during disembarkation.
Casualty evacuation locations are normally desig-
nated at the approach end of the LZ. This permits
continuation of the lift and prompt evacuation of
the wounded.

--- Page 77 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 8-5 
At the LZ, leaders at a ll levels account for per-
sonnel and equipment a nd submit appropriate
reports to higher head quarters. Key personnel
killed, wounded, or missi ng are replaced accord-
ing to unit SOP. Essential weapons missing or
out of action may require the force to reorganize.
After the unit completes its consolidation of the
LZ, it reorganizes as nece ssary to carry out the
ground tactical plan. 
Completion of the Landing Zone Operation
When the LZ operation is finished, aviation
assets return by preselec ted routes to complete
subsequent lifts, con duct other op erations, or
refuel and remain in support of ground forces
(e.g., casualty evacuation, immediate re-embarka-
tion, emergency extract, resupply, TRAP).
Commanders’ Responsibilities/
Sequence of Actions
Helicopterborne Mission Commander 
or Helicopterborne Unit Commander 
The helicopterborne mission commander or HUC
takes the following actions:
z Receives warning order (see app. I).
z Conducts mission analysis.
z Receives initial information from the AMC.
z Gives warning order to staff and subordinates.
z Receives personnel status report from S-1.
z Receives equipment status report from S-4.
z Receives enemy situation briefing from S-2.
z Receives friendly forces  information briefing
from S-3.
z Continues analysis of METT-T.
z Receives higher headquarters’ OPORD.
z Begins development of commander’s estimate.
z Provides guidance to staff as needed.
z Receives staff estimates.
z Obtains data from staff as needed.
z Announces concept.
z Supervises development of OPORD.
z Receives air movement information.
z Coordinates air movement matters with AMC.
z Receives air loading plan from S-3.
z Receives copy of OPORD from S-3.
z Approves or modifies and approves OPORD.
z Issues or oversees issuance of OPORD.
z Conducts/oversees conducting of OPORD brief.
Air Mission Commander
The AMC takes the following actions:
z Receives warning order.
z Conducts mission analysis:
„ Receives aircrew status report from ACE S-3.
„ Receives aircraft availability report from
ACE aircraft maintenance officer.
„ Receives enemy situat ional brief from ACE
S-2.
z Gives initial planning in formation to GCE and
staff.
z Receives GCE warning order.
z Receives friendly force information briefing
from S-3.
z Provides technical advi ce to GCE executive
officer (XO) and S-2 for PZ/LZ identification.
z Coordinates with supported unit staff.
z Provides information to aviation unit on
ground operation.
z Provides advice to GCE S-3 on PZ selection.
z Assists XO in PZ control plan.
z Provides GCE air officer with flight route com-
putations.
z Provides advice to GC E S-3 on LZ and flight
route selection.
z Coordinates PZs/LZs, flight routes, and aircraft
allocation from GCE air officer and HUC.
z Obtains PZ control plan from GCE XO
(PZCO).
z Aids GCE S-4 in selecting logistic PZ(s).
z Coordinates aircraft in ternal and sling equip-
ment loads with GCE S-4.

--- Page 78 ---
8-6 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
z Obtains HWSAT from GCE S-3 and develops
the HEALT in accordan ce with the S-3 and
HUC.
z Briefs aviation unit on operation.
z Inspects PZ(s) with GCE XO.
z Receives GCE OPORD.
Helicopterborne Force Executive Officer
The following actions are taken by the helicopter-
borne force XO:
z Receives warning order.
z Receives personnel status report from S-1.
z Receives equipment status report from S-3.
z Receives enemy situation report from S-2.
z Receives AMC initial information.
z Receives friendly forces information from S-3.
z Determines available PZs. Obtains advice from
AMC.
z Submits PZs to S-3.
z Coordinates staff planning.
z Obtains PZ from S-3.
z Develops PZ control plan.
z Coordinates PZ operati ons with AMC/termi-
nal controller(s).
z Receives GCE commander’s concept.
z Obtains PZs, LZs, fli ght routes, and aircraft
allocation from S-3.
z Coordinates PZ operations with S-1. Com-
pletes bump and straggler control plan.
z Inspects PZs with PZCO(s).
z Obtains air movement plan from S-3.
z Obtains air loading plan from S-3.
z Obtains sequence of bump from subordinate
units. Annotates air movement plan with
sequence of bump.
z Completes PZ control plan. Submits to S-3.
z Inspects PZs with mission commander.
z Receives OPORD.
Helicopterborne Force S-1
The following actions ar e performed by the heli-
copterborne force S-1:
z Receives operation notification.
z Assembles personnel data.
z Receives helicopterborne warning order.
z Reports personnel status to commander and
staff.
z Receives mission commander’s initial informa-
tion.
z Receives friendly forces information briefing
from S-3.
z Begins mission analysis from personnel stand-
point.
z Begins preparation of staff estimate (personnel).
z Receives commander’s concept.
z Coordinates PZ operations  with battalion XO.
Develops straggler control plan.
z Briefs subordinate uni t personnel on straggler
control plan.
z Receives command post’s general location
from S-3.
z Coordinates POW and ci vilian control plan
with S-2.
z Completes POW and civ ilian control plan.
Coordinates with S-4.
z Completes S-1 portion of paragraph 4,
OPORD. Gives to S-4.
z Receives air loading plan from S-3.
z Coordinates with hea dquarters commandant.
Develops plan for command post displace-
ment and security.
z Coordinates command post displacement plan
with S-3.
z Coordinates with S-2 for interpreter support, if
applicable.

--- Page 79 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 8-7 
z Coordinates casualty evacuation plan with S-4,
surgeon, and AFL.
z Plans for recovery and evacuation of the dead.
Coordinates with S-3 and S-4.
z Develops personnel replacement plan, if appli-
cable.
z Completes Annex E (Personnel) of the
OPORD.
z Receives OPORD.
Helicopterborne Force S-2
The helicopterborne force S-2 takes the following
actions:
z Receives operation notification.
z Receives command dire ction regarding mis-
sion, area of operations.
z Coordinates any needed map requests through
S-4.
z Assembles available intelligence data.
z Requests weather forecast.
z Distributes maps.
z Provides initial intelligence orientation and
brief to commander, staff, and subordinate unit
commanders on enemy situations.
z Obtains advice concerning LZs from AMC.
z Determines available LZs.
z Submits LZ list to S-3.
z Analyzes weather forecasts.
z Obtains advice concerni ng flight routes from
air officer and AMC.
z Develops threat data information for proposed
flight routes and provi des data to AMC and
HUC.
z Provides threat estima te along with available
flight routes to S-3 (air officer).
z Develops escape and recovery plans; coordi-
nates with ACE S-2.
z Recommends priority intelligence require-
ments and information requirements.
z Develops intelligence collection plan with
ACE and briefs S-3 on plan.
z Tasks available collection assets and recom-
mends employment of reconnaissance assets to
the S-3.
z Submits requests for intelligence to higher
authority.
z Requests aviation reconnaissance and/or imag-
ery of routes, LZ(s), and objectives.
z Begins preparation of staff intelligence estimate.
z Processes intelligence data gathered.
z Prepares intelligence products.
z Develops intelligence debrief plan.
z Completes staff estimate (intelligence).
z Provides S-3 with staff estimate (intelligence).
z Continues intelligence cycle and provides reg-
ular briefings to commanders and staffs.
z Recommends targets to FSC and S-3.
z Completes paragraph 1b2 (Area of Interest), 1c
(Enemy Forces), and Annex B (Intelligence) of
OPORD and submits to S-3.
z Continues intelligence cycle and provides reg-
ular briefings to commanders and staffs.
z Coordinates with S-1 fo r interpreter support, if
applicable.
z Coordinates development of POW and civilian
control plan with S-1.
z Develops debrief plan.
z Updates intelligence map as needed.
Helicopterborne Force GCE S-3
The helicopterborne force GCE S-3 takes the fol-
lowing actions:
z Receives warning order.
z Assembles data on friendly elements.
z Receives mission comman der initial informa-
tion through the air officer.
z Receives personnel status from S-1.
z Receives equipment status from S-4.
z Receives enemy situation from S-2.
z Briefs mission commander’s initial information.
z Briefs friendly forces disposition and location.
z Begins development of course of action.
z Receives brief by S-2 on collection plan.
z Receives list of availa ble LZs from S-2 and
available PZs from XO.
z Receives higher headquarters’ OPORD.

--- Page 80 ---
8-8 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
z Begins preparation of staff estimates for opera-
tions.
z Selects PZs. Briefs XO  and air officer on PZ
selection.
z Obtains available flight routes from mission
commander through air officer.
z Consolidates staff information.
z Recommends LZs and flight routes.
z Determines need for indirect fire preparations.
z Determines need for EW support.
z Provides staff estimate s of supportability to
commander.
z Receives commander’s decision.
z Begins preparation of OPORD.
z Provides XO and air officer with PZs and air-
craft allocation. Select s general location for
command post. Provides information to staff.
z Receives S-2 input to OPORD. Receives
administrative-logistical  portion of  order from
the S-4.
z Completes OPORD paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 5
and Annex C (Operations). Supervises comple-
tion of pertinent annexes and assembles com-
pleted OPORD.
z Receives air movement plan from air officer.
z Receives fire plan from FSC.
z Receives EW support pl an from communica-
tions officer.
z Obtains air loading plan from air officer.
z Receives paragraph 4 of the OPORD from S-4.
z Completes paragraph 5 of the OPORD.
z Completes operation overlay.
z Coordinates command post displacement with
headquarters commandant.
z Obtains PZ control plan from XO.
z Complete OPORD with annexes. Submits to
commander for approval.
z Receives OPORD from the commander.
z Issues OPORD, when directed by the com-
mander.
Helicopterborne Force GCE Air Officer
The helicopterborne force GCE air officer takes
the following actions:
z Receives operation notification.
z Receives helicopterborne warning order.
z Receives personnel status from S-1.
z Receives equipment status from S-4.
z Receives enemy situation briefing from S-2.
z Receives mission commander’s initial informa-
tion.
z Analyzes mission commander’s initial infor-
mation for available assets.
z Establishes liaison with ACE/AMC.
z Assists S-3 in preparation of air movement plan.
z Recommends air requests to S-3 and processes
air requests from S-3.
z Obtains PZs from S-3 and provides PZs to FSC
and staff as needed.
z Establishes necessary liai son with tactical air
control party and coordinates preplanned fire
support.
z Receives available flight routes from S-2.
z Computes flight route times and distances.
z Provides available flight  route information to
the S-3.
z Receives helicopterborne commander’s concept.
z Obtains LZs, flight rout es, and aircraft alloca-
tion from S-3. Provides data to mission com-
mander, FSC, subordinate unit commanders,
and staff as needed.
z Obtain any additional tactical air requirements
from FSC.
z Initiates requests for ai r support of all types
(e.g., assault support request, joint TARs).
z Obtains logistical PZs from S-4.
z Coordinates air movement plan with HUC and
AMC and submits to S-3 for approval.
z Distributes air movement plan.

--- Page 81 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ 8-9 
z Obtains subordinate air loading plan.
z Consolidates air loading plans and provides to
helicopterborne commander, S-3, XO, and S-1.
z Receives OPORD.
Helicopterborne Force GCE S-4
The helicopterborne force GCE S-4 takes the fol-
lowing actions:
z Receives operation notification.
z Obtains maps requests by S-2.
z Assembles equipment data.
z Receives helicopterborne warning order.
z Receives personnel status from S-1.
z Provides equipment status to the commander
and staff.
z Receives enemy situation briefing from S-2.
z Receives mission commander’s initial informa-
tion.
z Receives friendly forces information from S-3.
z Conducts mission analysis  to determine logis-
tic/sustainment requirements.
z Receives initial supply requirements from sub-
ordinate units.
z Begins preparation of staff estimate (logistics).
z Determines effects of  ammunition supply rate
on operations. Submits ammunition supply rate
to FSC.
z Compiles material us age data for operation.
Obtains PZs from S-3 (air officer).
z Compares usage data to materiel available.
z Requests materiel as needed.
z Coordinates with mission commander and
AMC on establishing FARP.
z Provides S-3 with staff appraisal (logistics).
z Receives helicopterborne commander’s concept.
z Begins development of support plan for opera-
tion. Obtains LZs and flight routes from S-3.
z Selects logistic PZs a nd provides to S-3 (air
officer).
z Plans aircraft loads (internal and external) for
mission support. Coor dinates pickup points
with mission commander and/or S-3 air officer.
z Completes paragraph 4 and Annex D (Logis-
tics/Combat Service Support) of the OPORD.
z Coordinates plans for evacuation of enemy
materiel with S-2.
z Coordinates casualty evacuation plan with S-1,
medical, and AMC.
z Receives OPORD.
Helicopterborne Force 
GCE Fire Support Coordinator
The helicopterborne fo rce GCE FSC takes the
following actions:
z Receives operational notification.
z Begins mission analysis to determine available
and needed means of fire support.
z Plots locations and capabil ities for indirect fire
support systems supporting the force.
z Estimates fire support needed.
z Obtains ammunition supp ly rate from S-4/S-3
of artillery unit, determines effects of ammuni-
tion supply rate on operation, and gathers infor-
mation for development of fire support plan.
z Obtains PZs from S-3.
z Continues to gather in formation for develop-
ment of fire support plan.
z Coordinates fire support requirements with S-3.
z Provides S-3 with available fire support recom-
mendation for indirect fire preparations.
z Obtains LZs and flight routes from S-3.
z Obtains recommended targets from S-2. Devel-
ops air requests to support ground tactical plan.

--- Page 82 ---
8-10 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
z Completes fire support pl an (completes para-
graph 3f[3] [Fire Support Coordinating Mea-
sures],  paragraph 3t [Fire Support], and
Appendix 19 [Fire Suppor t] of Annex C of the
OPORD).
z Submits fire support plan to S-3 for com-
mander’s approval; on approval, distributes.
Note
Subordinate units develop their fire support 
plans. The FSC coordinates and consoli-
dates subordinate unit plans into the heli-
copterborne plan.
z Receives OPORD.
Subordinate Unit Commander
The subordinate unit co mmander takes the fol-
lowing actions:
z Receives operational notification.
z Gathers personnel and equipment data.
z Reports personnel and e quipment to battalion
staff. Receives maps.
z Receives battalion warning order.
z Issues company warning order.
z Determines initial supply requirements.
z Submits initial supply requirements to S-4.
z Begins preparation of air loading plans.
z Continues mission preparation.
z Obtains appropriate PZs,  LZs, flight routes,
and aircraft allocation from S-3.
z Continues mission planning.
z Obtains air movement plan from S-3.
z Completes air loading plan.
z Submits air loading plan to S-3.
z Receives OPORD.
z Analyzes mission.
z Develops fire support plan.
z Develops ground tactical plan.
z Prepares OPORD.
Helicopterborne Force Commander
Planning Sequence
The commander carefully analyzes the tasks and
elements that are require d to accomplish the mis-
sion and maintain unit integrity. The commander
must also consider the fi ve basic plans that com-
prise the helicopterborne force operation. These
plans—the ground tactical  plan, the landing plan,
the air movement plan, th e loading plan, and the
staging plan—are developed concurrently. The
ground tactical plan is driven by the assigned
mission and is, therefore, developed first. Conse-
quently, it forms the basis from which other plans
are derived.
Time Schedule
Planning for the helicopte rborne force operation
requires time—time to plan, time to  prepare, and
time to brief. The planning is as detailed as time
will permit.
The HUC, Commanding Officer, 3d Battalion, 6th Marines, 
receives the Marine expeditionary brigade (MEB) warning 
order at 0900. He determined that his force would be 
ready to land, L-hour, at 0600 the next morning. At 0945, 
he met with his staff and officers at the battalion com-
mand post and issued his warning order. Using the 
reverse planning sequence, the HUC outlined the follow-
ing sequence:
0600 L-hour
0530 1st assault wave departs PZ
0515 En route from assembly area to PZ
0500 Units arrive assembly/staging area
0415 Reveille
2100 Battalion XO’s brief
2000 Status update from battalion staff
1800 Evening meal
1700 Issue OPORD X-9X (JUSTSAYNO)
1600 Receives S-2 intelligence brief
1500 Receives S-4 equipment and logistical brief
1400 Receives S-1 personnel status brief
1300 Receives S-3 brief–Consolidate–S-2 
brief goes first
1200 Noon meal
1100 Complete issuance of warning order
0945 Issue warning order

--- Page 83 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________ 8-11 
Ground Tactical Plan
All planning evolves ar ound the ground tactical
plan. The plan specifies actions in the objective
area that ultimately accomplish the mission.
Landing Plan
The landing plan must support the ground tacti-
cal plan. 
The landing plan sequen ces elements into the
area of operation to ensure that units arrive at the
designated location at the designated time to exe-
cute the ground tactical plan. 
The battalion commander  is faced with three primary 
objectives—
z Primary objective number 1: LZ SNOWBIRD.
z Primary objective number 2: Objective Z, the Ande
Municipal Airport.
z Primary objective number 3:  Link up with the mecha-
nized force.
The battalion commander is determined to keep the oper-
ation as simple as possible. Therefore, he assigned one 
mission to each of his rifle companies.
z Company I (reinforced) would secure Primary Objec-
tive Number 1, LZ SNOWBIRD. Company I would pro-
vide security at the LZ and guidance to all incoming
assets. The company commander would exercise con-
trol over the LZ, provide guides for the incoming units,
and maintain security to preclude paramilitary forces
from disrupting the landing plan. Once Company L
has arrived, Company I woul d become the battalion
reserve.
z Company K (reinforced) wo uld follow Company I into
LZ SNOWBIRD and immediately deploy to seize Objec-
tive Z, the Ande Municipal Airport. Company K would
continue operations until it has secured complete con-
trol of the air facility. This control would be estab-
lished to allow 6th Marine Expeditionary Force (MEF)
and the government of Grande  to operate from the air-
strip and use the buildings.
z Company L (reinforced) wo uld initially act as the
reserve unit. Company L would help the designated
PZCO, Commanding Officer, Headquarters and Service
Company. Company L would provide security for the
PZ and personnel as needed to assist units moving
from the staging/assembly area to the PZ, as well as
help load materiel into aircraft as needed. On order,
Company L would load at th e PZ, land in LZ SNOW-
BIRD, and conduct the linkup operation.
A warning order was given to the battalion staff and com-
pany commanders at the 0945 meeting.
The commander examined the following:
z Helicopter assets were available to enable two rein-
forced companies to be airlifted simultaneously. The
battalion commander decided to lift Company I (rein-
forced) en mass. They would land in LZ SNOWBIRD at
0600 and secure it. Fifteen minutes later, Company K
(reinforced) would land in a single wave.
z Once Company K had departed the LZ, the rest of the
battalion could commence air movement. Initially, the
battalion command post would land with Company K
and set up in the vicinity of LZ SNOWBIRD. On signal,
the battalion command post would establish itself in
the vicinity of the Ande Municipal Airport.
z At the conclusion of land ing operations, Company I
would remain in the areas adjacent LZ SNOWBIRD.
The following considerations were examined and deci-
sions were made.
z Size and location of LZ.
z Anticipated forces in and around the LZ.
z Unit tactical integrity.
z Ensuring all Marines are briefed and oriented.
z Ensuring Company I is su fficiently task-organized
and equipped to destroy th e enemy in the area and
secure the LZ.
z Ensuring the landing plan offers flexibility in the
event circumstances require it.
z Planning supporting fires in and around the LZ.
„ Plan fires for air movement.
„ Plan fires for the landing.
„ Plan fires for subsequent operations.
z Ensuring plans were made  for resupply and casualty
evacuation.

--- Page 84 ---
8-12 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
Air Movement Plan
The air movement plan is based on the ground tac-
tical plan and the landing  plan. It specifies the
schedule and provides in structions for air move-
ment of troops, equipment, and supplies. This plan
is detailed in the HEALT. Furthermore, it provides
coordinating instructions regarding air routes, con-
trol points, speeds, altitu des, and formations. The
planned use of aviation fire support, security, and
linkup operations should be included. 
The air movement plan is prepared jointly by the
GCE and the ACE. The air movement plan con-
tains aircraft allocatio ns; designates the number
and type of aircraft for each wave of the opera-
tion; specifies departure points; identifies routes
to and from the PZ a nd LZ; and identifies the
loading, liftoff, and la nding times. The air move-
ment plan ensures that all required personnel and
materiel are accounted fo r in the movement and
that each aircraft is pr operly loaded, correctly
positioned, and directed to the LZ.
Loading Plan
The loading plan is ba sed on the air movement
plan and detailed in  the HEALT and HWSAT.
Unit integrity is esse ntial, however, personnel
weapons and equipment ma y be spread loaded so
that C2 assets, combat po wer, and an appropriate
weapons mix arrive in the LZ ready for combat. A
bump plan ensures that essential personnel and
equipment are loaded ahea d of less critical loads
in case of aircraft breakdowns or delays. 
Staging Plan
Loads stand by at the PZ  ready for the arrival of
the aircraft. The staging plan restates the PZ
organization, defines routes to the PZ, and pro-
vides instruction for linking up with the aircraft. 
Air movement for this operation were developed by the 
air officer in coordination with the ACE.
Tentative flight routes were selected by the AFL.
The loading plan for 3d Battalion, 6th Marines was con-
tained in the battalion SOP for helicopterborne 
operations. Load plans were carefully coordinated with 
the aviation elements and verified by the embarkation 
officer and the air officer. The loading plan would control 
the movement of troops, supplies, and equipment at the 
PZ; designate unit loading sites; and control the arrival, 
loading, and departure of all aircraft. Third Battalion, 6th 
Marines SOP was detailed, well-planned, and well-
rehearsed. The PZ was selected by the battalion com-
mander and the headquarters commandant was 
designated the PZCO.
The staging plan was based on the loading plan and was 
covered in the battalion SOP for helicopterborne opera-
tions. It prescribed the arrival times of units at the PZ in 
the proper order for movement. 

--- Page 85 ---
APPENDIX A
SMALL-UNIT LEADER’S GUIDE TO
PICKUP ZONE AND LANDING ZONE OPERATIONS
This appendix serves as a small unit (company
and below) leader’s guide  for the safe, efficient,
and tactically sound con duct of operations in and
around PZs and LZs.
Selection and Marking
Small unit leaders should be proficient in select-
ing and marking PZs/LZs and in providing termi-
nal guidance to aircraft. Tactical and technical
considerations that imp act selection of PZs/LZs
are discussed in chapter 4. 
The marking of PZs/LZs is as follows:
z During the day, a ground guide marks the PZ/
LZ for the lead aircraft by holding an M-16A2
over his head, by displaying a folded VS-17
chest panel high, or by other identifiable
means.
z The code letter Y (inverted  Y) is used to mark
the landing point of the le ad aircraft at night
(see fig. A-1). Chemical  light sticks may be
used to maintain light discipline.
z If more than one aircraft is landing in the same
PZ/LZ, there will be an additional light for
each aircraft. For obse rvation, utility, and
attack aircraft, each additional aircraft landing
point is marked with a single light placed at the
exact point that each aircraft is to land. For
cargo aircraft, each addi tional landing point is
marked with two lights and the two lights are
placed 10 meters apart and aligned in the air-
craft direction of flight.
z Obstacles include any obs truction to flight that
might interfere with aircraft operation in the
ground (trees, stumps, rocks) and cannot be
reduced. During daylight, the aircrew is
responsible for avoiding  obstacles on the PZ/
LZ. For night and limite d visibility operations,
all obstacles are marked with red lights. The
following criteria is used in marking obstacles:
„ If the obstacle is on the aircraft approach
route, both the near an d far sides of the ob-
stacle are marked.
„ If the obstacle is on the aircraft departure
route, the near side of the obstacle is marked.
„ If the obstacle protrude s into the PZ or LZ,
but is not on the flight route of the aircraft,
the near side of the obstacle is marked.
„ Large obstacles on the approach route are
marked by encircling the obstacle with red
lights.
Control of Aircraft
Approaching aircraft are controlled by arm-and-
hand signals to transmit  terminal guidance for
landing. The speed of arm movement indicates
the desired speed of airc raft compliance with the
14 m
14 m 7 m
Lef t
St e m
Ri g h t
St e m
0
0
00
B as e Directional
Direction of Flight
Figure A-1. Inverted Y.

--- Page 86 ---
A-2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
signal. The signalman is positioned to the right
front of the aircraft where he can best be seen by
the pilot. Signalmen hold lighted batons or flash-
lights in each hand to gi ve signals at night. If
using flashlights, care must be taken to avoid
blinding the pilot. Bat ons and flashlights will
remain lighted at all times when signaling. 
Assembly and Objective Areas
Prior to arrival of the aircraft, the PZ must be
secured, PZ control party positioned, and the
troops and equipment positioned in the unit
assembly area.
Occupation of Unit Assembly Area
Unit leaders should accomplish the following:
z Maintain all-round security of assembly area.
z Maintain communications.
z Organize troops and equi pment into loads and
lifts in accordance with unit air movement
plan.
z Conduct safety briefi ng and equipment check
of troops.
z Establish priority of loading for each Marine
and identify bump personnel.
z Brief on the location of the straggler control
points.
Movement to the Occupation of Holding Area
Linkup guides from the PZ  control party meet
with designated units in  the unit assembly area
and coordinate movement of loads to a release
point. As loads arrive at  the release point, load
guides move each load to its assigned load
assembly area. (To reduce the number of person-
nel required, the same guide may be used to
move the unit from the un it assembly area to the
load assembly area.) If part of a larger helicopter-
borne assault, no more th an three loads should be
located in the load asse mbly area at one time.
Noise and light discipline will be maintained
throughout the entire movement in order to main-
tain the security of th e PZ. Additionally, no per-
sonnel should be allowed on the PZ unless
loading aircraft, rigging vehicles for sling load, or
directed by PZ control. While remaining in load
order, each Marine is as signed a security (firing)
position by the heliteam commander or load
leader. Each Marine is  employed in the prone
position, weapon at the ready, and facing outward
(away from PZ) to provi de immediate close-in
security. An example of a large, one-sided PZ is
depicted in figure A-2. 
Security
T eam
Security
T eamLarge Open Area
Load
AA Load
AA
Load
AA
Load
AA
Load
AA
Release
Point
Unit
AA Unit
AA
Unit
AA
PZ Control
Woods
Woods
Figure A-2. Example of a Large, 
One-sided Pickup Zone.

--- Page 87 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ A-3 
An example of a small, two-sided PZ with unit
and load assembly areas is depicted in figure A-3.
While in the load assembly area, units should
adhere to the following for loading the aircraft:
z Maintain tactical integrity by keeping fire
teams and squads intact.
z Maintain self-sufficiency by loading a weapon
and its ammunition on the same aircraft.
z Ensure key Marines, weapons, and equipment
are cross-loaded among aircraft to prevent the
loss of control, or all of a particular asset, if an
aircraft is lost.
z Ensure all troop gear is  tied down and checked
and that short antennas are placed in radio,
folded down, and secured prior to loading.
z Ensure that squad and team leaders check the
equipment of their Marines to ensure it is com-
plete and operational.
z Ensure specific aircra ft seats are assigned to
each Marine.
PZ Closure
During platoon helicopterborne operations, the
platoon sergeant is resp onsible for ensuring all
personnel and eq uipment are loaded (clear the
PZ) and security is maintained.
Single Lift
The platoon sergeant positions himself at the last
aircraft and collects bumped Marines, if required.
He will be the la st person to load the aircraft.
Once on the aircraft, the platoon sergeant uses the
troop commander’s radio ha ndset to notify the
crew chief/mission commander that all personnel
and equipment are loaded . Close-in security is
provided by the aircraft door gunners.
Multiple Lifts 
The duties of the platoon sergeant during a multi-
ple lift are the same as for the single lift. During a
multiple lift, se curity teams maintain security of
the PZ and are the last el ement to depart with the
platoon sergeant. Depend ing on the initial loca-
tion(s) of the security teams, repositioning closer
to the PZ may be neces sary. Whenever possible,
the aircraft lands as close to the security team
positions as possible to enhance security and
minimize the movement required by the teams.
Helicopter Loading Sequence
The following helicopter  loading sequence is
used:
z The heliteam leader initiates movement once
the aircraft has landed.
Security
T eam
Security
T eam
Load
AA
RP
Load
AA
Load
AALoad
AA
Load
AA
Release
Point
Unit
AA
Unit
AA
Unit
AA
PZ ControlWoods
Woods
Trail
Figure A-3. Example of a Small, 
Two-sided Pickup Zone With 
Unit and Load Assembly Areas.

--- Page 88 ---
A-4 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
z The heliteam moves to the aircraft in file with
the heliteam leader leading the file.
z The heliteam leader should—
„ Ensure that all personnel know which air-
craft and which position to load.
„ Ensure that all personnel wear or carry packs
on the aircraft.
„ Notify the crew chief when all heliteam
members are on board and ready for liftoff.
z All personnel buckle up as soon as they are
seated in their assign ed seats. The heliteam
leader always sit in the left front seat unless a
platoon commander or company commander is
on the same aircraft.
z The heliteam leader re ports to the pilot and
answers any questions the pilot may have,
using the aircraft in tercommunication (troop
commander’s) headset.
Landing Zone Operations
Just as there is a prior ity of work for defensive
operations, there is a pr iority of actions upon
landing in an LZ.
Unloading
Unloading the aircraft  does not begin until
directed by the crew chie f or pilot. Once the air-
craft has landed, pers onnel unbuckle seatbelts
and exit aircraft as fast as possible with all equip-
ment. Prior to leaving th e aircraft, the heliteam
leader obtains the landi ng directions from the
pilot if not determined during the approach into
the LZ; this aids in orie ntation to the LZ, particu-
larly at night. Upon ex iting the aircraft, the heli-
copter team moves to its designated location
within the LZ.
Immediate Action on a Hot LZ
If the decision is made to use a hot LZ or contact
is made upon landing, troops quickly dismount
and move 15 to 20 meters  away from the aircraft
and immediately return the enemy’s fire to enable
the aircraft to depart the LZ. 
If the contact is simila r to a far ambush, troops
will fire and maneuver off the LZ to the closest
side offering cover and concealment. If troops are
engaged from nearby enemy positions, they treat it
as a near ambush by immediately returning fire.
Marines who consider themselves in the kill zone
may assault the enemy position(s) or attempt to
get out of the kill zone. Marines not in the kill
zone provide supporting fire to support the move-
ment of Marines in the kill zone. The squad or pla-
toon leader calls for fire support if it is available.
Once disengaged from the enemy force, the squad
or platoon leader moves th e unit to a covered and
concealed position, acc ounts for personnel and
equipment, and assesse s the situation as to
whether or not the unit can continue the mission.
Note
Expect assault aircraft gunners to return 
enemy fire when aircraft arrive and depart 
the LZ and while the aircraft is in the LZ.
Load Assembly Area in a Cold LZ
Upon unloading from the aircraft, the heliteam
leader moves the load to  its predetermined loca-
tion using traveling ove rwatch movement tech-
niques. All troops move at a fast pace to the
nearest concealed posi tion. Once at the con-
cealed assembly point, th e heliteam leader makes
a quick count of pers onnel and equipment and
then proceeds with the mission.
Duties of Key Personnel
To ensure that a helicopterborne operation is exe-
cuted in an effective manner, key personnel are
designated to perform specific duties.
Unit Leader
Platoon Commander
z Has overall responsibilit y for the helicopter-
borne operation. May act as the PZCO.

--- Page 89 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ A-5 
z Plans the operation.
z Briefs subordinate leaders.
z Issues OPORD.
z Conducts rehearsals.
z Rides in the AMC’s aircraft to ensure better
command, control, and communications.
Platoon Sergeant
z Sets up the PZ.
z Supervises marking of the PZ.
z Briefs all heliteam commanders.
z Supervises all activity in the PZ.
z PZ security.
z Movement of troops and equipment.
z Placement of loads and sling loads.
z Devises and disseminates the bump plan.
z Rides in the last airc raft for control purposes
and ensures that the PZ is cleared.
Heliteam Leader
z Briefs his personnel on their respective tasks
and positions inside the aircraft.
z Assigns respective areas of  security to his per-
sonnel. Ensures that each Marine goes to his
proper place.
z Supervises the loading of his helicopter team
into the aircraft to ensure that all personnel
assume assigned positio ns and have buckled
their seatbelts.
z Keeps current on location by use of his map
and communications with  the aircraft crew
during movement.
z Ensures, upon landing, that all personnel exit
the aircraft quickly and move to designated
positions within the LZ.
Pickup Zone Control Party
The PZ control party is responsible for the orga-
nization, control, and all coordinated operation in
the PZ. A PZ control party for a platoon helicop-
terborne operation may organize as follows:
z PZ control officer is a rifle platoon com-
mander.
z PZ control noncommissi oned officer in charge
is a platoon sergeant or guide.
z The radio operator has th ree radios: one radio
monitors the aviation net for communication
with the aircraft, anothe r is used to communi-
cate with the platoon’s subordinate units, and a
third operates on the company command net.
z There is one load li nkup guide per helicopter
team or load. His primary duties are to assist in
linkup and movement of load assembly area.
For platoon-sized helic opterborne operations,
these guides should be selected from the same
helicopter team squad they are assigned to.
z The lead aircraft signalman is responsible for
visual landing guidance for the lead aircraft.
The signalman can be selected from either the
helicopter team or the squad that is loading on
the lead aircraft.
z The hookup sending team is responsible for
load preparation and rigging. The hookup send-
ing team consists of a team supervisor/safety
observer, an inside director, an outside director,
a static discharge man, and two hookup men to
hook up the load. A simple sling load may only
require two Marines. During complex external
lifts, Marines from th e battalion HST may be
provided to supervise platoon HST operations.
Helicopterborne
Operations Communications
During establishment and operation of a platoon-
sized PZ, communications must be maintained
with aviation elements in order to control the air-
craft. Communications are also required to report
to the company headquarters and to control secu-
rity teams. During air movement, radio listening
silence is maintained on the company and platoon
radio nets unless otherwise directed. While on
board the aircraft, all leaders communicate with
their troops using pred etermined arm-and-hand
signals or stating the information on a piece of
paper or event map. Communication with the air-
craft crew is accomplished by using the troop
crew chief’s handset.

--- Page 90 ---
A-6 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
Landing Zone Communications
Immediately after unloadi ng the aircraft, radio
operators check their radi os to ensure they are
configured as necessa ry. Radio communications
on the LZ will be on the command frequency.
Arm-and-hand signals and messengers are used
to improve noise discipline.
Fire Support Communications
The rifle platoon makes requests for fire support
through the rifle company headquarters.
Sling Load Hookup Operations
In small sling load hookup operations, company
and below, six Marines are normally used as the
ground crew in the PZ and LZ: a team supervisor/
safety observer, an insi de director, an outside
director, a static disc harge man, and two hookup
men when needed by the platoon.
Static Discharge Equipment
The static electricity generated by helicopters dur-
ing flight can be fata l to Marines conducting
external loading and un loading operations. The
static discharge grounding wand (National Stock
Number [NSN] 1670-01-1 94-0926) protects the
user from static electrical shock during helicopter
external loading operations. It is important that all
Marines conducting external load functions be
trained in proper proced ures and familiar with
safety requirements. Marines should be trained in
HST operations and extern al load procedures by
landing support battalio n, FSSG. The equipment
required to conduct HS T operations, including
external loading, is dr awn from the landing sup-
port company prior to attempting external load-
ing and unloading. More  information on HST
operations is found in MCRP 4-11.3E.
Protective Equipment
All ground crew personne l will wear the follow-
ing protective equipment:
z Helmet.
z Protective mask or dust goggles.
z Earplugs.
z Gloves.
z Utility shirt with sleeves rolled down.
Ground Crew Emergency Procedures
The hookup team will work on the right side of
the load in order to move  out to the right of the
aircraft in case of emer gencies. If an emergency
occurs during a sling loading operation, the
ground crew moves to the helicopter’s right and
the helicopter moves to  its left. The signalman
moves out of the helicopt er’s flight path by mov-
ing to the helicopter’s right.
Safety Briefing
Prior to a helicopterbo rne operation, leaders
within the unit chain of command give a safety
briefing to all personnel.  All leaders will enforce
strict safety measures when working with heli-
copters. At a minimum, the safety briefing
address the following issues:
z Identification tags and earplugs will be worn at
all times when near or in an aircraft.
z Helmets, with chinstraps fastened, will be
worn at all times.
z Helicopter safety measures for avoidance of
tail rotors and proper  loading and unloading
procedures.
z M-16 rifles will be ca rried with the muzzle
pointed downward, pistol grip forward, bolt
closed, magazine in the weapon, and weapon
on SAFE. Rounds will not be chambered. Bay-
onets will not be fixed.
z Hand grenades will be secured.

--- Page 91 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ A-7 
z Short antennas will be bent completely down
and long antennas will be tied down when
using radios in proximity of helicopters.
z Seatbelts will be fast ened upon entering the
helicopter and left buck led until the crew chief
signals to exit the aircraft.
z In the event of a for ced landing, all personnel
will lean forward with  their heads down until
the aircraft comes to rest . No one will exit the
aircraft until the main rotor has completely
stopped.

--- Page 92 ---
APPENDIX B
AIR MISSION COMMANDER’S OR AIR OFFICER’S CHECKLIST
This list summarizes the essential items included in the planning phase of  the helicopterborne operation
by the air mission commander. The list is referred to throughout the planning process to ensure major
item are not omitted.
1. Action Prior to Depa rture for Supporting Unit
Meet attack helicopter and reconnaissance representatives at pre-arranged site. Obtain briefing from des-
ignated helicopter unit operations officer that addresses support unit(s), mission, and planning data.
a. Support unit(s) .
(1) Mission.
(2) Location.
(3) Contact officer.
(4) FM frequency.
(5) Call sign.
b. Mission
.
(1) Requirements for ae rial reconnaissance.
(a) Utility helicopters.
(b) Attack helicopters.
(c) Other assets.
(2) Special mission requests.
(3) Number of aircraft, by type, th at are available for the operation.
(4) Utility, observation, cargo, a nd C2 helicopters required.
(5) Attack helicopters required.
c. Planning data for aircraft lo ad for each type of aircraft
.
(1) Number of troops _____; pounds of cargo _____.
(2) Number of reconnaissance av ailable and time available.
(3) HST equipment available.

--- Page 93 ---
B-2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
(4) Specific problem areas or requirements that  may affect support of ground unit (FARP loca-
tion and time of operation). (Estimated refueling time and refuel-rearm plan.)
(5) Obtain necessary equipment that will be requi red at or by the supported unit. (Special at-
tention to HST external load requirements.)
(a) Aircraft or vehicle.
(b) Map, overlays, photographs.
(c) Radios, CEOI for exchange.
(d) Personal gear.
(e) Additional headsets for reconnaissance, if required.
(f) Slings, nets, or other HST equipment.
(6) Check with the HUC for special instructions.
2. Actions En Route
a. Establish and maintain communications.
b. Obtain status of fires and perm ission to enter area of operations.
3. Actions at Supporting Unit Location
a. Report to supported commander, S-3, or air officer.
b. Brief supported unit on number and t ype of aircraft available, aircraft load, and other essential 
information.
c. Obtain initial briefing on the following:
(1) Enemy situation.
(2) Friendly situation.
(3) Ground tactical plan (make map overlays).
d. Assist supported unit in planning.
(1) Movement to PZ for ground and av iation unit and control facilities.
(2) Loading.
(a) Location and selection of PZ.
(b) Special PZ marking procedures.
(c) Aircraft marking procedures.
(d) Landing formation and direction.

--- Page 94 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________  B-3 
(e) Loads (HWSAT and HEALT).
1 Troops.
2 Cargo.
(f) Communications control procedures.
(g) PZ control (obtain call sign and frequency).
(h) Manifesting.
(i) Prioritization of bump by aircraft.
(j) PZ and lift-off times.
(k) GO/NO-GO criteria.
e. Air movement.
(1) The flight route provid es guidance and information relative to flight times.
(2) Select en route formation that  gives the most control and is least vulnerable to enemy inter-
ference; provide guidance for selection of PZ and LZ formation.
(3) Altitude and speed.
(4) Overwatch and security pl an for attack helicopters.
(5) Fire support plan en route.
(6) Air movement plan.
(7) Reconnaissance HST support (finalize).
f. Landing.
(1) Touchdown times (in terms of H-hour).
(2) LZ location and desi gnations and locations.
(3) Size and description.
(4) LZ marking and procedures.
(5) Landing directions.
(6) Landing formations.
(7) Traffic pattern for sequent lifts.
(8) Communications, control proce dures, and use of reconnaissance.
g. LZ preparatory and suppressive fires.
(1) CAS (start time, duration, target a nd type of fuze, special instructions).

--- Page 95 ---
B-4 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
(2) Indirect fires (start time, duration, targ et and type of fuze, special instructions).
(3) Plan for attack helicopter unit’s scheme of  maneuver and plan for overwatch and security 
(start time, duration, special instruction, attack direction).
(4) Firing plan of debarking troops.
(5) Call signs and/or frequency signals fo r lifting and/or shifting support fires.
h. Refueling requirements.
(1) Location of FARP(s).
(2) Time required.
(3) Determine amount of fuel  required to support mission
i. Aircraft maintenance.
(1) Downed aircraft procedures.
(2) Spare aircraft procedures.
4. Actions Prior to Depa rture From Supported Unit
a. Obtain copies of OPORD with overlays and annexes.
b. Confirm all times.
c. Last minute weather check.
(1) Mission procedures (delay increments).
(2) Alert procedures.
d. Debrief the commander.
5. Actions Upon Return to Aviation Unit
a. Inform unit commander.
b. Brief personnel, as appropria te, on all above information.
c. Maintain close liaison with support unit.

--- Page 96 ---
APPENDIX C
HELICOPTERBORNE UNIT COMMANDER’S CHECKLIST
This list is designed to summarize the essential item s that should be included in  the planning phase of a
helicopterborne operation by the HUC. The list should be referred to throughout the planning process to
ensure that major planning steps are not omitted.
1. Action Upon Receipt of Orders
a. Analyze mission(s).
b. Determine specified and impl ied task(s) and objective(s).
c. Develop time schedule.
d. Obtain aircraft availability information from mission commander and/or air officer.
e. Issue warning order.
2. Ground Tactical Plan
a. Choose, as appropria te, assault objectives.
b. Designate LZ(s) available for use. Consid er distances from LZ(s) to objective(s).
c. Establish D-day and H- hour (time of assault).
d. Identify special tasks required to accomplish mission.
e. Means available to accomplish mission.
(1) Organic troops (consider distance from present location to PZ).
(2) Aviation resources to include attack helicopters (establish liaison with mission commander 
and obtain initial information relative to support requirements from ground unit to include 
FARP support).
(3) Engineers.
(4) Fire support.
(a) CAS.
(b) Artillery within range.
(c) Other indirect fire weapons  (mortar and naval gunfire).
(d) Preparation fires for LZs (s ignals for lifting/shifting).
(e) Flight corridors.

--- Page 97 ---
C-2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
(f) Air defense suppression.
(5) Control measures needed.
(6) Subsequent operations (e.g., defense li nkup, withdrawal) that may be conducted.
3. Intelligence Information and Requirements
a. Enemy locations to incl ude air defense positions.
b. Commander’s aerial r econnaissance of objective area (if practical).
c. Aerial reconnaissance 
d. Sensor reports.
e. Terrain study.
f. Weather forecast.
g. Latest intelligence summary.
h. POW handling procedures.
i. Civilian control procedures.
j. PZ/LZ information.
k. Approach and retirement lane information.
4. Landing
a. Selection of primary and alternate LZ(s) (capacity).
b. LZ identification proce dures for landing sites.
(1) Colored smoke.
(2) Panels.
(3) Flares.
(4) Lights.
c. Use of reconnaissance/S-2.
d. Landing formation(s).
e. Approach and departure directions.
f. LZ preparation fire to support la nding plan and ground tactical plan.
(1) Use of CAS, air defense suppression.
(2) Use of indirect fire weapons.
(3) Use of EW.

--- Page 98 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________  C-3 
g. Other fire support considerations.
(1) Shifting of fires.
(2) Lifting of fires.
(3) SEAD.
5. Air Movement
a. Flight routes (primary, alternate, return).
(1) Direction and distance to LZs.
(2) Checkpoints along route.
(3) Phase lines of used.
(4) Estimate time in route.
(5) Laagers (if used) to indicat e location, mission, and security.
(6) Friendly air defe nse considerations.
(7) Enemy air defense intelligence.
b. Information to implement air movement.
(1) Units to be lifted.
(2) Number of types of lift heli copters allocated to each unit.
(3) Lift capability (maximum weig ht) for each aircraft type.
(4) Aviation units supporting unit.
(5) Lift off times.
(6) Routes.
(7) Unit LZs.
(8) L-hour (landing time of initial lift).
c. Alternate communications plan.
(1) FM.
(2) UHF.
(3) VHF.
(4) Visual/audio signals.
(5) Aerial radio relay.

--- Page 99 ---
C-4 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
6. Loading
a. PZ assignment by unit (primary, alternat e) (bump/ straggler contingency plan).
b. Holding areas.
c. Routes from assembly areas to holding area to PZ(s).
d. Attack helicopter utilizat ion (overwatch and security).
(1) En route to PZ.
(2) While lift aircraft are in PZ.
(3) En route to LZ.
(4) Reconnaissance of LZ; marki ng of LZ in absence of ITG.
7. Support Plans for Conduct of  Helicopterborne Operations
a. Alternate plans and procedures due to we ather (H-hour increment to delay operation).
b. Downed helicopter procedures.
(1) Crew and passenger duties.
(2) Aircraft disposition instruction.
c. Rally points.
d. Escape and evasion instructions.
e. Laager sites.
f. Rules of engagement.
g. Deception plans that will be used.
h. Spare aircraft available.
i. Reconnaissance (air-ground) that will be conducted.
j. Straggler control procedures.
k. Reporting (en route, liftoff, t ouchdown, intelligence, and contact).
l. Aircraft disposi tion after assault.
m. Medical support and evacuation procedures.
8. Actions That Must be Completed
a. Warning orders.
b. Liaison officer (receive and dispatch).
c. Briefing (time and place).

--- Page 100 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________  C-5 
d. Preparation of OPORD.
e. Issue OPORD (time and place).
9. Logistics Requirements
a. Class V resupply.
b. Feeding plan.
c. Weather.
d. Casualty evaucation (call sign, fre quency, location, and procedures).
e. Refueling (location of FA RP, ammunition available).
10. Debriefing
a. Lessons learned.
(1) Ground units.
(2) Aviation units.
b. Actions taken for correction.

--- Page 101 ---
APPENDIX D
LANDING ZONE BRIEF
The landing zone brief is given prior to the transpor t helicopter landing in th e LZ.  LZ brief radio trans-
mission are addressed by line number.  Unknown or not applicab le line numbers are re ferred to as nega-
tive.  For example: line one-negative, line two-98632, line three-C3E, line four-negative, etc.
LANDING ZONE BRIEF
1. MISSION NO. ________________________________________
2. LOCATION COOR/RAD/DME ________________________________________
3. UNIT CALL SIGN ________________________________________
4. FREQUENCY PRI UH F _____________ FM _______________
SEC UHF _____________ FM _______________
5. LZ MARKING ________________________________________
6. WIND DIRECTION/VELOCITY ______________________ / _________________
7. ELEVATION/SIZE ______________________ / _________________
8. OBSTACLES _________________________________________
9. FRIENDLY POSITIONS:
DIRECTION/DISTANCE ______________________ / _________________
10. LAST FIRE RECEIVED: 
TIME/TYPE ______________________ / _________________
11. DIRECTION OF FIRE/DISTANCE ______________________ / _________________
12. CLEARANCE TO FIRE:
DIRECTION/DISTANCE ______________________ / _________________
13. APPROACH/RETIREMENT
(RECOMMENDED) ______________________ / _________________
14. PERSONNEL/EQUIPMENT ______________________ / _________________
15. OTHER _________________________________________

--- Page 102 ---
APPENDIX E
EXAMPLE OF AN ANNEX TO BATTALION
SOPS FOR HELICOPTERBORNE OPERATIONS
1. General
a. Purpose . This annex prescribes the organization and procedures to be followed in the  
preparation and execution of helicopterborne operations. Only procedures peculiar to 
helicopterborne operations are included; otherwise, basic SOPs apply.
b. Application .  Applies to all organic and supporting units under control of _____ Battalion, 
_____ Marines/// _____MEU, MEB, MEF.
2. Personnel
a. Strength, Records, and Reports
(1) Companies are organized into  assault and rear echelons. Upon receipt of warning order, 
companies submit strength to S-1 and equipment availability status to S-4. S-1 and S-4 forward 
this information to the S-3 in order to determine flight requirements.
(2) Upon entering LZ, companies report personne l and equipment status to the battalion 
command post on the tactical net using the standard format.
b. Discipline and Order
(1) S-1 establishes a straggler control point on each PZ in coordination with the S-3 and 
PZCO. All units will have a representative located at the straggler control point on their PZ(s). 
Bumped personnel are reported to the S-1 and/or PZCO by straggler control personnel for 
consolidation and rescheduling into appropriate LZ(s).
(2) Straggler control becomes the company’s responsibility upon landing.
(3) Personnel landed in other than assigned LZ are to report to the on-site unit commander 
(representative) immediately. Personnel are attached to that unit until ordered to return to 
parent unit by this headquarters. Gaining unit reports attached personnel to the S-1 by their 
number and parent unit. Do not include attached personnel in unit strength reports.
c. Prisoner of War Evacuation . POWs are immediately reported to the S-3, who issues evacuation 
instructions. Units detaining POWs indicate available PZ location for pickup by air in their initial 
reports. The S-2 determines whether to evacuate through battalion or direct to higher headquarters.
d. Casualty Evacuation . Report all casualties for casualty evacuation by priority code.

--- Page 103 ---
E-2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
(1) Casualty evacuation requests follow standard format for casualties and are classified as 
routine, priority, or urgent. Radio frequency of supporting casualty evacuation units are 
included in each OPORD. When casualty evacuation aircraft are not available and immediate 
casualty evacuation is required, make maximum use of empty lift helicopters departing LZ. Do 
not interrupt air loading operations—use last helicopters in the flight.
(2) The S-1 is responsible fo r providing CEOI, LZs, and flight route overlay to supporting 
casualty evacuation units.
3. Intelligence
a. Weather
(1) Battalion S-2 obtains and disseminates the following:
z Long-range forecast immediately after receipt of mission.
z Short-range forecasts up to H-2.
(2) Command weather reconnaissance 1 hour pr ior to lift-off is coordinated among the 
commander, S-2, and air mission commander.
(3) Operations are executed only on order of th is headquarters when weather is below half-
mile visibility and 100-foot ceiling.
b. Terrain
(1) Maximize use of command aerial reco nnaissance down to company commanders, 
consistent with aviation resources, available time, and tactical situation.
(2) Use sand table briefing techniques when po ssible in conjunction with maps and aerial 
photographs.
(3) Issue maps immediately after re ceipt of warning order, if available. If not available, they 
are issued on receipt from higher headquarters.
(4) Aerial photographs are made available upon receipt. The S-2 processes all requests 
(conserving assets, as appropriate). Priority is given to answering priority intelligence 
requirements and support of the assault echelon.
c. Escape and Evasion
(1) Personnel in aircraft forced to land behi nd enemy lines en route to the objective will:
z Establish immediate security in vicinity of downed aircraft.
z Remain in that location using aircraft radios to contact recovery aircraft.
z Mark and clear suitable landing points for recovery and withdrawal helicopters.
(2) The senior ground force individual assumes re sponsibility for organization and conduct of 
security until recovery is executed.
(3) If the above is not possible due to enemy pressure, evade capture and attempt to join 
friendly units by infiltration. Personnel attempt to escape and evade back along flight route 
because maximum rescue efforts are directed along flight routes, with particular emphasis at 

--- Page 104 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________  E-3 
checkpoints. Continuous attempts will be made to locate suitable LZ/LP for withdrawal by 
helicopter(s). The wounded are evacuated with infiltrating personnel. The dead are concealed 
and stripped of weapons, ammunition, and items of intelligence value. The locations of the 
dead left behind are recorded.
(4) If enemy pressure becomes a threat to dow ned aircraft personnel, the senior ground force 
individual take steps to secure or destroy classified or sensitive items. Aircraft destruction is 
only on order of this headquarters if capture is not imminent. If contact with this headquarters 
cannot be made, the senior individual on the ground attempts to prevent capture by enemy.
4. Operations
a. Planning Phase
(1) Except when accomplished by higher headquart ers, this headquarters prepares plans in 
coordination with the supporting air mission commander.
(2) Plans continue to be refined until exec uted. All operational information is given to 
subordinate commanders as soon as determined,  particularly—
z The size and composition of the force required to execute the mission.
z Allocation of assault and logistical aircraft, based on allowable cargo load provided by 
the mission commander.
z Designated PZs and helicopter PZ formations. Designated flight routes, LZs, and LZ 
helicopter formation.
(3) Coordination between the supported and s upporting commanders must include, at a 
minimum— 
z Enemy and friendly situation.
z Mission.
z Fire support plan.
z Abort and alternate plans.
z Weather (including minimums and delays).
z Type, number, and aircraft load of helicopters.
z Helicopter formations in PZ and LZ.
z Air movement information relative to timing for operations.
z Communication (primary and alternate frequencies and plans).
z Location and call sign of second in command.
z Required command reconnaissance by the helicopterborne commander and supporting 
aviation commanders.
z Time synchronization requirements.
z TRAP procedures.
(4) Operations Security . OPSEC is emphasized in each phase of a helicopterborne operation. 
The objective is to conceal the capabilities and intentions of the helicopterborne force. Four, 
general OPSEC measures are considered for every operation: deception, signal security, 
physical security, and information security. The S-2 provides intelligence collection of threat 
data. The S-3 ensures that the staff and subordinate commanders are aware of OPSEC measures 

--- Page 105 ---
E-4 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
to be employed to counter the threat. Emphasis is placed on maintaining the elements of 
surprise and security. Additionally, all supporting elements must be aware of the necessity of 
maintaining a high degree of operational security. At a minimum, the commander, supporting 
commanders, and subordinate commanders employ the following techniques:
z Deception—
„ Camouflage vehicles, equipment, and personnel.
„ Overflights of other LZs (if aircraft are available and enemy situation does not 
preclude).
„ Insertion at night or during other periods of reduced visibility.
„ Noise and light discipline.
„ Dummy larger sites for aircraft.
„ Reconnaissance overflights of several objectives.
z Signal security—
„ Communications security techniques.
„ Radio listening silence.
„ Use of hand and arm signals (on the ground).
„ Use of low power and secure mode on radios.
z Physical security—
„ Use of security forces at LZ and PZ.
„ Use of wires, mines, barriers, and security troops at aircraft larger sites and troop 
assembly areas.
„ Use of reconnaissance unit to secure LZ, if possible.
z Information security—
„ Counterintelligence.
„ Strict control of all operational information.
„ Release information only to those with a need to know.
z Last minute release of attack time (objective) and force composition.
b. Landing Phase
(1) The aircraft commander notifie s each helicopter team leader of any changes to the order, 
any change in LZ(s) and/or direction of landing, and when the helicopter is over the release 
point. The helicopter team leader then informs his personnel of any changes and alerts them to 
prepare to unload.
(2) Passengers may not move in the aircraft  until clearance has been obtained from the 
helicopter team leader via the helicopter crew chief. After the helicopter team leader gives the 
clearance signal, troops and equipment are unloaded as rapidly as possible.
(3) After all troops and cargo have  been unloaded from the aircraft, the crew chief checks the 
helicopter and signals the helicopter team leader that the cabin is empty. Departure from the 
aircraft is executed rapidly in the direction prescribed by the battle drill.
(4) The helicopter team leader ensures that me mbers of his helicopter team clear the LZ in a 
safe, expeditious manner. This prevents exposing personnel to unnecessary danger and 
prevents any delay in lift-off and landing of subsequent helicopters.

--- Page 106 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________  E-5 
(5) Individual weapons are fired only upon order during offloading unless enemy contact is 
made or if planned as part of the overall fire plan.
(6) If there is no enemy contact on the LZ, actions are as follows:
z Move each helicopter load to the nearest covered and concealed position in direction of 
the assembly area.
z Establish LZ security for succeeding lifts (if applicable).
z Assemble, organize, and account for all personnel.
z Report.
(7) If enemy contact is made on the LZ, actions are as follows:
z Return fire immediately, upon offloading, with all available firepower to gain fire 
superiority.
z Fight by helicopter loads, using fire and movement, until platoon or company can be 
formed (according to battle drill).
z Request and coordinate fire support.
z Secure the LZ for succeeding lifts.
z Report.
(8) Keep the commander informed during all actions.
c. Air Movement Phase
(1) Maintain radio silence to maximum extent possible. Inability to comply with specific 
control times are reported as prescribed in OPORD.
(2) Troop leader remains oriented by  continuous map-terrain comparisons.
d. Loading Plan
(1) The PZ is designated by this headquarters.
(2) The air officer arrives prior to  the helicopter flight and reports to the PZCO for last-minute 
briefing and coordination. The air officer notifies the air mission commander of any changes.
(3) Serials are organized to support the ground tactical plan.
(4) Helicopters land in the PZ(s) in the specif ied formation. Unit leaders brief troops on the 
helicopter formation prior to arrive of helicopters at PZ.
(5) Helicopters should land as close to their esti mated time of arrival as possible to reduce 
time-on-ground before loading. 
(6) During a battalion move, the battalion XO, or designated representative, acts as the PZCO 
and the headquarters commandant acts as the LZ control officer. The company XO acts as 
PZCO during company-sized operations and as unit PZCO during battalion-sized operations. 
PZCOs are responsible for developing and disseminating the PZ control plan. The PZCO 
maintains contact with the AMC on a designated radio frequency. Each unit to be moved will 
have radio contact with the PZCO 15 minutes prior to aircraft arrival. Units must be prepared to 
alter loads based on change of helicopter availability or change in allowable cargo load. Within 

--- Page 107 ---
E-6 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
each company, platoon, and squad, a priority of loading must be established. Priority of aircraft 
loads and personnel on each aircraft to be bumped will be designated. Bumped personnel report 
to the straggler control point immediately.
(7) The supporting aviation unit assists in pla nning for the execution of loading by providing 
technical advice and supervision.
(8) The heliteam leader supervises helicopter loading.
(9) Cargo or equipment to be transported externa lly is secured in cargo nets or on pallets for 
sling loading under helicopters. Hookup of these slings is accomplished by the HST in the PZ.
(10) Preparations for indi viduals are as follows:
z Fasten helmet chinstraps.
z Collapse bipods on M-240s and M-16s.
z Tie down loose equipment.
z Place all weapons in a condition 3 status.
z Unfix bayonets (if fixed).
z Radio operators use short whip antennas only and depress antennas to avoid breakage 
and to reduce the safety hazard. When directed, they check communications with the tacti-
cal operations center, ensuring that the radio remains on during flight. They will have a 
minimum to two extra batteries for each radio.
(11) An accurate list for each aircraft load by name, grade, and unit is furnished to the battalion 
S-1 through the unit officer in charge of loading.
(12) The following sequence should be followed during the loading phase:
z Secure PZ.
z Approach aircraft only after it has landed.
z Do not load until directed by PZ control personnel.
z Load at double time.
z Move to the aircraft and load as directed by the heliteam leader.
(13) When loading personnel and cargo into a heli copter, the heliteam leader ensures that the 
following is accomplished:
z All safety measures prescribed for movement in and about the helicopter are observed.
z All personnel approach the helicopter in the prescribed manner.
z Personnel are aware of and avoid the tail rotor and engine exhaust outlets.
z All personnel and equipment stay below the arc of the top rotor and load on the oppo-
site side of the tail rotor. Personnel should be especially watchful when loading on the 
slope of a hill; therefore, approach and depart a helicopter on downslope side. The aircrew 
indicates which side to enter/exit the helicopter.
(14) Briefing on emergencies are conducted by an aviation representative prior to loading, as 
appropriate.

--- Page 108 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________  E-7 
(15) Upon loading, the helicopter team comma nder provides the gross weight of the load 
(personnel + all equipment) to the pilot in command or the crew chief.
(16) After all equipment and pers onnel have been loaded, the helicopter team commander, in 
coordination with the aircraft crew chief, determines that—
z Equipment and cargo are in the proper places.
z Cargo or equipment is properly secured.
z Each Marine is seated and his safety belt fastened.
z Weapons are placed between legs; muzzle down (except on the UH-1N which is 
boarded muzzle up).
(17) When the helicopter team commander has checked to ensure that all cargo and personnel 
are accounted for, he notifies the aircraft commander or crew chief. The crew chief ensures that 
all personnel and equipment are properly secured for flight.
(18) During flight, the pilot commands the aircra ft. The helicopter team leader ensures the 
following is accomplished:
z Cargo lashing (if applicable) is checked to determine that cargo is properly secured.
z Troops keep belts secure and do not smoke or sleep during flight.
z Troops stay seated and do not move around without authorization.
(19) In the event that more than one lift is re quired, the PZCO remains until the last lift to 
ensure control and continuous communication.
(20) General aircraft load  planning requires that—
z All units develop general load plans to facilitate movement on short notice.
z The necessary equipment for aircraft loading and movement (nets, slings, and clevises) 
is kept on hand.
z Battalion personnel are organized and trained in loading equipment (including sling 
loads).
z Vehicles and major equipment are prepared at all times to facilitate airlift operations. 
Vehicles and major equipment to be transported into objective area are reported with 
strength figures.
e. Subsequent Operations
(1) Withdrawal by Air . Withdrawal from an area of operations requires thorough planning, 
close coordination, and controlled execution. The following are considered important for any 
withdrawal by air:
z Primary and alternate PZs and flight routes must be planned.
z Defensive concentrations must be planned around the PZ. The security force protects 
the loading force and returns fire if engaged. When the last elements are ready to load, the 
security force calls in required fires to cover withdrawal and uses their own fire to cover 
their loading.
z All around security until the first helicopter is on the ground (never assemble too early) 
must be maintained.

--- Page 109 ---
E-8 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
z Loads must be planned so that a force is capable of defending itself until the last lift 
(never leave less than a platoon size force). The platoon leader/sergeant or squad leader 
with a radio is the last man out of a PZ and reports to his commander that the PZ is clear 
of all personnel and equipment and immediately notifies the pilot of the helicopter he 
boards. If possible, plan for at least two extra helicopters to go into the PZ to lift out the 
last unit.
z The attack helicopter unit will be in direct communication with the HUC.
(2) Displacement of Command Post  
(a) The quartering party is composed of S-1 or headquarters commandant, 
communications officer or representative, communications personnel, security element, 
and other necessary personnel, and they select the location of the command post.
(b) The C2 helicopter is used as th e main command post during movement.
(c) Quartering party duties upon landing include—
z Laying out the new command post.
z Notifying the old command post when the new command post is ready for 
operation.
z Ensuring timely and orderly arrival and positioning of other command post  
elements.
z Opening the new command post. The officer in charge notifies the commander or 
S-3 when the old command post has closed and when the staff is operational in the 
new location.
z Providing controlling responsibilities. A C2 helicopter is used as the tactical 
command post to control and direct subordinate elements during air movement. The 
old command post is responsible for the dissemination of information and reports to 
higher and adjacent headquarters until that function is formally passed to the new 
command post.
(3) Passive Security of Aircraft in Unit Areas. The security of supporting aviation is the 
responsibility of the unit commander in whose area they are laagered or as designated by the 
headquarters.
(a) Laagers (occupancy, 1 to 36 hours) have the following characteristics:
z Select proper terrain for laagers where access by enemy ground forces is difficult 
(e.g., laagers surrounded by water or swamps).
z Site aircraft to blend with terrain and vegetation (e.g., locate parking areas in 
shadows, near trees).
z Park aircraft in laagers so that attack helicopters can provide security along 
avenues of approach. Lift of aircraft, if attacked by enemy, is the responsibility of 
the ACE commander.
z Utilize troops in or near the laagers to provide perimeter security. Helicopter 
units augment security.

--- Page 110 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________  E-9 
(b) Semipermanent facilitie s (occupancy, 1 to 7 weeks) have the following 
characteristics:
z Use camouflage nets and natural materials to provide concealment.
z Provide perimeter troop security around airfields and helipads.
z Construct individual and helicopter bunkers and continue progressive 
improvement as time permits.
5. Logistics
a. Supply
(1) Accompanying Supplies—All Classes . Prescribed supplies are established by the 
headquarters for each helicopterborne operation.
(a) Class I . Each Marine carries three combat ration meals to be eaten on order.
(b) Class II and IV . Units take one day’s supply of required combat essential 
expendables.
(c) Class III . Vehicle fuel tanks are filled three-fourths full and gas cans are filled to the 
weld. Units take one day’s supply of oil and lubricants on vehicles.
(d) Class V . Units maintain basic load at all times. Available supply rates and priority of 
delivery as specified in OPORD.
(e) Class IX . Units take combat essential prescribed load list.
(f) Water . Marines carry two full canteens and one bottle of water purification tablets.
(2) All classes of supply are delivered using unit distribution.
(3) Routine, planned supplies are prepackaged to the maximum extent possible by the S-4.
(4) Emergency resupply containing ammunition, water, rations, and medical supplies are 
prepackaged by the S-4 and are ready for delivery as required.
b. Salvage
(1) Expedite recovery of aerial delivery cont ainers, cargo nets, and pallets; commanders 
guard against damage, destruction, or loss.
(2) Units in objective area establish salvage co llecting points when appropriate and practical.
(3) Salvage is reported to this hea dquarters for disposition instructions.
c. Captured Material . Captured material may be used on approval of this headquarters. 
Evacuation of captured material is accomplished, as the situation allows, though S-4 channels.
d. Medical Support  
(1) Casualty evacuation of patients, until linkup or withdrawal, will be by air.
(2) Aid station location is nor mally in the battalion’s rear.

--- Page 111 ---
E-10 __________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
(3) Requests for casualty evacuation  within the helicopterborne operations area is made to 
the medical organization on the casualty evacuation frequency or the administrative logistic 
net.
(4) POW casualties needing medical treatmen t are evacuated through medical channels.
(5) Hospital locations are announced for each operation.
e. Transportation and Troop Movement
(1) Vehicular
(a) Allocation of accompanying organic tr ansport is made by this headquarters.
(b) Captured vehicles are used to the ma ximum to meet transportation requirements.
(2) Aircraft . Allocation of supporting aircraft is made by this headquarters.
6. Visual and Sound Signals
a. Use visual and sound signals as required a nd prescribed by CEOI and unit SOP and as 
modified by battalion OPORD.
b. Subordinate units empl oy only those pyrotechnics specifically authorized by OPORD or CEOI.
7. Electronic Warfare
a. Radio stations will not attempt to enter, jam,  or otherwise interfere with unknown radio nets 
without prior approval of this headquarters.
b. Report (by a secure means) jamming or atte mpts to enter nets by unknown stations to the 
communications officer without delay. Give time, radio frequency, type of jamming, signal strength, 
readability, and identity (if obtainable) of interfering station.

--- Page 112 ---
APPENDIX F
FORMATS FOR THE FIVE BASIC PLANS
Successful use of helicopters requires a careful analys is of METT-T and detaile d, precise reverse plan-
ning. The formats provi ded in this appendix provid e a guide for the developmen t of the five basic plans
that comprise a helicopberborne operation.
Page
Ground Tactical Plan F-2
Landing Plan F-4
Air Movement Plan F-6
Loading Plan F-8
Staging Plan F-10

--- Page 113 ---
F-2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
GROUND TACTICAL PLAN
All planning evolves around this pla n. The plan specifies actions in the objective area that ultimately
accomplish the mission. The informati on listed below provides a guide that  can be used to establish the
plan.
1. MAGTF Commander’s Mission and Intent .
2. GCE Commander’s Mission and Intent .
3. HUC Mission and Intent .
4. Forced Time Schedule .
a. Time that assault elements land (L-hour).
b. Reverse planning sequence.
5. Actions Required in the Objective Area .
Secure LZ __________ ____________________.
(name/coord) (name/ coord)(name/coord)
Establish LZ control at above LZ(s).
Secure Objective(s)______________________________.
(name/coord) (name/coord)(name/coord)
Time Event
L-hour
1st assault wave(s) arrive in PZ
Assault element arrives in assembly area
Assault element arrives in holding area
Assault element arrives in PZ
Issue warning order
Intelligence (S-2) brief
Commander’s guidance
Staff briefs
Operations order
Mission brief

--- Page 114 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________  F-3 
Perform the following actions upon securing objective(s):
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
6. Mission Assigned to Subordinate Units .
Co _____________________________
Co _____________________________
Co _____________________________
Co _____________________________
Attachments with assault elements:
Follow on attachments:
7. Coordinating Instructions
:

--- Page 115 ---
F-4 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
LANDING PLAN
The landing plan must support the ground tactical plan. The plan seque nces elements into the area of
operations so that units arrive at locations and times prepared to execute the ground tactical plan. The
information listed below provides a guide that can be used to establish the plan.
1. Size and location of pr imary and alternate LZ(s):
2. Known and suspected enemy lo cations in and around the LZ:
3. Unit tactical integrit y and spread loading:
z Squads in one aircraft.
z Platoons in one wave.
z Key leaders NOT loaded on the same aircraft.
z Crew-served weapons and crews sufficiently spread loaded.
4. All members briefed and oriented to the landing:
z Briefed on actions at the LZ.
z Briefed on actions to secure the LZ.
Primary LZ
Size Location
Size Location
Size Location
Size Location
Alternate LZ
Size Location
Size Location
Size Location
Size Location
Size Location
Size Location
Size Location
Size Location

--- Page 116 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________  F-5 
5. Task organization:
z For landing.
z Subsequent to landing.
6. Determine who decides to switch to an alternate LZ:
z HUC.
z S-1.
z AMC.
z Assault flight leader.
7. Factors in deciding to switch to alternate LZ(s):
z LZ too hot.
z Downed aircraft in LZ.
z Escort warning of ambush.
z Other.
8. Plan for supporting fires:
z Planned fires for air movement .
z Planned fires for landing.
z Preparation fires in LZ.
z Preparation fires near LZ:
„ Distant preparation fires
„ Preplanned fires in and around LZ
„ On-call fires
z Planned fires subsequent to landing.
9. Plans for casualty evacuation:
z Air.
z Ground.
10. Plans for resupply:
z Air.
z Ground.

--- Page 117 ---
F-6 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
AIR MOVEMENT PLAN
The air movement plan is based on the ground tact ical and landing plans. Th e plan specifies the air
movement schedule and provides inst ructions for the air movement of  troops, equipmen t, and supplies
from PZs to LZs. The following information provides a guide that can be used to establish the plan.
1. Tentative flight routes are se lected by the AFL. The HUC’s S-2 studies the mutes and makes recom-
mendations. The HUC’s S-3 closely notes checkpoints and control features.
2. The air movement schedule is de veloped to accomplish the landing plan. The air movement sched-
ule is provided by the helicopter transport commander. The HUC studies the schedule and makes recom-
mendations.
3. Air speed, flight altitudes, and aircraft  formations are determined by the AFL.
4. Escort of transport helicopters and air fire s upport during air movement is determined by the air 
commander.
5. Aircraft availability inform ation is provided to the HUC
CH-46E ____________
CH-53D____________
CH-53E____________
UH-IN ____________
AH-lW ____________
fixed-wing available:
6. The wave allocation of transport he licopters is determined by the HUC.
1WV 2WV 3WV 4WV
CH-46E__________ __________ __________ ___________
CH-53D__________ __________ __________ ___________
CH-53E__________ __________ __________ ___________
UH-1N__________ __________ __________ ___________
7. Wave allocation of escort aircraft  is determined by the air commander
WV 2WV 3WV 4WV
AH-lW__________ __________ __________ ___________
8. Air departure points from a start point in the sky to the LZ are determined by the air commander.
9. Loading times are determined by the air commander.

--- Page 118 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________  F-7 
WavePZ Load Time
1 ____________
2 ____________
3 ____________
4 ____________
10. Lift off times are determined by the air commander.
WaveLift Off Time
1 ____________
2 ____________
3 ____________
4 ____________

--- Page 119 ---
F-8 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
LOADING PLAN
The loading plan is based on the air movement plan. It ensures that Marines, equipment, and supplies are
loaded on the correct aircraft. Helic opter loads are also placed in prio rity to establish a hump plan. The
following information provides a guide that can be used to establish the plan.
1. Refer to paragraphs 5 and 6 of th e guide for the air movement plan.
a. Review the total number (by type ) of transport aircraft available.
b. Review the number of aircraft by type allocated to each wave.
2. Determine which personnel, weapons, and e quipment will be loaded on each aircraft.
a. Maintain unit integrity.
b. Spread load key personne l, weapons, and equipment.
3. Determine if the preparation of a written document is necessary. An informal document lists the per-
sonnel, key weapon, and equipment by aircraft. A formal document includes a HWSAT.
4. Establish a bump plan so that essential personnel and equipment are NOT unnecessarily delayed in 
case of aircraft complications.
a. The plan defines who (by name) gets off each ai rcraft first, second, third, etc., in the event the 
aircraft cannot carry a full load.
Example of an Individual Bump Plan
Aircraft Unload Sequence
101-1 Off 1st Johnson
2 Jones
3S m i t h
4 Howard
5S t e v e n s
6B r i t t
7 Randall
8 Bump entire load

--- Page 120 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________  F-9 
b. The bump plan also defies when each aircraft lo ad will subsequently be loaded in the event an 
aircraft cannot fly.
5. The ground commander designates unit loading sites.
6. The ground commander establishes the plan and proc edure for controlling the arrival, loading, and 
departure of all aircraft.
7. The ground commander designates a PZCO.
Example of a Load Bump Plan
Aircraft Reload Plan if Bumped
101-1 Next available CH-46
101-2 Next available CH-46 after 101-1
101-3 Next available CH-46 after 101-2
101-4 1st available CH-46 in 2d wave
101-5 1st available CH-53D or CH-53E

--- Page 121 ---
F-10 __________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
STAGING PLAN
The staging plan establishes th e specific sequence, loads, ground routes, guides, and times from the
assembly area to the holding area and from the ho lding area to the PZ. The example listed below pro-
vides a guide that can be used to establish the plan.
Sequence Load Route Guide Depart Hold AR ARVPZ
1 101-1 A Lt Jones 0500 0515
2 101-2 B SSgt Brown 0500 0515
3 101-3 C Sgt Smith 0500 0515
4 102-1 A Lt Wells 0515 0530

--- Page 122 ---
APPENDIX G
HELICOPTERBORNE TRAINING
Helicopterborne training must be integrated into
unit programs on a routin e basis to develop capa-
bility at each le vel from squad through battalion.
Commanders are responsible  for their unit’s heli-
copterborne training. The objective is for units to
conduct helicopterborne operations with speed,
precision, and confidence. Infantry units, as well
as other combat, support,  and CSS un its, should
routinely receive such training.
Small-Unit Training
Standard, infantry sma ll-unit tactics and tech-
niques are the basis for the ground phase of heli-
copterborne operations. The commander ensures
that all units are proficient in these tactics, and
then combines this traini ng with training that is
specific to helicopterborne operations: staging,
loading, air movement, landing, and unloading.
The commander emphasizes the rapid loading
and unloading of aircraft, as well as quickly orga-
nizing maneuver elements  in the LZ to take
advantage of the speed an d mobility of helicop-
terborne operations.
The commander trains smal l-unit leaders to oper-
ate independent of thei r parent organization in
order to accomplish their part of the overall mis-
sion. Additionally, small-unit leaders must be able
to take charge in the absence of their seniors. The
speed and complex nature of helicopterborne oper-
ations dictates the use of SOPs and battle drills.
Mobility
The commander trains his units to travel light,
consistent with the missi on, taking only neces-
sary equipment and supplies. 
Helicopter Egress Training
Marine Corps Underwater and Immediate Passen-
ger Helicopter Airc rew Breathing Device
(IPHABD) Familiarization Program. This program
focuses on the use of the SRU-40/P IPHABD and
trains them on the SWET  (Shallow Water Egress
Trainer). All four rides in the SWET are followed
by familiarization with all the survival gear (rafts,
survival strokes, treading water) and then four rides
in the dunker (two with the IPHABD).
SOP and Training
Procedures for condu cting helicopterborne
operations are included in unit SOPs. While
SOPs include routine actions that personnel
might have to complete during an operation,
they must also include  procedures for downed
aircraft, bump plans, or other conditions that
may occur during the co nduct of operations.
The unit’s training progr am ensures that per-
sonnel are familiar with and proficient in the
procedures contained in the SOP. Also during
training, the information in the SOP is evalu-
ated for completeness, simplicity, and applica-
bility and procedures are refined as necessary.
Land Navigation
Land navigation proficiency by all leaders is crit-
ical to success. Leaders must learn to locate posi-
tions, navigate to spec ific points, and use the
terrain to their advantage.

--- Page 123 ---
G-2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
Artillery Support
Supporting artillery units  train with the maneu-
ver unit. They become familiar with the maneu-
ver unit’s SOP and teach selected maneuver unit
personnel how to plan for, employ, call for, and
adjust artillery and mortar  fires. This joint train-
ing ensures mutual unde rstanding of operational
requirements, capabilities, and limitations. If pos-
sible, the same fire support units support a partic-
ular maneuver unit for each operation.
To support helicopterborne operations, the artil-
lery must be proficient in sling loading operations
and the planning required to execute PZ/LZ oper-
ations. This planning requi res artillery leaders to
coordinate closely with  both the maneuver unit
that controls the lift assets and the aviation units
involved. HST and extern al load/unload tech-
niques require frequent training for hookup
teams, helicopter  crews, zone control personnel,
and communicators. A detailed discussion of
external loading and unloading procedures is con-
tained in MCRP 4-11.3E.
Aviation Units
Aviation unit commanders assist ground unit
commanders in the development of training in the
technical aspects of combined aviation and
ground unit training. They also ensure that their
units are technically prof icient. A working rela-
tionship between the maneuver and aviation units
is maintained whenever possible.
Infantry and Aviation
Ground and aviation units must train together and
completely understand  the MAGTF concept.
They must train in all t ypes of weather and visi-
bility. As a result of their joint training, they
refine and develop compatible SOPs.
Developing Helicopterborne 
Training Programs
A training program for helicopterborne opera-
tions should include the cr itical individual and
collective skills necessary to accomplish the war-
fighting mission. Unit training should identify
weaknesses and train to correct the weaknesses.
Conduct of Training
Helicopterborne training begins by familiarizing
individuals in aircraft procedures; this includes
loading and unloading, crash procedures, and air-
craft safety. Proficiency in these procedures pro-
vides a foundation for collective training of
ground and aviation units.
Collective training should include battle drills on
loading and unloading, as well as organizing into
combat formations on the LZ. This training allow
units to maximize the sp eed and mobility of heli-
copterborne operations.
Use of Mockups
Constraints on helicopter  flight hours limit the
amount of flight time available for training.
Therefore, much of the individual and small-unit
training has to be accomplished using aircraft
mockups. Plywood and other materials can be
used to build the mockups, which are relatively
inexpensive. Mockups can be used to train indi-
viduals on how to approa ch a helicopter, how to
get on it, and how to get off of it. Helicopterborne
battle drills can be taught by using mockups.
Combat support Marines can  be trained to load
weapons, equipment, supplies, and ammunition
on helicopters by practicing on mockups.
If the unit has a local trai ning area of adequate
size, several mockups can be used to practice bat-
tle drills to include the way the unit should off-
load aircraft in the LZ. The mockups can be
placed in different patterns to simulate different

--- Page 124 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ___________________________________________________________________________________ G-3 
landing formations. Three CH-46 mockups
should be sufficient for platoon training.
Individual and Unit Training
The following subjects should be included in
appropriate phases of individual and unit training:
z Ground units:
„ Subjects required to obtain proficiency in
ground skills and tactics.
„ SOP battle drills.
„ Physical and psychological preparedness.
„ Methods and procedur es for control and
guidance of aircraft.
„ Safety procedures in and around aircraft.
„ Control and adjustment of supporting fires.
„ Subjects required to obtain proficiency in
preparing internal and external aircraft loads.
„ Practical experience in  land and aerial navi-
gation.
„ Employment of attack helicopter units.
„ Helicopter team commander’s duties.
„ Helicopter rope suspension techniques.
„ Downed aircraft procedures.
„ LZ/PZ selection.
„ LZ/PZ control.
„ Combat support and CSS requirements and
techniques.
z Aviation units:
„ Operations planning.
„ Terrain-flying techniques and navigation.
„ Formation flying.
„ Marginal weather and reduced-visibility fly-
ing techniques.
„ Camouflage and security of aircraft.
„ Employment of aerial weapon systems.
„ Aircraft maintenance in a combat field envi-
ronment.
„ Unit control of aircraft and air traffic.
„ ITG procedures and techniques.
„ Flight operations in confined areas with
maximum loads.
„ Operations with external loads.
„ Aerial reconnaissance and security tech-
niques.
„ Battle drills.
z Subjects common to aviation and ground units:
„ Threat organizations and doctrine.
„ Recognition of threat vehicles and antiaircraft
weapons and knowledge of their capabilities.
„ Conduct of liaison and coordination.
„ Forward refueling techniques.
„ Training in defense against NBC weapons.
„ Signal security, discipline, and electronic at-
tack.
„ Casualty evacuation procedures.
„ Procedures for aerial resupply.
„ Training in helicopterborne SOPs.
Preparation
Training time and resource s must be used effi-
ciently. Each element of  the unit should be pre-
pared to do its part be fore joining support units
for combined exercises. Squad and platoons
should be trained in the following:
z Helicopterborne battle drill.
z Preparation of internal and external loads.
Staff Training
Staffs of ground and av iation units must be
trained in planning an d conducting helicopter-
borne operations with emphasis on the following:
z Capabilities and limitati ons of helicopterborne
operations.
z Command and staff relationships in the
MAGTF.
z Development of plans us ing the reverse plan-
ning sequence.
z The MAGTF rapid planning process.
z Fire support means and control and fire support
planning for helicopterborne operations.
z Logistical procedures  and requirements for
helicopterborne operations.
z Preparation of sequenced ground and air move-
ment plans.

--- Page 125 ---
APPENDIX H
MARINE CORPS HELICOPTER CHARACTERISTICS
To efficiently load an HTF aboard helicopters,
ground commanders and st affs must know the
exact composition of the force, the essential char-
acteristics of the types of  helicopters to be used
for the operation, and th e methods of computing
aircraft requirements.
Maximum aircraft loads are affected by altitude
and temperature and will differ widely according
to topography and climate  conditions common to
specific zones or areas of military operations.
Loads will further vary ba sed on the location of,
approaches to, and exits from LZs; pilot profi-
ciency; aviation unit SOP; type of engine in the
aircraft; and age of both  aircraft and aircraft
engine. Therefore, two id entical aircraft may not
be able to pick up and carry identical loads.
This appendix discusses the general characteris-
tics of Marine Corps he licopters. Refer to the
NWP 3-22.5 series for de tailed helicopter infor-
mation, technical data, and guidance for comput-
ing aircraft requirement s. Also, see JP 3-02.1,
Joint Doctrine for Landing Force Operations, for
information and examples of detailed air loading
and air movement forms. The same air movement
forms common to amphibi ous operations can be
used for subsequent ope rations ashore when such
movement documentation is essential in plan-
ning and operations.
Aircraft Availability
Aircraft availability is the overriding consideration
in helicopterborne operations . It is directly influ-
enced by the adequ acy and efficiency of mainte-
nance and supply activities and aircraft utilization
and scheduling procedures , as well as by the dis-
tance of support units from the operating units.
Both the support a nd supported commanders
should be aware that everyday use, over an
extended period, of all available aircraft results in
a reduced mission availa bility rate for future
operations. In the course of sustained operations,
aircraft maintenance must be carefully considered
and programmed so that heavy flying require-
ments will not cause a cont inual decrease in air-
craft availability.
Supported unit commanders, staffs, and logisti-
cal planners must  conserve the use of available
aircraft by—
z Establishing acceptable av ailability rates prior
to operational commitment.
z Establishing FARPs to eliminate flying hours
expended for those purposes.
z Utilizing surface means for transportation for
logistical support whenever possible.
z Coordinating logistical planning to ensure full
utilization of all aircraft sorties and to avoid
duplication of effort.
Capabilities and Limitations
Capabilities
Marine Corps helicopters  have the following
capabilities:
z Under normal conditions , helicopters can
ascend and descend at steep angles, a capabil-
ity that enables them to operate from confined
and unimproved areas.
z Troops and their comb at equipment can be
unloaded from a helico pter hovering a short
distance above the ground with fast ropes and
rappelling means, or if they can hover low

--- Page 126 ---
H-2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
enough, the troops may jump to the ground. A
rope ladder can be used to load personnel when
the helicopter cannot land.
z Cargo can be transported as an external load
and delivered to areas inaccessible to other
types of aircraft or ground transportation.
z Because of a wide speed range and high
maneuverability at slow  speeds, helicopters
can fly safely and effici ently at a low altitude,
using terrain and trees for cover and conceal-
ment.
z A helicopter’s ability to fly at high or low alti-
tudes and to decelerate rapidly, combined with
its capacity for slow forward speed and nearly
vertical landing, enable s it to operate under
marginal weather conditions.
z Helicopters can land on the objective area in a
tactical formation, LZ(s) permitting.
z Night/limited visibility  landing and lift-offs
can be made with a minimum of light.
z Helicopters flying at lo w levels are capable of
achieving surprise, deceiv ing the enemy at the
LZ(s), and employing shoc k effect through the
use of suppressive fires.
z Engine and rotor noise may deceive the enemy
as to the direction of  approach and intended
flight path.
Limitations
Limitations of Marine Corps helicopters include—
z The high fuel consumpti on rate of helicopters
imposes limitations on range and aircraft load.
Helicopters may reduce fuel load to permit an
increased aircraft load. However, reducing the
fuel load reduces the ra nge and flexibility fac-
tors, which must be considered in planning.
z Weight and balance affect flight control. Loads
must be properly distributed to keep the center
of gravity within allowable limits.
z Hail, sleet, icing, heav y rains, and gusty winds
(45 knots or more) limit or preclude use of
helicopters.
z Engine/rotor noise may compromise secrecy.
z Aviator fatigue requires greater consideration
in the operation of rota ry-wing aircraft than in
the operation of fixed-wing aircraft.
z The load carrying capability of helicopters
decreases with in creases of altitude, humidity,
and temperature. This limitation may be com-
pensated for though fuel load reduction.
z Crosswinds may affect the selection of direc-
tion of landing and lift off.
Characteristics
CH-46E
Mission: Assault troop transport
Alternate missions: Cargo transport, casualty evacuation, TRAP
Crew configuration: 2 pilots, 1 crew chief/gunner, 1 aerial 
observer/gunner
Maximum speed: 145 knots indicated airspeed (KIAS)
Maximum endurance: 2 + 55 hours (hrs)
Weapons systems: 2.50 caliber XM 218 machine guns
Payload: 4,300 lbs (18 combat-loaded troops)
CH-53D
Mission: Assault transport of equipment and supplies
Alternate missions: Assault troop transport, casualty evacuation, 
TRAP
Crew configuration: 2 pilots, 1 crew chief/gunner, 1 aerial 
observer/gunner
Maximum speed: 130 KIAS
Maximum endurance: 5 + 30 hrs
Air refuelable: No (can offload fuel to FARP and aircraft on 
the ground)
Weapons systems: 2.50 caliber XM 218 machine guns
Payload: 37 passengers
24 combat-loaded troops @ 250 lbs = 
6,000 lbs with 5 + 30 hr endurance
Cargo - 13,000 lbs

--- Page 127 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ H-3 
CH-53E
Mission: Assault transport of heavy weapons, equip-
ment, and supplies
Alternate missions: Assault troop transport , casualty evacua-
tion, TRAP
Crew configuration: 2 pilots, 1 crew chief/gunner, 1 aerial 
observer/gunner
Maximum speed: 150 KIAS
Maximum endurance: 4+00+ hrs
Air refuelable: Yes (can offload fuel to FARP or aircraft on 
the ground)
Weapons systems: 2 .50 caliber XM 218 machine guns
Lift capability: 37 to 55 passengers
24 troops @ 250 lbs =6,000 lbs with 
4+00+ hr endurance
Cargo - 32,000 lbs
UH-1N
Mission: Utility support
Alternate missions: Command and control,  CAS, FAC(A), 
TAC(A), casualty evacuation, aerial recon-
naissance, escort, assault troop transport
Crew configuration: 2 pilots, 1 crew chief/gunner, 1 aerial 
observer/gunner
Maximum speed: 130 KIAS (100 KIAS combat configured)
Maximum endurance: +30 hrs (2+30 with auxiliary fuel bag)
Weapons systems: 2.75” rockets, 7.62mm miniguns, M240G, 
.50-caliber machine guns
Lift capability: 4 combat loaded troops @ 250 lbs =
1,000 lbs with 1+30 hr endurance
AH-1W
Mission: Fire support
Alternate missions: FAC(A), TAC(A), escort, aerial 
reconnaissance
Crew: 2 pilots
Maximum speed: 170 KIAS
Maximum endurance: 2+30 hrs
Weapons systems: Missiles: TOW, Hellfire, Sidearm, Sidewinder
Guns: 20mm
Rockets: 2.75 inch (7 or 19 shot pod) 5 inch 
(4 shot pod)

--- Page 128 ---
APPENDIX I
SAMPLE HELICOPTERBORNE WARNING ORDER
1. Situation
a. Enemy Forces
b. Friendly Forces
Co ___ likely to move by helo.
Co ___ likely to move by helo.
Co ___ likely to move by helo.
______ likely to move by ______.
______ likely to move by ______.
2. Probable Mission
My commander’s intent is __________________________________.
My intent is _____________________________________________.
3. General Instructions
Anticipated PZs ________ ________ ________
________ ________ ________
Anticipated LZs ________ ________ ________
________ ________ ________
Anticipated objectives _______ ________ ________
________ ________ ________
Anticipated helicopter availability:
Co _____, _____ CH-46, _____, _____ CH-53D, _____ CH-53-E,
                  _____ UH-1N, Anticipated number of lifts: _____
Co _____, ______ CH- 46, ______, _____ CH-53D, _____ CH-53E, 
                  _____UH-1N, Anticipated number of lifts: _____

--- Page 129 ---
I-2 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
4. Special Instructions
PZCO(s) __________ ______________________________
PZCO(s) __________ ______________________________
HST requests from landing support battalion:
Marines __________
Equipment __________ ______________________________
________________________________________

--- Page 130 ---
APPENDIX J
GLOSSARY
SECTION 1. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
ACE  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . aviation combat element
AFL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . assault flight leader
AMC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . air mission commander
AR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . aerial refueling
ARVPZ . . . . . . . . . aerial rendezvous pickup zone
ASC(A) . . . assault support coordinator (airborne)
BA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . basic allowance
C2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .command and control
CAS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . close air support
CEOI . . . . . . . . . . . . . communications-electronic
operating instructions
Co . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .company
CSS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . combat service support
CSSD  . . . . . . combat service support detachment
CSSE. . . . . . . . . .combat service support element
DASC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . direct air support center
DOA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .day(s) of ammunition
DOS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . days of suppy
EFL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . escort flight leader
EW  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .electronic warfare
FAC. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . forward air controller
FAC(A) . . . . . . . forward air controller (airborne)
FARP  . . . . . . forward arming and refueling point
FEBA  . . . . . . . . . .forward edge of the battle area
FLOT  . . . . . . . . . . . . .forward line of own troops
FM. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . frequency modulation
FMFM. . . . . . . . . . . . Fleet Marine Force manual
FSC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fire support coordinator
FSCC. . . . . . . . . . fire support coordination center
FSSG. . . . . . . . . . . . . force service support group
G-3  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . operations staff officer
(brigade or higher staff)
GCE  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ground combat element
HEALT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .helicopter employment
and assault landing table
HIMARS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . high mobility
artillery rocket system
HST. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . helicopter support team
HTF. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . helicopterborne task force
HUC  . . . . . . . . . helicopterborne unit commander
HWSAT  . . . . . . . . . . . helicopter wave and serial
assignment table
IADS . . . . . . . . . . Integrated Air Defense System
IPB  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . intelligence preparation
of the battlespace
ITG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . initial terminal guidance
JP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . joint publication
KIAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .knots indicated airspeed
km . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . kilometer
LAAD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . low altitude air defense
lb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pound
LZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . landing zone
MAGTF  . . . . . . . . . Marine air-ground task force
MCRP . . . . . .Marine Corps reference publication
MCWP  . . .Marine Corps warfighting publication
MEB . . . . . . . . . . . Marine expeditionary brigade
MEF  . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marine expeditionary force
METT-T . . . . . . . . . . . . . mission, enemy, terrain
and weather, troops and
support available—time available
MEU . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Marine expeditionary unit
MHE . . . . . . . . . . . materials handling equipment
MLRS . . . . . . . . Multiple Launch Rocket System
mm  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .millimeter
NBC  . . . . . . . . .nuclear, biological, and chemical
NSN  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . National Stock Number

--- Page 131 ---
J-2 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
NVD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . night vision device
NWP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .naval warfare publication
OCOKA-W . . . . . . . . . . observation and fields of
fire, cover and concealment, obstacles,
key terrain, avenues of approach, weather
OPORD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . operation order
OPSEC  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . operations security
POW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . prisoner of war
PZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . pickup zone
PZCO  . . . . . . . . . . . . pickup zone control officer
S-1. . . . . . . . . . manpower/personnel staff officer
(battalion or regiment)
S-2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . intelligence staff officer
(battalion or regiment)
S-3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . operations staff officer
(battalion or regiment)
S-4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . logistics staff officer
(battalion or regiment)
SAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . surface-to-air missile
SEAD  . . . . . . .suppression of enemy air defenses
SOP . . . . . . . . . . . . .standing operating procedure
TAC(A). . . . . . tactical air coordinator (airborne)
TACP  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tactical air control party
TAR  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tactical air request
TDAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . tactical defense alert radar
TOW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . tube launched, optically
tracked wire guided missile
TRAP  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .tactical recovery of
aircraft and personnel
UHF  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ultrahigh frequency
VHF  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . very high frequency
WV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . wave
XO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .executive officer
SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS
acquisition—The process of locating a target with
a search radar such that  a tracking radar can take
over and begin tracking the target. (To be incorpo-
rated into the next edition of MCRP 5-12C.)
air defense artillery —Weapons and equipment
for actively combatting air targets from the
ground. Also called ADA. (JP 1-02)
air mission commander —A mission
commander, who shall be a properly qualified
naval aviator or naval fl ight officer, should be
designated when separate aircraft formations,
each led by its own formation leader, are required
for a common support mi ssion or whenever a
formation of four or more aircraft must perform a
multiple sortie mission. The mission commander
shall direct a coordinated plan of action and shall
be responsible for the effectiveness of the mission.
Also called AMC. (MCRP 5-12C)
air officer —An officer (aviator/naval flight
officer) who functions as  chief adviser to the
commander on all aviation matters. An air officer
is normally found at ba ttalion level and higher
within the ground combat element and within the
Marine air-ground task force command element
and combat service suppo rt element headquarters
staffs. The air officer is the senior member of the
tactical air control party.  The battalion air officer
supervises the training and operation of the two
battalion forward air cont rol parties. Also called
AO. (MCRP 5-12C)
airspace coordination area —A three-dimen-
sional block of airspace in a target area, estab-
lished by the appropriate ground commander, in
which friendly aircraft are reasonably safe from
friendly surface fires. The airspace coordination
area may be formal or informal. Also called
ACA. (JP 1-02) 

--- Page 132 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ J-3 
artillery preparation —Artillery fire delivered
before an attack to di srupt communications and
disorganize the enemy’s defense. (AAP-6[2004])
assault support —The use of aircraft to provide
tactical mobility and lo gistic support for the
MAGTF, the movement of high priority cargo
and personnel within the immediate area of oper-
ations, in-flight refuelin g, and the evacuation of
personnel and cargo. (MCRP 5-12C)
assault support coor dinator (airborne) —An
aviator who coordinates,  from an aircraft, the
movement of aviation assets during assault
support operations. Al so called ASC(A). (MCRP
5-12C)
assault support helicopter —A helicopter which
moves assault troops, equipment, and cargo into
an objective area and which provides helicopter
support to the assault forces.
battle  position —(Army) 1. A defensive loca-
tion oriented on a li kely enemy avenue of
approach. (FM3-90) 2. For attrack helicopters, an
area designated in whic h they can maneuver and
fire into a designated engagement area or engage
targets of opportunity. (FM 1-112) (Marine
Corps) 1. In ground oper ations, a defensive loca-
tion oriented on an en emy avenue of approach
from which a unit may de fend. 2. In air opera-
tions, an airspace coordination area containing
fire points for attack helicopters. Also called BP.
(MCRP 5-12)
casualty evacuation —The movement of casual-
ties. It includes moveme nt both to and between-
medical treatment facilitie s. Any vehicle may be
used to evacuate ca sualties. Also called CASE-
VAC . (JP 1-02). The move ment of the sick,
wounded, or injured. It  begins at the point of
injury or the onset of di sease. It includes move-
ment both to and betw een medical treatment
facilities. All units have  an evacuation capabil-
ity. Any vehicle may be used to evacuate casual-
ties. If a medical vehicle is not used it should be
replaced with one at th e first opportunity. Simi-
larly, aeromedical evacu ation should replace
surface evacuation at the first opportunity.
(MCRP 5-12C)
checkpoint —Geographical location on land or
water above which the posi tion of an aircraft in
flight may be determined by observation or by
electrical means. (Joint Pub 1-02) (Part three of
four-part definition.)
close air support —Air action by fixed– and
rotary-wing aircraft against hostile targets that are
in close proximity to fri endly forces and that
require detailed integrat ion of each air mission
with the fire and moveme nt of those forces. Also
called CAS. (JP 1-02)
combat air patrol —An aircraft patrol provided
over an objective area, th e force protected, the
critical area of a combat zone, or in an air defense
area, for the purpose of intercepting and destroy-
ing hostile aircraft before they reach their targets.
Also called CAP. (JP 1-02)
command and control aircraft —A tactical
mission aircraft for the use of the helicopter coor-
dinator (airborne) a nd helicopterborne unit
commander to coordinate and control tactical heli-
copter assaults, troop movement, commander’s
reconnaissance, and other related missions.
communications -electronics operations instruc-
tion—An instruction containing details on call
sign assignments, frequency assignments, codes
and ciphers, and authenti cation tables and their
use. The communications-electronic operating
instructions (CEOI) is designated to complement
information contained in  operational unit com-
munication standing ope rating procedures or
Annex K (Combat Informa tion Systems) to the
operation order. The mo st common version if
CEOI in use by the Marine Corps is the auto-
mated communications-elect ronics instructions,
produced by the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration. Also called CEOI.

--- Page 133 ---
J-4 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
control point —A position marked by a buoy,
boat, aircraft, electronic device, conspicuous
terrain feature, or other identifiable object which
is given a name or number  and used as an aid to
navigation or control of sh ips, boats, or aircraft.
(Joint Pub 1-02) (Part tw o of a four-part defini-
tion.)
day(s) of ammunition —Unit of measurement of
replenishing ammunition expressed as a speci-
fied number of rounds, or items of bulk ammuni-
tion as may be appropriate per weapon, unit,
individual kit, set, or us ing device required for
one day of combat. Also  called DOA. (MCRP 5-
12C)
D-day—The unnamed day on which a particular
operation commences or is to commence. (JP 1-
02)
departure point —1. A navigational check point
used by aircraft as a mark er for setting course. 2.
In amphibious operations, an air control point at
the seaward end of the he licopter approach lane
system from which he licopter waves are
dispatched along the selected helicopter approach
lane to the initial point. (JP 1-02)
direct air support center —The principal air
control agency of the US Marine air command
and control system respons ible for the direction
and control of air operations directly supporting
the ground combat element. It processes and coor-
dinates requests for imm ediate air support and
coordinates air missions requiring integration with
ground forces and other supporting arms. It
normally collocates with the senior fire support
coordination center within the ground combat
element and is subordinate to the tactical air
command center. Also called DASC. (JP 1-02)
effective range —That range at which a weapon
or weapons system has a fifty percent probability
of hitting a target (MCRP 5-12C)
electronic attack—See electronic warfare.
electronic intelligence —Technical and geoloca-
tion intelligence deri ved from foreign non-
communications electr omagnetic radiations
emanating from other than nuclear detonations or
radioactive sources. Also called ELINT. (JP 1-02)
electronic protection—See electronic warfare.
electronic warfare—Any military action involv-
ing the use of electromagnetic and directed energy
to control the electromagnetic spectrum or to
attack the enemy. Also called EW. The three
major subdivisions within electronic warfare are:
electronic attack, electr onic protection, and elec-
tronic warfare support. a.  electronic attack. That
division of electronic warfare involving the use of
electromagnetic energy, directed energy, or antira-
diation weapons to attack personnel, facilities, or
equipment with the intent of degrading, neutraliz-
ing, or destroying enemy combat capability and is
considered a form of fires. Also called EA. EA
includes: 1) actions taken to prevent or reduce an
enemy’s effective use of the electromagnetic
spectrum, such as ja mming and electromagnetic
deception, and 2) employ ment of weapons that
use either electromagneti c or directed energy as
their primary destructive mechanism (lasers, radio
frequency weapons, particle beams). b. electronic
protection. That division  of electronic warfare
involving passive and active means taken to
protect personnel, facilities, and equipment from
any effects of friendly or enemy employment of
electronic warfare that degrade, neutralize, or
destroy friendly combat capability. Also called
EP. c. electronic warfare support. That division of
electronic warfare involving actions tasked by, or
under direct control of, an operational commander
to search for, intercept, identify, and locate or
localize sources of inten tional and unintentional
radiated electromagnetic energy for the purpose of
immediate threat recogniti on, targeting, planning
and conduct of future operations. Thus, electronic
warfare support provides information required for
decisions involving electronic warfare operations
and other tactical actions  such as threat avoid-
ance, targeting, and homing. Also called ES. Elec-
tronic warfare support data can be used to produce

--- Page 134 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ J-5 
signals intelligence, provide targeting for elec-
tronic or destructive attack, and produce measure-
ment and signature intelligence. (JP 1-02)  
firing positions —In helicopterborne operations,
a position occupied by an individual attack heli-
copter in order to engage targets. A battle posi-
tion contains one or more  firing positions. See
also battle position.
fire support coordination center —A single
location in which are centralized communica-
tions facilities and personnel incident to the coor-
dination of all forms of fi re support. Also called
FSCC. (JP 1-02)
flight leader—A pilot qualified in model or heli-
copter aircraft commander designated in writing
by the helicopter unit co mmander. In flight,
including escorts, the overa ll flight leader is the
helicopter transport commander.
forward air controller—An officer (aviator/pilot)
member of the tactical air control party who, from
a forward ground or air borne position, controls
aircraft in close air support of ground troops. (JP 1-
02) Also called FAC. (MCRP 5-12C)
forward air controller (airborne) —A specifi-
cally trained and qualifie d aviation officer who
exercises control from the air of aircraft engaged
in close air support of  ground troops. The
forward air controller (airborne) is normally an
airborne extension of th e tactical air control
party. Also called FAC(A). (JP 1-02)
forward arming and refueling point—A tempo-
rary facility–organized, equipped, and deployed
by an aviation commande r, and normally located
in the main battle area closer to the area where
operations are being cond ucted than the aviation
unit’s combat service area–to provide fuel and
ammunition necessary for the employment of
aviation maneuver units in combat. The forward
arming and refueling point permits combat
aircraft to rapidly refuel and rearm simulta-
neously. Also called FARP.  (JP 1-02)
forward edge of  the battle area —The foremost
limits of a series of areas in which ground combat
units are deployed, excludi ng the areas in which
the covering or screening forces are operating,
designated to coordinate fire support, the posi-
tioning of forces, or the maneuver of units. Also
called FEBA. (JP 1-02)
forward line of own troops —A line that indi-
cates the most forward positions of friendly
forces in any kind of military operation at a
specific time. The forward line of own troops
(FLOT) normally identif ies the forward location
of covering and screening forces. The FLOT may
be at, beyond, or short of  the forward edge of the
battle area. An enemy FLOT indicates the
forward-most position of  hostile forces. Also
called FLOT. (JP 1-02)
ground fire —Small arms ground-to-air fire
directed against aircraft. (JP 1-02)
helicopter assault force —A task organization
combining helicopters, supporting units, and heli-
copterborne troop units for use in helicopter-
borne assault operations. (JP 1-02)
helicopterborne assault —The landing of heli-
copterborne forces within or adjacent to an objec-
tive area for the pur pose of occupying and
controlling the objective area and positioning
units for action against hostile forces.
helicopterborne operation—A military action in
which combat forces and their equipment maneu-
ver about the battlefield by helicopters or verti-
cal-landed aircraft. (MCRP 5-12C)
helicopterborne unit commander —The ground
officer who has been designated by the MAGTF
commander to be the co mmander of the helicop-
terborne force and who is charged with the
accomplishment of the gr ound tactical plan. Also
called HUC.
helicopter direction center —In amphibious
operations, the primary direct control agency for

--- Page 135 ---
J-6 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
the helicoter group/unit commander operating
under the overall control of the tactical air control
center. (JP 1-02) The he licopter direction center
is an agency within the Navy tactical air control
system and is position afloat. The helicopter
direction center is not a Marine air command and
control system agency, but it interacts closely
with the direct air suppor t center in the control of
helicopter operations be tween ship and shore.
The helicopter di rection center also interacts
closely with the air support element of the Marine
expeditionary unit aviation combat element. Also
called HDC. (MCRP 5-12C)
helicopter employment and assault landing
table—A planning document  prepared jointly by
the helicopter and helicopterborne unit command-
ers. It includes detailed plans for the movement of
helicopterborne troops, e quipment, and supplies.
It is the landing timet able for the helicopter
movement uniting scheduled units with numbered
flights and waves and pr ovides the basis for the
helicopter unit’s flight sche dule. It is used by the
appropriate air control ag ency to control the heli-
copter movement. Also called HEALT.
helicopter support team —1. A task organiza-
tion formed and equippe d for employment in a
landing zone to facilita te the landin g and move-
ment of helicopterborne troops, equipment, and
supplies, and to evacuate selected casualties and
enemy prisoners of war. Also called HST. (JP 1-
02) 2. Within the Marine Corps, helicopter
support teams are sourced  fromthe force service
support group, specifically from the landing
support company of the support battalion. (To be
included in the next edition of MCRP 5-12C.)
helicopter wave —One or more helicopters
grouped under a single lead er scheduled to land
in the same landing zone at approximately the
same time. A helicopter wave is composed of one
or more flights and can consist of helicopters
from more than one ship. See also wave.
helicopter wave and serial assignment table —
A planning document utili zed in helicopterborne
operations describing th e tactical unit, equip-
ment, and supplies that are to be loaded into each
helicopter. The table id entifies each heliteam
with its assigned serial  number and the serial
number with the flight and wave. Also called
HWSAT.
H-hour—The specific hour on D-day at which a
particular operation commences. (JP 1-02)
high frequency —A high frequency of 3 MHz to
30 MHz.
holding point —A geographicall y or electroni-
cally defined location us ed in stationing aircraft
in flight in a predetermi ned pattern in accordance
with air traffic control clearance. (JP 1-02)
hostile area —Area of known enemy concentra-
tion in which intense opposition can be expected.
It differs from an insecure area in that no friendly
forces are in the imme diate area, landing zones
are unprotected, and fixed-wing preparation fire
is normally mandatory.
initial point —1. The first point at which a
moving target is locate d on a plotting board. 2. A
well-defined point, easily  distinguishable visual
and/or electronically, used  as a starting point for
the bomb run to the target. 3. airborne -A point
close to the landing ar ea where serials (troop
carrier air formations) ma ke final alterations in
course to pass over indivi dual drop zone  or land-
ing zones. 4. helicopter -An air control point in
the vicinity of the landi ng zone from which indi-
vidual flights of helicopt ers are directed to their
prescribed landing sites.  5. Any designated place
at which a column or el ement thereof is formed
by the successive arrival of its various subdivi-
sions, and comes under the control of the
commander ordering the move. (JP 1-02)
initial terminal guidance —A mission normally
assigned to reconnaissance units to provide the
helicopter coordinator (airborne) with informa-
tion resulting from prelanding reconnaissance.
They establish and opera te signal devices for

--- Page 136 ---
Helicopterborne Operations ____________________________________________________________________________________ J-7 
guiding the initial heli copter waves from the
initial point to the landing zone. Also called ITG.
intelligence requirement —1. Any subject,
general or specific, upon which there is a need for
the collection of informa tion or the production of
intelligence. 2. A require ment for intelligence to
fill a gap in the command’s knowledge or under-
standing of the battlespace or threat forces. (JP 1-
02)  3. In Marine Corp s usage, questions about
the enemy and the enviro nment, the answers to
which a commander requires to make sound
doctrine. Also called IR. (MCRP 5-12C)
Jamming—The deliberate radiation or reflection
of electromagnetic energy to prevent or degrade
the receipt of information by a receiver. It
includes communications  and noncommunica-
tions jamming. (MCRP 5-12A)
laager point —Secure location on the ground
designated by aviation units utilized for the
rendezvous, marshalling, or positioning of flights
of aircraft between missi ons or awaiting comple-
tion or activation of an assigned mission. Other
than communications, no other support should be
required. This site may be isolated and indepen-
dent or it may be adjacent  to an airfield, facility,
or forward arming and refueling point.
landing point —A point within a landing site
where one helicopter or vertical takeoff and land-
ing aircraft can land. (JP 1-02)
landing site —A site within a landing zone
containing one or more landing points. (JP 1-02)
landing zone —A specified zone used for the
landing of aircraft. (JP 1-02)
L-hour —In amphibious operations, the time at
which the first helicopter  of the helicopterborne
assault wave touches down  in the landing zone.
(MCRP 5-12C)
low frequency —A frequency of 30 kHz to 300
kHz.
low level flight —Flight conducted at constant
airspeed and indicated altitude at which detention
or observation of an airc raft or of the points from
which and to which it is flying is avoided or mini-
mized. The route is preselected and conforms
generally to a straight line.
Marine air-ground task force —The Marine
Corps principal organiza tion for all missions
across the range of military operations, composed
of forces task-organ ized under a single
commander capable of re sponding rapidly to a
contingency anywhere in the world. The types of
forces in the Marine  air-ground task force
(MAGTF) are functionally grouped into four core
elements: a command element, an aviation combat
element, a ground combat element, and a combat
service support element. The four core elements
are categories of forces, not formal commands.
The basic structure of the MAGTF never varies,
though the number, size , and type of Marine
Corps units comprising e ach of its four elements
will always be mission de pendent. The flexibility
of the organizational structure allows for one or
more subordinate MAGTFs, other Service and/or
foreign military forces, to be assigned or attached.
Also called MAGTF. (MCRP 5-12C)
mission brief —The final phase of the planning
effort that should incl ude, as attendees, all
mission participants. This brief will set forth the
concept of operations, ground tactical plan,
scheme of maneuver from the pickup zone
through the objective, and specific details
concerning mission, coordination, and execution.
mission, enemy, terrain and weather, troops
and support availabl e–time available—Factors
to be considered in estimating the situation
during the planning of the military operation.
pickup zone —The zone in which helicopters
land to pick up troop s and supplies for move-
ment to the landing zone.
pickup zone control officer —An officer who
organizes, controls, and coordinates operations in
pickup zones.

--- Page 137 ---
J-8 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________  MCWP 3-11.4
priority intelligence requirements —1. Those
intelligence requirements for which a commander
has an anticipated and stated priority in the task of
planning and decisionmak ing. (JP 1-02) 2. In
Marine Corps usage, an intelligence requirement
associated with a decision that will critically affect
the overall success of  the command’s mission.
Also called PIR. (MCRP 5-12C)
secure area —An area that has not received
hostile fire for 72 hours and in which helicopters
will most likely not be su bject to fire  during the
approach, landing, takeoff, and departure.
suppressive fire —Fires on or about a weapons
system to degrade its performance below the
level needed to fulfill its mission objectives,
during the conduct of the fire mission. (JP 1-02)
tactical air command center —The principal
Marine Corps air comma nd and control agency
from which air operations  and air defense warn-
ing functions are directed. It is the senior agency
of the Marine air command and control system
which serves as the operational command post of
the aviation combat el ement commander. It
provides the facility from which the aviation
combat element comma nder and his battlestaff
plan, supervise, coordinate, and execute all
current and future air opera tions in support of the
Marine air-ground task force. The tactical air
command center can prov ide integration, coordi-
nation, and direction of joint and combined air
operations. Also called Marine TACC . (MCRP
5-12C)
tactical air control party—A subordinate opera-
tional component of a tact ical air control system
designated to provide air liaison to land forces and
for the control of aircraft. (JP 1-02)  In the Marine
Corps, tactical air cont rol parties are organic to
infantry divisions, regi ments, and battalions.
Tactical air control parties establish and maintain
facilities for liaision and communications between
parent units and airspace control agencies, inform
and advise the ground unit commander on the
employment of supporting aircraft, and request
and control air support. Also called TACP .
(MCRP 5-12C)
tactical air coordinator (airborne) —An officer
who coordinates, from an aircraft, the action of
combat aircraft engage d in close support of
ground or sea forces. (JP 1-02) Within the Marine
air command and control sy stem, the tactical air
coordinator (airborne) is the senior air coordina-
tor having authority ove r all aircraft operating
within his assigned area. The tactical air coordi-
nator (airborne), consider ed an airborne exten-
sion of the dire ct air support center and fire
support coordination center , contributes to coor-
dination among th e tactical air control parties,
airborne forward air controllers, and the fire
direction of artillery and naval gunfire. Also
called TAC(A). (MCRP 5-12C) 
ultrahigh frequency —A frequency of 300 to
3,000 MHz.
very high frequency —A frequency of 30 to 300
MHz.
wave —A formation of forces, landing ships,
craft, amphibious vehicles  or aircraft, required to
beach or land about the sa me time. Can be classi-
fied as to type, functio n or order as shown: a.
assault wave; b. boat wave; c. helicopter wave; d.
numbered wave; e. on-ca ll wave; f. scheduled
wave. (JP 1-02)

--- Page 138 ---
APPENDIX K
REFERENCES
Joint Publications (JP)
1-02 Department of Defens e Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms
3-02.1 Joint Doctrine for Landing Force Operations
Navy Warfare Publication (NWP)
3-22.5-CH46E CH-46E Tactical Manual
3-22.5-HH60H HH-60H Tactical Manual
3-22.5-MH53 PG MH-53 Tactical  Manual Pocket Guide
3-22.5-S3B S-3B Tactical Manual
3-22.5-SAR-TAC Navy Search and Rescue Tacti cal Information Document (SAR TACAID)
Marine Corps Warfighting Publications (MCWPs)
3-11.2 Marine Rifle Squad (under development)
3-16 Fire Support Coordination in the Ground Combat Element
3-25.10 Low Altitude Air Defense Handbook
3-40.3 Communications and Information Systems
Marine Corps Reference Publications (MCRPs)
2-12A Intelligence Preparation of the Battlespace
4-11.3E Multiservice Helicopter Sli ng Load, Volumes I, II, and III
5-2A Operational Te rms and Graphics
5-12C Marine Corps Supplement to the Depart ment of Defense Dictionary of Military
and Associated Terms